FCL - General Discussion
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
01:07 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link] again that's ridiculous!! How on earth does that show I'm happy and settled. Mirrr gave kisses in his posts does that not suggest he was more settled than what you have linked. If that's the best you could find thank you for confirming my point.
I'd rather you confirmed we can all now move freely as we should be able to though. A point I'm fully aware you are dodging.
http://www.funkypool.com/thread/20004/unbeatables-if-only-carlsberg-made-threads/35#1738075
You settled in UB, giving your opinion on number of sides for SL. That suggests someone settled in when they are giving their opinion on the clans future and actually having a conversation with someone on the thread.
What could huts have said that would've changed dgen's mind that he didn't already know? huts said if you read my last message to mirrr, dgen said huts hadn't sent it in so couldn't read it. Of course new information could change his mind because he is making a decision based on all information. If dgen wanted more information then he could've messaged him. But there was nothing to suggest the post held anything more than we already knew and looking at the post that is still true.
You settled in UB, giving your opinion on number of sides for SL. That suggests someone settled in when they are giving their opinion on the clans future and actually having a conversation with someone on the thread.
What could huts have said that would've changed dgen's mind that he didn't already know? huts said if you read my last message to mirrr, dgen said huts hadn't sent it in so couldn't read it. Of course new information could change his mind because he is making a decision based on all information. If dgen wanted more information then he could've messaged him. But there was nothing to suggest the post held anything more than we already knew and looking at the post that is still true.
I'd rather you confirmed we can all now move freely as we should be able to though. A point I'm fully aware you are dodging.
01:15 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
It shows you are comfortable and established in UB. No it shows that he was being friendly and tried to settle in, but got nothing in return. I'm not the head runner as you well know, so I can't confirm or deny anything. I'm only defending my view point.
Keith is the head runner, only Keith has the authority to do what you ask which has already been said. I never avoided the point, it is something beyond my position which you already know and already have been told.
Keith is the head runner, only Keith has the authority to do what you ask which has already been said. I never avoided the point, it is something beyond my position which you already know and already have been told.
01:49 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
Nothing to spit my dummy out about, it worked out in my favour... so your attempt at humour fails.
Look, it's mirrr and the chips clan spitting their dummy!!
You can post as many times as you like that it's fair! When all is said and done mich, horse, dgen and others have come out of this looking silly. Just because your lapdog team mates run in adding backup doesn't make it fair. Reading your replies trying to justify making exception for an attention seeking baby is laughable and quite frankly embarrassing.
Respect to faust for his earlier post stating he doesn't like certain peoples views, but right is right. Also respect to onevisit for putting his side across in a way that shows this situation for exactly what it is!
Hutts, we know he's done you over here and others have let it go on
You can post as many times as you like that it's fair! When all is said and done mich, horse, dgen and others have come out of this looking silly. Just because your lapdog team mates run in adding backup doesn't make it fair. Reading your replies trying to justify making exception for an attention seeking baby is laughable and quite frankly embarrassing.
Respect to faust for his earlier post stating he doesn't like certain peoples views, but right is right. Also respect to onevisit for putting his side across in a way that shows this situation for exactly what it is!
Hutts, we know he's done you over here and others have let it go on
Nothing to spit my dummy out about, it worked out in my favour... so your attempt at humour fails.
01:56 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
For clarification the league rules still stand as they are. If another player is unhappy and they request to leave but their clan refuses to release them. They have the right to ask the same as mirrr and they will be treated exactly the same.
02:11 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
I think Everyone can see that ! must admit your post is very accurate.
Look, it's mirrr and the chips clan spitting their dummy!!
You can post as many times as you like that it's fair! When all is said and done mich, horse, dgen and others have come out of this looking silly. Just because your lapdog team mates run in adding backup doesn't make it fair. Reading your replies trying to justify making exception for an attention seeking baby is laughable and quite frankly embarrassing.
Respect to faust for his earlier post stating he doesn't like certain peoples views, but right is right. Also respect to onevisit for putting his side across in a way that shows this situation for exactly what it is!
Hutts, we know he's done you over here and others have let it go on
You can post as many times as you like that it's fair! When all is said and done mich, horse, dgen and others have come out of this looking silly. Just because your lapdog team mates run in adding backup doesn't make it fair. Reading your replies trying to justify making exception for an attention seeking baby is laughable and quite frankly embarrassing.
Respect to faust for his earlier post stating he doesn't like certain peoples views, but right is right. Also respect to onevisit for putting his side across in a way that shows this situation for exactly what it is!
Hutts, we know he's done you over here and others have let it go on
I think Everyone can see that ! must admit your post is very accurate.
11:11 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
I don't see the point in this been a rule. If someone wants to play for another clan then all they have to do is say they are not happy, may as well remove the rule and carry on how It's bin for the last couple of seasons.
For clarification the league rules still stand as they are. If another player is unhappy and they request to leave but their clan refuses to release them. They have the right to ask the same as mirrr and they will be treated exactly the same.
I don't see the point in this been a rule. If someone wants to play for another clan then all they have to do is say they are not happy, may as well remove the rule and carry on how It's bin for the last couple of seasons.
11:34 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
I'll bring this forward again...
I'm sure a couple of seasons ago everybody was given a 'free transfer card' and we did away with the window. Basically anyone could transfer to another clan at any point in the season (and start playing from the next fixture set) once and only once.
14:20 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
Professionals
nike
I haven't a problem with any struggling being allowed to sign some players when in crisis
however why should they be allowed to sign only class players
there are many willing players, who would love to play for pros
sign them and make your numbers up
this is farcical a situation, there are loads of eligible players
with account edibility
they don't need to play ineligible players
or am I wrong here
Edited at 11:36 Tue 28/04/15 (BST)
nike
I haven't a problem with any struggling being allowed to sign some players when in crisis
however why should they be allowed to sign only class players
there are many willing players, who would love to play for pros
sign them and make your numbers up
this is farcical a situation, there are loads of eligible players
with account edibility
they don't need to play ineligible players
or am I wrong here
Edited at 11:36 Tue 28/04/15 (BST)
14:26 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
Its up to Pros who they sign just like any clan. If they want to sign only class players then its up to them
14:36 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
not when they are ineligible James
Its up to Pros who they sign just like any clan. If they want to sign only class players then its up to them
not when they are ineligible James
14:40 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
even ineligible mate as they can still wait but not play.
14:47 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
14:49 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
Well its down to the Runners discretion mate, we didn't have a say this time but i would rather have the league still intact with all clans than Pros folding and then having to update stuff again.
Well its down to the Runners discretion mate, we didn't have a say this time but i would rather have the league still intact with all clans than Pros folding and then having to update stuff again.
14:51 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
miss the point there are players who would love to sign
who are eligible
who are eligible
15:00 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
It's been allowed for the last couple of seasons at least so I'm not sure why It's changed. It should be the same rules for everyone, so either allow it again for all clans or don't allow it at all, same as the other rule that hasn't existed for the last couple of seasons as well.
15:04 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
Maybe but you can't say to Ash, sign Hardy because he loves to join because it would be a no.
Some clans sign anyone, others aim to win the league so sign only strong players. I mean back in the day MVP was so strong that even when i nearly achieved their goal they didn't need me and rightfully so where others would snap up the opportunity.
Its all about if you want to win the league or have fun
miss the point there are players who would love to sign
who are eligible
who are eligible
Maybe but you can't say to Ash, sign Hardy because he loves to join because it would be a no.
Some clans sign anyone, others aim to win the league so sign only strong players. I mean back in the day MVP was so strong that even when i nearly achieved their goal they didn't need me and rightfully so where others would snap up the opportunity.
Its all about if you want to win the league or have fun
15:14 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
Maybe but you can't say to Ash, sign Hardy because he loves to join because it would be a no.
Some clans sign anyone, others aim to win the league so sign only strong players. I mean back in the day MVP was so strong that even when i nearly achieved their goal they didn't need me and rightfully so where others would snap up the opportunity.
Its all about if you want to win the league or have fun
sorry but your wrong
it says this clan may have folded
so sign eligible players, if your short on numbers you either sign players or fold
not been to selective either and have rules amended to suit isn't right James
underdogs a few seasons ago struggled and were allowed to sign players, the thought of that team turning down players, only to sign the top 7 or 8 in the clan leagues
is farcical even by your standards
you sign eligible players to get games done, not bend rules
to suit, account details of 31 days is the required minimum
for any player
but not now
you can jump ship make a new account and play for anyone anytime, sorry I'm making a point and a valid one it is
and btw I have no problems with Pros
its the situation I don't agree with
miss the point there are players who would love to sign
who are eligible
who are eligible
Maybe but you can't say to Ash, sign Hardy because he loves to join because it would be a no.
Some clans sign anyone, others aim to win the league so sign only strong players. I mean back in the day MVP was so strong that even when i nearly achieved their goal they didn't need me and rightfully so where others would snap up the opportunity.
Its all about if you want to win the league or have fun
sorry but your wrong
it says this clan may have folded
so sign eligible players, if your short on numbers you either sign players or fold
not been to selective either and have rules amended to suit isn't right James
underdogs a few seasons ago struggled and were allowed to sign players, the thought of that team turning down players, only to sign the top 7 or 8 in the clan leagues
is farcical even by your standards
you sign eligible players to get games done, not bend rules
to suit, account details of 31 days is the required minimum
for any player
but not now
you can jump ship make a new account and play for anyone anytime, sorry I'm making a point and a valid one it is
and btw I have no problems with Pros
its the situation I don't agree with
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:30 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
The fixtures are released, anyone signed now would be unable to play therefor by allowing them to play you would be be bending rules. You contradict your own point over and over but aren't able to understand your doing so which is quite funny.
15:32 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
1) Yes sign players, The LR can't force them to do that
2) Not my forte, as previously mentioned Keith is the LR so he alone decides and personally i would rather allow someone to play than folding. Yes its their fault for signing the player but each situation is different.
3) Thats Underdogs a small clan who doesn't care about winning much so they sign anyone, Pros are a team who only care about winning much like Snooker Squad so they wouldn't try to sign anyone but strong players unless its vital.
4) Its one person but i don't make the decisions. Yeah a rule is slightly broken but its to prevent a clan from folding. Yes they could sign someone not as strong but see points one and three. This is same as point two really.
5) I heard if you do it then you get a season suspension unless you rejoin the clan you was with, if thats the case then its not straight forward.
6) Unfortunate situation, some may say of Pros own making but they can't forsee several things happening at once. The only thing left is a 'loan' so a player from another team can go there long as both captains agree for a period of one fixture set so they have time for more.
Captains can agree to extended periods
2) Not my forte, as previously mentioned Keith is the LR so he alone decides and personally i would rather allow someone to play than folding. Yes its their fault for signing the player but each situation is different.
3) Thats Underdogs a small clan who doesn't care about winning much so they sign anyone, Pros are a team who only care about winning much like Snooker Squad so they wouldn't try to sign anyone but strong players unless its vital.
4) Its one person but i don't make the decisions. Yeah a rule is slightly broken but its to prevent a clan from folding. Yes they could sign someone not as strong but see points one and three. This is same as point two really.
5) I heard if you do it then you get a season suspension unless you rejoin the clan you was with, if thats the case then its not straight forward.
6) Unfortunate situation, some may say of Pros own making but they can't forsee several things happening at once. The only thing left is a 'loan' so a player from another team can go there long as both captains agree for a period of one fixture set so they have time for more.
Captains can agree to extended periods
15:35 Tue 28 Apr 15 (BST) [Link]
Hope you don't mean me mate, i don't make any league decisions, when joining Keith to help out i said i want nothing to do with league decisions, if i did i would have asked Keith if i could take over.
You don't seem to understand that we are all on the same page with allowing the rule for everyone, just the players situation we disagree with.
The fixtures are released, anyone signed now would be unable to play therefor by allowing them to play you would be be bending rules. You contradict your own point over and over but aren't able to understand your doing so which is quite funny.
Hope you don't mean me mate, i don't make any league decisions, when joining Keith to help out i said i want nothing to do with league decisions, if i did i would have asked Keith if i could take over.
You don't seem to understand that we are all on the same page with allowing the rule for everyone, just the players situation we disagree with.
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
FCL - General Discussion
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.