Just saying today they had 2 players on peak time, tomorrow they will probably have 3 and i can't see why people are making issues this early in a fixture especially when the format is 2 days old, give your opponents a chance.

They had 3 players on today, one of the players they suggested for the killer game in the team lists aint been on for a month!!!!!!

Anyway cbb having an arguement with a league runner about trying to actually get a game played, which apparently makes me in the wrong!

Cya

But leaving that aside ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Again, are you saying that any game played MUST be 3v3 at any time during the period?

To be fair chris you were talking about a specific scenario one minute then changed your point on me when you realised that they had just meant they would be willing to play with a third.
Would have to be a captain's decision to play a game without the full contingent not the players but yeah rules for that scenario will be added, thanks.

The scenario never changed Either you could play with less than 3 or you couldnt - the circumstances are irrelevant.

And if theres no Captain or Vice Captain online then again it goes to default?

Anyway thanks for agreeing to evolve the rules.

^ going on from that, perhaps a player can play in both games but won't score in the second to make up the numbers.

Scoring something like

2-2 if he wins with no team mates
3-1 if its him and a team mate
4-0 it its all 3 team mates

and if they're not in the top 3 its normal scoring

Nobody can play in both killer games

But they are still capable of affecting the outcome so either you can play in both as normal or you cant.

Both killer games? I was told yesterday there was only one game?!?

The good thing about allowing a 3v3 game to be played as 2v2 (or 3v2 or whatever) is that there's already a built-in punishment in place. Any team that doesn't start with 3 players has no chance of winning 6-0 (since to get a 6-0, the winning team must have all 3 players left).

2 per fixture in normal season, 2 in these friendlies if people want to play 2 but we only require 1 off teams in the pre-seasons.

I agree - was only trying to get the whole thing clarified.

and that wasnt me that said the bit quoted - that was bl3ss3d!!!!

Can't see any problem with it but it would have to be with a captain's permission, can't have people turning around after a game was played and saying they weren't happy for the team to play without 3

Thats easy - if you played the game then by default you have agreed to play.

2 players being persuaded to play a game isn't the captain agreeing or the clan chris.
Captain's post permission for subs if they are going to be offline, they could post permission for a killer game to be played with 2 players too

Oh the old Jedi mind trick again - yeh forgot about that!!

You are in danger of over complicating something straight forward. If thats me being simplistic then I will gladly accept that because experience says thats the best way.

Jesus, getting beyond a joke tonight chris!
Everything is very straight forward you have just spent the night trying to complicate it instead of just getting on with games you're inventing problems where there aren't any.
We've given the format, we've explained it all to death and on the second day since it has been introduced with 2 out of the 5 killer games needed already played now there is a problem with captain's having control of their clans?!
If 2 of our team decided to play a game when there would be 3 on the next day to play it we rightfully wouldn't be happy, if you want to give your players permission to do what they want for the season that is up to you.

Thought this was the new receptive league?

Ive introduced problems that dont exist that you have posted you will need to bring rules in for!! Glad thats sorted - good luck!!

Have you ever read animal farm?