Kanes fourth goal is better

it just isn't better though is it barkley.. no way can you think its better then that, the confidence required to do that and then the ability to pull it off from outside the box when your only 1-0 up and could of easily of been 1-1 at that point..

Real Madrid vs Barcelona - What a match - C'mon RM - 3-1 - Great counter attack 3rd goal by Benzema. Watching Liverpool & Man City- 0-0 vs Hull City & 2-1 (defeat to West Ham LOL) - now RM are a TEAM!!!

Why you laughing at West Ham beating Man City?

Did you forget that Man Utd lost to Leicester City while been 3-1 infront?

I no id rather get beat by West Ham as they are playing really great football from what ive seen of them this season

With the calibre of player Man City can boast and their finances plus the fact they boast to be the best, then when they lose an unexpected match then worth a LOL. Yeah United lost 5-3 and Leicester and West Ham today fully deserved their victories. No dis-service to them but City and United respectively under estimated their opposition.

Always great to see the so called 'minnows' beating the money men.

What sort of calibre of players do Man Utd have then?

Also Man Utd are probably one of the best supported clubs in the world so they have the mega bucks aswell, the last transfer window proved that with spending over 100mill on players and 60ish of of that on one player, please tell me the last team in England to spent 60ish million on one player? So you cant exactly say just Man City have the mega bucks to spend.

I think you got the bit about Man City boasting they are the best, as when you watch Sky Sports News and other sporting channels and they interview the Man Utd fans ALL of them claim that Man Utd are the best club to walk this planet and no other club are better than them at all.

interview any City fan and they think they are the best, bought the league more like. They lost today brings them back down to Earth. United have signed players yes and spent loads but until we have a decent back line then no way are we the best nor deserve to win anything. Without a defence cant defend.

Many people will say that during the 90s and most of the 00s that Man Utd bought the title nearly every year, so why is that different to Man City and Chelsea buying the title nowadays?

For Man Utd to get a decent back line they are going to have to spend EVEN MORE money so that means they are spending mega bucks(which you are claiming Man City are doing), so that is kinda hypocritical of you aint it?

There's a difference between spending out of necessity than spending for the sake of it, which City have done of late. United lost Rio Ferdinand, Nemanja Vidic, Alexander Buttner, Patrice Evra, all in the same transfer window. It is absolutely crucial that these positions be replaced and the way of the market will unfortunately cost spending big money.

I will hope once these have been acquired that will be the end to the big spending, i think in order for United to catch up with Chelsea and Man City though they need to strengthen the squad further. So one more spending window then build and nurture youth.

Already playing Tyler Blackett from Academy, signed Timothy Mofu (16 years), Will Keane out on loan, Nick Powell out of loan, etc - so buliding for the future at the same time.

Nothing hypocritical about building a team, whereas others just buy players for no reason then loan them out (Kurt Zouma (Chelsea - bought & loaned back)), Liverpool - (Origi - Bought & loaned back)). Man City (Bruno Zucculini - Bought & Loaned out)

So what did Man Utd do then during the 90s and upto about 2005? Im pretty sure people will say they bought the best players they could bring in just because of the sake of it. One player springs to mind Juan Sebastian Veron, how many games did he play for Man Utd before they sold him onto Chelsea for a loss of money?

Kurt Zouma was probably brought in for a future replacement for Terry as hes knocking on and for him to get first team experience he ad to go out on loan, Lille put it in the offer that if Liverpool wanted Origi he had to come back on loan to them for a season(which seems to be working out as hes scoring an playing well), Bruno Zucculini is probably in the same conundrum as Kurt Zouma bought for the future of the club and until his time comes he will be out on loan gettin valuable first team experiece.

Doesn't Nick Powell come under the same scrutiny that you have put on the players above? How many games he played for Man Utd since arriving from Crewe for 6 million in the 12/13 season? Also how many games did Wilfred Zaha play for you since his 15 million move in the same season? Bebe also come to mind as he was a waste of money aswell and farmed out on loan, what about Zoran Tosic after his move in 08/09 season for over 5 million?

Newcastle United you little beauty, Who would of predicted that ?

One happy Geordie right here

Very good 1st half United vs Chelsea, Fabregas been kept quiet. More of the same in second half. Few more feedervpasses to RVP and he'll score. Chelsea look a complete different side without Costa.

C'mon United!!!!

Fair result 1-1, No way did united deserve to lose.

Edited at 17:56 Sun 26/10/14 (GMT)

Stoppage time equaliser once again, Looks like Fergie still pays the 4th official for the minutes.

Looked like the refs were paid for the whole game, chelsea should have had a couple of penalties, and I personally don't think that Ivanovic fouled in the last minute.
Typical.

Lol, I agree they maybe should have had one penalty the head lock between Smalling and Ivanovic were as clear as day. The tussle between Rojo and Terry were six of one, half a dozen of the other. Both doing the same to each other.

Ivanovic's first yellow were for desent, lucky he didn't get booked earlier in the game for the same thing. The amount of abuse that guy gave the referee all match is unacceptable. The second yellow were a blatant tread on Di Marias heel watch it again.

Fully deserved sending off, apart from the lateness for the equaliser United and Chelsea were even throughout aso a draw is a fair result. Don't agree with Courtois being the motm as I felt Matic or Blind, even De GEA had better games.

That's my Opinion.

Qpr vs Villa tonight, fancy Qpr to follow up with 2nd consecutive win 2-1. Confidence will be higher now and at home in front of a buzzing atmosphere they will edge it also being on Sky will be a factor.

Do you ever watch football Ash ? Qpr have gone five matches without a win and lost their last outing to liverpool 3-2 so where you get this second consecutive win from is beyond me ?

How does sky make it a factor ? I cannot comprehend some of the rubbish you are coming out with.

I fully expect it to be a close game with neither team really being able to lose, Qpr may try and push too much everyone knows villa's away form is better than at home and has been since martin o neil left us so Qpr being at home isn't that much of an advantage ... just ask liverpool fans.

Lol wow I must have been asleep when writing that last part lol sorry. Yeah I I watch football with Skysports and live stream other channels, thanks for asking.
You don't like what I write...simples...don't read it.

I still think they will win tonight. They didn't deserve to lose 2-3 to Liverpool.

Edited at 13:18 Mon 27/10/14 (GMT)

To be honest Ash I think Matty was asking a serious question as you don't seem to have any idea at all

First costa was the worst signing of the season, then when he proved you wrong it was well he would be nothing without hazard, oscar, Willian etc, now It's Chelsea don't look the same team without Costa, hahahahaha what next

I'll let you know...please hold the line..your call were important to us but quite frankly ain't the patience nor the time. Call back later.

oops sorry did I post that out loud, new laptops and technology these days, shocking.

Lol keep reading the sun and keep us updated with the latest news and transfers!!