Resetting all time rank leader boards?
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
02:45 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
Yeah it was after the ranked tournaments came in, had to win about 6 or 7 tournys without losing and a few micros
From memory I think rubber_duck's high rank score in US8 was after ranked tournaments came in (if not I am sure someone will correct me) so was a true and genuine achievement.
Yeah it was after the ranked tournaments came in, had to win about 6 or 7 tournys without losing and a few micros
07:38 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
This is the most ridiculous crap you have come out with ever i think! It's called all time for a reason, if you reset the stats then it's not going to be an all time leaderboard then is it?
Should be classed as spamming this is that bad!
Resetting all time rank leader boards?
well this site has had alot of updatings now and the only way of getting rank in the high 900's nowdays is to play in tournaments, YOOU CANT PICK WHO YOU;LL PLAY TO GET THAT EXTRA RANK, i think it should only befare if there was a before games adjustments and after so we can see the differences, coz nowdays its impossible to get to 950 in 9ball
just want to see what people say,
Cool_dude, and rubber_duck post as u like, your opinions mean nothing
well this site has had alot of updatings now and the only way of getting rank in the high 900's nowdays is to play in tournaments, YOOU CANT PICK WHO YOU;LL PLAY TO GET THAT EXTRA RANK, i think it should only befare if there was a before games adjustments and after so we can see the differences, coz nowdays its impossible to get to 950 in 9ball
just want to see what people say,
Cool_dude, and rubber_duck post as u like, your opinions mean nothing
This is the most ridiculous crap you have come out with ever i think! It's called all time for a reason, if you reset the stats then it's not going to be an all time leaderboard then is it?
Should be classed as spamming this is that bad!
08:21 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
ahh you missed the writing where it says you don't count :P
08:39 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
They still do mean something and you must think its a stupid idea as well if you have to put that.
09:02 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
yes they still do,
if you rad, itrs says perhaps a before and after the transition between the old site to where the new site is heading these days.
They still do mean something and you must think its a stupid idea as well if you have to put that.
yes they still do,
if you rad, itrs says perhaps a before and after the transition between the old site to where the new site is heading these days.
09:06 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
First of all I'm guessing you mean read? And secondly why say "ahh you missed the writing where it says you don't count" and then say they still do count in your last post :s
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
09:54 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
I believe from what i have read is all he is asking about is it possible from when the points system changed to have a Overall PRE points changes table and new PRO table since points system was changed. If think i get the drift could be wrong as it would take alot of graft
14:11 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
my 9 ball rank 894 and killer rank 943 came about a month ago, just looked and that killer rank is 5th on "all time list" dint even notice.
i think its even easier with ranked tourneys more points just dont lose
i think its even easier with ranked tourneys more points just dont lose
15:02 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
Plus the change has been in effect for some time. I don't think it would be possible to seperate the ranks from the old system to those on the new one, especially since the ranks didn't reset when the new system was brought in so someone could've maintained a high rank from the old system onto the new one. Not possible to do I think
16:56 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
would be so much better if this was brought in, jay said himself 6/7 tournys won without a loss and a few micro's for us8...
Take a look at adams 970 in UK8 - when nowadays newbies can enter tournys for ranking you'd win 0.0 or something so small it wouldn't even move you once you hit 910 let alone winning 70/80 tourny's without losing a single frame.....
Take a look at adams 970 in UK8 - when nowadays newbies can enter tournys for ranking you'd win 0.0 or something so small it wouldn't even move you once you hit 910 let alone winning 70/80 tourny's without losing a single frame.....
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:58 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
Or stop moaning because you are not as good as people once were?
17:00 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
pecisly my point, killer rank doesnt matter its exactly the same as it always has been so 970 is easy on that compared getting 915 on 9ball, coz its more of a fluke games, but i think that 930 has beeen done it is possible,
would be so much better if this was brought in, jay said himself 6/7 tournys won without a loss and a few micro's for us8...
Take a look at adams 970 in UK8 - when nowadays newbies can enter tournys for ranking you'd win 0.0 or something so small it wouldn't even move you once you hit 910 let alone winning 70/80 tourny's without losing a single frame.....
Take a look at adams 970 in UK8 - when nowadays newbies can enter tournys for ranking you'd win 0.0 or something so small it wouldn't even move you once you hit 910 let alone winning 70/80 tourny's without losing a single frame.....
pecisly my point, killer rank doesnt matter its exactly the same as it always has been so 970 is easy on that compared getting 915 on 9ball, coz its more of a fluke games, but i think that 930 has beeen done it is possible,
17:01 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
he isnt whining, simply stating my oppinion in a different way :P
he had and made a great post to this thread
Or stop moaning because you are not as good as people once were?
he isnt whining, simply stating my oppinion in a different way :P
he had and made a great post to this thread
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:04 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
Blaze you want a tissue for the end of your nose?
17:15 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
aye we had some bad times me and matt, but i like his post :P
Blaze you want a tissue for the end of your nose?
aye we had some bad times me and matt, but i like his post :P
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:51 Tue 17 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
The whole points system should be looked at. % diveded by games, bit hard to explain here, as in my phone, but it shouldnt matter who you play? A win would be + (whatever) & a loss would be - (whatever) example: a player having played 100 games and won 80 = 20% loss so divide 20 by 0.80 then times it by 100 what you have that figure, divide it by the number of games played in your overall games wins, then minus the losses. You should end up with a % out of 100, which will be the same or very close to your funky pool ranking. Let me know.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:43 Wed 18 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
I achieved 950 something and DVZ has 970 on straight both within the new tournament era of funky.
Its hard and a loss is a kick in the goolies but it shows it can be done.
Its hard and a loss is a kick in the goolies but it shows it can be done.
00:06 Tue 24 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
To be fair, straight is easier to win games for the better players as 1 fluke will not make you win a game, you actually have to earn it in straight.
Secondly, I don't see the big uproar with resetting the all time ranks. People forget this happened over on snooker a while back, they just simply renamed the old all time ranks as "old highest rank" and created a new one for the new high rank until no one cared about the old one and got rid.
I do agree for some maximum ranks they are flawed now (especially 9ball) and do need looking at.
I achieved 950 something and DVZ has 970 on straight both within the new tournament era of funky.
Its hard and a loss is a kick in the goolies but it shows it can be done.
Its hard and a loss is a kick in the goolies but it shows it can be done.
To be fair, straight is easier to win games for the better players as 1 fluke will not make you win a game, you actually have to earn it in straight.
Secondly, I don't see the big uproar with resetting the all time ranks. People forget this happened over on snooker a while back, they just simply renamed the old all time ranks as "old highest rank" and created a new one for the new high rank until no one cared about the old one and got rid.
I do agree for some maximum ranks they are flawed now (especially 9ball) and do need looking at.
00:53 Tue 24 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
yep but people are forgetting, tournament rank hasn't doubled, normal rank has been halved if you picture that destiny got his 9 ball rank through tournaments then its all good.
i don't mind if it resets or not but at the moment i don't think its worth it.
i don't mind if it resets or not but at the moment i don't think its worth it.
10:07 Tue 24 Apr 12 (BST) [Link]
he didnt get it through touyraments though, thats the whole point, he chose every opponent he plyed, meaning if he thought he would lose he wouldnt play,
yep but people are forgetting, tournament rank hasn't doubled, normal rank has been halved if you picture that destiny got his 9 ball rank through tournaments then its all good.
i don't mind if it resets or not but at the moment i don't think its worth it.
i don't mind if it resets or not but at the moment i don't think its worth it.
he didnt get it through touyraments though, thats the whole point, he chose every opponent he plyed, meaning if he thought he would lose he wouldnt play,
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Resetting all time rank leader boards?
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.