FCL - General Discussion
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:42 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
no subs or swaps just means no games played or active players having to play when they aren't planning to because inactive players appear.
I'm all for rules to eliminate tactical subs and I'm not playing for xvth msn next season but I don't agree with ruining genuine subs in the process.
It makes no difference what team it was for, I was just pointing it out as it only seems to be people from your clan that are not happy with no subs or swaps, how things have panned out most people would probs prefer it now If you stuck to your no swaps or subs rule
no subs or swaps just means no games played or active players having to play when they aren't planning to because inactive players appear.
I'm all for rules to eliminate tactical subs and I'm not playing for xvth msn next season but I don't agree with ruining genuine subs in the process.
14:43 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link] i want a rule change as one team has crapped all over the integrity of the league and ruined the environment. If that clan wasn't so self involved and self obsessed and actually wanted a better environment for all then they could simply achieve that and the rules could stay the same. While they don't though then rules changes are the only option in order to restore the fun most people once had who now don't.
128 People playing clan pool. No-one has an issue with how 127 of them operate under these current rules. Should we really consider a complete overhaul because of one individual? It's very rare in life that something succeeds when you pander to the lowest common denominator. I'd rather stick to the rules and have a week of arguments everytime it happens myself.
I think Rules are there to be bent or used to your advantage but doesn't mean they are necessary right. A rule can always be bettered and modified all depends on the reasoning and what the ultimate end goal is for the changes. If it's to appease some and get the upper hand over another person/team then leave them alone. If it's to address, increase the leagues integrity, consistency and will improve the environment for EVERYONE then change is good and welcome. :-)
So whereas I said: If it ain't broke don't fix it, I'm not necessarily right.
So whereas I said: If it ain't broke don't fix it, I'm not necessarily right.
128 People playing clan pool. No-one has an issue with how 127 of them operate under these current rules. Should we really consider a complete overhaul because of one individual? It's very rare in life that something succeeds when you pander to the lowest common denominator. I'd rather stick to the rules and have a week of arguments everytime it happens myself.
14:43 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
no subs or swaps just means no games played or active players having to play when they aren't planning to because inactive players appear.
I'm all for rules to eliminate tactical subs and I'm not playing for xvth msn next season but I don't agree with ruining genuine subs in the process.
I agree.
It makes no difference what team it was for, I was just pointing it out as it only seems to be people from your clan that are not happy with no subs or swaps, how things have panned out most people would probs prefer it now If you stuck to your no swaps or subs rule
no subs or swaps just means no games played or active players having to play when they aren't planning to because inactive players appear.
I'm all for rules to eliminate tactical subs and I'm not playing for xvth msn next season but I don't agree with ruining genuine subs in the process.
I agree.
14:44 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
I havent really been following this discussion, so i apologise if this has been suggested already.
Its seems swaps are generally mostly used for any match fixing, so what if you had unlimited subs, no swaps, and if a player is subbed out of a fixture they cant be subbed back in..
Its seems swaps are generally mostly used for any match fixing, so what if you had unlimited subs, no swaps, and if a player is subbed out of a fixture they cant be subbed back in..
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:49 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link] i want a rule change as one team has crapped all over the integrity of the league and ruined the environment. If that clan wasn't so self involved and self obsessed and actually wanted a better environment for all then they could simply achieve that and the rules could stay the same. While they don't though then rules changes are the only option in order to restore the fun most people once had who now don't.
Have we though? Don't think so, that's just your opinion and all your mates will back you up. Are we self obsessed/involved? I think with the continuous isolation and us feeling segregated then its easier to just focus on ourselves and survive that way. Then we can't be accused of anything even though we still are via our thread due to us being the easy targets also to fulfill some entertainment for other clans with them being boring in comparison.
I think Rules are there to be bent or used to your advantage but doesn't mean they are necessary right. A rule can always be bettered and modified all depends on the reasoning and what the ultimate end goal is for the changes. If it's to appease some and get the upper hand over another person/team then leave them alone. If it's to address, increase the leagues integrity, consistency and will improve the environment for EVERYONE then change is good and welcome. :-)
So whereas I said: If it ain't broke don't fix it, I'm not necessarily right.
So whereas I said: If it ain't broke don't fix it, I'm not necessarily right.
Have we though? Don't think so, that's just your opinion and all your mates will back you up. Are we self obsessed/involved? I think with the continuous isolation and us feeling segregated then its easier to just focus on ourselves and survive that way. Then we can't be accused of anything even though we still are via our thread due to us being the easy targets also to fulfill some entertainment for other clans with them being boring in comparison.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:49 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
To be honest I personally don't have any issues with tactical subs but the amount been made and the reasons for them is just ridiculous and has got out of hand, no other clans do it as most people play for fun so it means nothing win or lose. Ash will do whatever is needed to try and win as It means that much to him, pretty sad that it's got to that point tbh
14:50 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
majority ??????
there is around 90+ clan players give or take a few
you have no more than 10 people posting
so please don't speak or quote on behalf of the majority who have had no input at all
Surely the majority vote counts, and it certainly seems the majority want some rules to change the way the subs work.
majority ??????
there is around 90+ clan players give or take a few
you have no more than 10 people posting
so please don't speak or quote on behalf of the majority who have had no input at all
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:51 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
faust, I would have to say I would change the rules to eradicate the leagues one root issue. If we change the rules so the one can't do what they are doing then I belive 127 people would be happier. Ideally The one would see the light and actually show some integrity but I fear season after season of the same crap. A rule change for the negative worth making in my opinion.
14:55 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
Can you edit and change the "we" and "us" to "I" and "me" please?
Have we though? Don't think so, that's just your opinion and all your mates will back you up. Are we self obsessed/involved? I think with the continuous isolation and us feeling segregated then its easier to just focus on ourselves and survive that way. Then we can't be accused of anything even though we still are via our thread due to us being the easy targets also to fulfill some entertainment for other clans with them being boring in comparison.
Can you edit and change the "we" and "us" to "I" and "me" please?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:57 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
majority ??????
there is around 90+ clan players give or take a few
you have no more than 10 people posting
so please don't speak or quote on behalf of the majority who have had no input at all
How about you carry on reading before you post again
I have said the same 10 people are on here all the time, and that a fair vote would require the ballot being posted on each clans thread.
Surely the majority vote counts, and it certainly seems the majority want some rules to change the way the subs work.
majority ??????
there is around 90+ clan players give or take a few
you have no more than 10 people posting
so please don't speak or quote on behalf of the majority who have had no input at all
How about you carry on reading before you post again
I have said the same 10 people are on here all the time, and that a fair vote would require the ballot being posted on each clans thread.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:01 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
Chris you're opinion has been proven to be correct, further proof is in the posts recently made.
I say, make changes where ever you see fit, as long as they remain consistent and fair on ALL teams and do not further isolate or alienate us then we will welcome and embrace them.
To be honest, most rules and regulations are consistent for All as they are, proven with hardly any defaults, matches being played. So whereas changes are good and welcome, keeping them as minimal as possible would be better.
If you want my really honest opinion, I think the current system works fine for all clans. Its not a fault with the system at all, its a personal issue and no doubt that will raise its head over any system, or even over something else completely different if the subs issue gets taken out of the equation.
And it will always be so until some people just decide to get over themselves, realise some things are more important and get on with it.
That said, I will still make any changes that the majority think will benefit everyone.
And it will always be so until some people just decide to get over themselves, realise some things are more important and get on with it.
That said, I will still make any changes that the majority think will benefit everyone.
Chris you're opinion has been proven to be correct, further proof is in the posts recently made.
I say, make changes where ever you see fit, as long as they remain consistent and fair on ALL teams and do not further isolate or alienate us then we will welcome and embrace them.
To be honest, most rules and regulations are consistent for All as they are, proven with hardly any defaults, matches being played. So whereas changes are good and welcome, keeping them as minimal as possible would be better.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:04 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
Chris you're opinion has been proven to be correct, further proof is in the posts recently made.
I say, make changes where ever you see fit, as long as they remain consistent and fair on ALL teams and do not further isolate or alienate us then we will welcome and embrace them.
To be honest, most rules and regulations are consistent for All as they are, proven with hardly any defaults, matches being played. So whereas changes are good and welcome, keeping them as minimal as possible would be better.
Why would any rule he made isolate one team? He isn't going to say that every is allowed 3 subs per fixture, except PD's they get 1
If you want my really honest opinion, I think the current system works fine for all clans. Its not a fault with the system at all, its a personal issue and no doubt that will raise its head over any system, or even over something else completely different if the subs issue gets taken out of the equation.
And it will always be so until some people just decide to get over themselves, realise some things are more important and get on with it.
That said, I will still make any changes that the majority think will benefit everyone.
And it will always be so until some people just decide to get over themselves, realise some things are more important and get on with it.
That said, I will still make any changes that the majority think will benefit everyone.
Chris you're opinion has been proven to be correct, further proof is in the posts recently made.
I say, make changes where ever you see fit, as long as they remain consistent and fair on ALL teams and do not further isolate or alienate us then we will welcome and embrace them.
To be honest, most rules and regulations are consistent for All as they are, proven with hardly any defaults, matches being played. So whereas changes are good and welcome, keeping them as minimal as possible would be better.
Why would any rule he made isolate one team? He isn't going to say that every is allowed 3 subs per fixture, except PD's they get 1
15:07 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
To be fair ^ those minority people are captains/VC's or heavily influential within their own clan and will talk with their own members, so more than likely represent the members of those clans and of others they speak to. As for the rest, they choose not to post. Take that into account and it's not going to be a dissimilar proportion of people who don't vote in a general election.
Best thing to do is hold this open discussion then let captains talk to their clan and come up with a vote, one vote per clan.
Best thing to do is hold this open discussion then let captains talk to their clan and come up with a vote, one vote per clan.
15:18 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
Have to disagree here. Yeah you are because you do things to suit yourself not others. Other clans would make a sub to try and accommodate other players so no further subs need to be made.
And the segregation came after the attitude adopted, not the other way round. You say other clans feel threatened by yours but that is simply untrue. Black Scorpions have come closer to winning something than yours and PD's have won things. Your survivalist attitude comes from trying to project yourself as closer to the teams above you than below you. The teams above have done nothing but welcome your competition, but you've gone about things in the wrong way.
Telling us we aren't in the top two anymore and have fallen way off it, saying you are going to smash us in the FCL. Neither had provocation, yet we respond to that and become the source of the problem in your eyes.
If you want to fix that segregation then don't act so radical, don't prejudge, don't adopt the persona of an underdog fighting the system.
Have we though? Don't think so, that's just your opinion and all your mates will back you up. Are we self obsessed/involved? I think with the continuous isolation and us feeling segregated then its easier to just focus on ourselves and survive that way. Then we can't be accused of anything even though we still are via our thread due to us being the easy targets also to fulfill some entertainment for other clans with them being
Have to disagree here. Yeah you are because you do things to suit yourself not others. Other clans would make a sub to try and accommodate other players so no further subs need to be made.
And the segregation came after the attitude adopted, not the other way round. You say other clans feel threatened by yours but that is simply untrue. Black Scorpions have come closer to winning something than yours and PD's have won things. Your survivalist attitude comes from trying to project yourself as closer to the teams above you than below you. The teams above have done nothing but welcome your competition, but you've gone about things in the wrong way.
Telling us we aren't in the top two anymore and have fallen way off it, saying you are going to smash us in the FCL. Neither had provocation, yet we respond to that and become the source of the problem in your eyes.
If you want to fix that segregation then don't act so radical, don't prejudge, don't adopt the persona of an underdog fighting the system.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:23 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
OK first question...
Do you want any changes at all to the current subs/swaps rules?
A simple YES or NO.
Nothing else. Nothing about the way anybody operates because it is irrelevant to the rules as they currently stand. And nothing about any optional or minor changes to the rules.
Feel free to go back to your electorate and prepare for governm....oops I mean go back to your clans and get one simple consensus opinion from each on that one question.
Come back by Sunday night and post an answer for each clan.
Do you want any changes at all to the current subs/swaps rules?
A simple YES or NO.
Nothing else. Nothing about the way anybody operates because it is irrelevant to the rules as they currently stand. And nothing about any optional or minor changes to the rules.
Feel free to go back to your electorate and prepare for governm....oops I mean go back to your clans and get one simple consensus opinion from each on that one question.
Come back by Sunday night and post an answer for each clan.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:28 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
majority ??????
there is around 90+ clan players give or take a few
you have no more than 10 people posting
so please don't speak or quote on behalf of the majority who have had no input at all
Totally agree also, they can't speak for the players in XVth Man, if any had any concerns then they know they can always feel free to message me with their concerns. I always welcome constructive criticism. Any issues we have had had in the past have all been dealt with via offline and will continue to be done that way. None I repeat none have been critical about the way which we/I operate.
So they can ONLY speak for themselves.
Does everyone just read what they want on this page?
I have clearly said twice, that's TWICE that I have said the same 10 people are on here all the time, and that a fair vote would require the ballot being posted on each clans thread.
Surely the majority vote counts, and it certainly seems the majority want some rules to change the way the subs work.
majority ??????
there is around 90+ clan players give or take a few
you have no more than 10 people posting
so please don't speak or quote on behalf of the majority who have had no input at all
Totally agree also, they can't speak for the players in XVth Man, if any had any concerns then they know they can always feel free to message me with their concerns. I always welcome constructive criticism. Any issues we have had had in the past have all been dealt with via offline and will continue to be done that way. None I repeat none have been critical about the way which we/I operate.
So they can ONLY speak for themselves.
Does everyone just read what they want on this page?
I have clearly said twice, that's TWICE that I have said the same 10 people are on here all the time, and that a fair vote would require the ballot being posted on each clans thread.
15:56 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
If players don't post its their loss really, I personally would vote to change as arguments happen each time XV man makes a sub but as a whole i think XV man are happy as things stand.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:59 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
Yeah, but what nobody seems to be mentioning is that the views on here aren't necessarily the majority and any thoughts would have to be posted on all threads to get a global opinion...
15:59 Wed 28 Jan 15 (GMT) [Link]
every picture tells a story.........
If players don't post its their loss really, I personally would vote to change as arguments happen each time XV man makes a sub but as a whole i think XV man are happy as things stand.
every picture tells a story.........
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
FCL - General Discussion
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.