what you all suggest then?

should we limit swaps ability to 2nd week?

have maximum of 3-4 swaps per fixture?

hit me up with some ideas people as i feel i am alone at the moment.

I would limit swaps to 1 again till the last 3 days of the fixture then take off the restriction, that way you know the swaps are being done to get games played because people are online.
I don't think you should have to have consent from the other captain for a swap either.

if its last 3 days i dont think over captain will mind unless one of their players organised something which they should write on their thread anyway to avoid being subbed out.

3-4 fixture swaps still quite a lot... can still change whole fixture.

I'm not saying no just thinking, 2nd week is a good option but I don't like the way the other player involved in swap may have made arrangements to play already.

Like said before as rules stand you may as well have no set matches and 8 vs 8 add everyone to mates and just play whoever is online when you are.

right ok so 1 swap until friday eve of the deadline lets say then take barrier away so games can get played?

i think subbing anyone in unless they played that fixture is a good addition as it has really cut the defaults down.

team changes? should we still have 15/16 or lower it a little bit

obviously can't change current rules until next season but for now with the 3 problem rules all i can do is reword them when i get confirmation from kev.

You could do fixture swaps last season without getting permission and I don't think there was any debates or arguing on here, correct me if im wrong.

Im not having a go at shooters but they seem to have a few issues with different rules, is this just a case of while you were gone a few changes were made and your not quite up to date with the changes, surely the rules are not going to get changed back because one clan needs to catch up.

I say keep subs and swaps unlimited, at the end of the day if 8 plays 8 and it keeps defaults down it can't be a bad thing, tactical or not its still 8 registered players from each clan.

the main problem here is that the rules changed slightly but the rule wording stayed the same


Edited at 16:03 Sun 14/08/11 (BST)

shouldn't do no ab.

as you said on another thread the way things are people people could sub into more favourable fixture and as team angry pointed out it might happen consistently so need a way to cut it down a bit.

dont think thats a correct statement to be made do you really

transfer of players and naming is in the rules

thats a fact and another clan is in total breach of the rules by naming players

so i dont think its one clan that has a problem rules are there to be observed as here on funkypool

doubted2

may i take this oppertunity to let you no big_mouse cannot be a captain in FCL has he hasnt had 1 seasons experince in clans

i suggest you read the rules of FCL

cheers
craig

ps just trying to be helpful

hi people i just like to say if rule as be broken for others in this rule so why not again

You can change the swap rule if you want but unlimited subs and being allowed to sub players back in will be a way around it, surely to help cut down defaults the rules are fine as they are, they just need updated on the website so all clans understand them.

Change the record craig, we did that one yesterday and you lost....get over it

not sticking up for no one here but that rule was only brought in for time zone that the only time it should be used

lost

dont getya another constructive comment, love to know how you constantly get away with your comments

the topic of this thread lee

is league discussion not slate blueberry and doubted2

maybe make ur own thread up sure it will be busy

now maybe back on topic

big_mouse if you have an example of it being broken

then its sets a precident, if it did happen you have case in my oppinion

The topic of conversation is swaps now you're prattling on about naming again when everyone accepted nobody had done anything wrong yesterday...change the record!!

i think you need a committee that keep to the rules not league runners it all ways same they change their mind for people they like which is wrong iv seen it happen loads of time over the seasons

like the one you pointed out to me doubted2 yes that rule was broken so if one team can do why cant the rest do it

yet again another non-constructive comment,,, hmmmm dont see were ive mentioned that recently

so moving on back on topic ,,, i truly dont understand your problem why are you constantly trying to provoke arguments

as ive said maybe make your own thread

again back to topic

Correct me if I'm wrong, but all teams that have named players against the rules have been warned. The rules have therefore been applied equally to everyone right?

didnt no that seb