FBL discussion
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Funky Billiards League.
Back to Forum List.
22:20 Thu 7 Jun 12 (BST) [Link] Wait, if they left the game, that would count as them losing surely. Not sure why a new game was started after they left...
edit: oh right, i see what you're saying. That's embarrassing for whoever your opponents were...
But cooperation and conversation between team members is the whole point in team killer
I think you will it does! They picked who they wanted after them which gave them an advantage. Not sure how you can say this doesn't.
edit: oh right, i see what you're saying. That's embarrassing for whoever your opponents were...
But cooperation and conversation between team members is the whole point in team killer
22:48 Thu 7 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Do the decent thing and forget about killer, it is causing nothing but grief and there are a fair few that don't even want to play it.
23:42 Thu 7 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
No, killer has been excellent for everyone except in this single case. So far, everyone who actually played the games enjoyed them immensely. The "grief" has purely been on the threads about theoretical issues.
23:46 Thu 7 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Lol i will keep this to remind you when we have to play you in FBL, i am sure you will be more than accommodating and won't wait for your top players before you play. I predict 6 players out of the 8 in the actual games
No, killer has been excellent for everyone except in this single case. So far, everyone who actually played the games enjoyed them immensely. The "grief" has purely been on the threads about theoretical issues.
Lol i will keep this to remind you when we have to play you in FBL, i am sure you will be more than accommodating and won't wait for your top players before you play. I predict 6 players out of the 8 in the actual games
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:50 Thu 7 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Double-checked to make sure by playing a few games
The order changes once everyone presses play so no chance for anyone to get the order they want by pressing wait and play.
It isn't done in the order that people enter the room it's random.
Once again no order is more beneficial anyway.
The order changes once everyone presses play so no chance for anyone to get the order they want by pressing wait and play.
It isn't done in the order that people enter the room it's random.
Once again no order is more beneficial anyway.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:52 Thu 7 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Lol i will keep this to remind you when we have to play you in FBL, i am sure you will be more than accommodating and won't wait for your top players before you play. I predict 6 players out of the 8 in the actual games
horse voting for 4 v 4 now?
No, killer has been excellent for everyone except in this single case. So far, everyone who actually played the games enjoyed them immensely. The "grief" has purely been on the threads about theoretical issues.
Lol i will keep this to remind you when we have to play you in FBL, i am sure you will be more than accommodating and won't wait for your top players before you play. I predict 6 players out of the 8 in the actual games
horse voting for 4 v 4 now?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:53 Thu 7 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
The fair few that don't want to play it won't play it and the fair few that do want to play it will...16 in a clan and 6 in the games
MVP have 6 players in the top 50 in killer by the way so think you should be ok
Do the decent thing and forget about killer, it is causing nothing but grief and there are a fair few that don't even want to play it.
The fair few that don't want to play it won't play it and the fair few that do want to play it will...16 in a clan and 6 in the games
MVP have 6 players in the top 50 in killer by the way so think you should be ok
00:30 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
7 i was in the top 10 a few months back not played it since then
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:37 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Just saw the post on Fighting Eagles thread where both teams had three available players but one team had only two willing to play at that time.
I think there should be flexibility that if the two want to carry on and play it 3v2 (or whatever) then they should be able to.
Maybe thats already allowed but either way needs clarifying.
I think there should be flexibility that if the two want to carry on and play it 3v2 (or whatever) then they should be able to.
Maybe thats already allowed but either way needs clarifying.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:43 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Can't see that it needs clarifying, it's 3 v 3
Arrange a time when your players are active
Team A will have 3 willing players on some days and Team B won't
Team B will have 3 willing players on some days and Team A won't
Team A and Team B will have 3 willing players each on some days and the games get played then.
Just saw the post on Fighting Eagles thread where both teams had three available players but one team had only two willing to play at that time.
I think there should be flexibility that if the two want to carry on and play it 3v2 (or whatever) then they should be able to.
Maybe thats already allowed but either way needs clarifying.
I think there should be flexibility that if the two want to carry on and play it 3v2 (or whatever) then they should be able to.
Maybe thats already allowed but either way needs clarifying.
Can't see that it needs clarifying, it's 3 v 3
Arrange a time when your players are active
Team A will have 3 willing players on some days and Team B won't
Team B will have 3 willing players on some days and Team A won't
Team A and Team B will have 3 willing players each on some days and the games get played then.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:43 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
So if they dont it goes to default? Even though a game could have been played?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:46 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
There are 14 days in a fixture chris we are on day 4, why should 1 team play with less players?!
The 2 players being willing was obviously meant as willing to play a 3 v 3 ...they just didnt have a third on tonight
So if they dont it goes to default? Even though a game could have been played?
There are 14 days in a fixture chris we are on day 4, why should 1 team play with less players?!
The 2 players being willing was obviously meant as willing to play a 3 v 3 ...they just didnt have a third on tonight
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:49 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Because they opt to to get a game played and out of the way?
And it doesnt matter if its day 4 or 14 surely the guidance is going to need to be the same? You can either play with less than 3 or you cant. Or else you can from a certain point.
And it doesnt matter if its day 4 or 14 surely the guidance is going to need to be the same? You can either play with less than 3 or you cant. Or else you can from a certain point.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:54 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Nobody is going to opt to play a game with a player missing with 10 days to go chris they just meant they would be willing to play if they could get a third player....obviously.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:57 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Can't see that it needs clarifying, it's 3 v 3
Arrange a time when your players are active
Team A will have 3 willing players on some days and Team B won't
Team B will have 3 willing players on some days and Team A won't
Team A and Team B will have 3 willing players each on some days and the games get played then.
Arranging a time to play is not so easy when their players arent on at the same time, and their captain is extremely "unhelpful"!
Just saw the post on Fighting Eagles thread where both teams had three available players but one team had only two willing to play at that time.
I think there should be flexibility that if the two want to carry on and play it 3v2 (or whatever) then they should be able to.
Maybe thats already allowed but either way needs clarifying.
I think there should be flexibility that if the two want to carry on and play it 3v2 (or whatever) then they should be able to.
Maybe thats already allowed but either way needs clarifying.
Can't see that it needs clarifying, it's 3 v 3
Arrange a time when your players are active
Team A will have 3 willing players on some days and Team B won't
Team B will have 3 willing players on some days and Team A won't
Team A and Team B will have 3 willing players each on some days and the games get played then.
Arranging a time to play is not so easy when their players arent on at the same time, and their captain is extremely "unhelpful"!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:59 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Obvious to you maybe - personally I would be happy playing a game with 2 on occasions - and certainly in the last day or two of a period.
Thats not the point though - you have to cover the scenario. At the moment it seems you are saying it must be 3v3 no matter what and no matter when? If thats the case then you will get the scenario when a game goes to default when it could have been played.
Thats not the point though - you have to cover the scenario. At the moment it seems you are saying it must be 3v3 no matter what and no matter when? If thats the case then you will get the scenario when a game goes to default when it could have been played.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
01:12 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Arranging a time to play is not so easy when their players arent on at the same time, and their captain is extremely "unhelpful"!
We give it a week before we even ask for a sub for an inactive player, yet teams are making issues of a 6 man game not getting done at the first time of trying.
Eagles had 5 players on at peak time yesterday, shooters have players on round the clock like we do, they are struggling for numbers at the moment so bare with them a bit.
Try going through gordo we always find he gets games sorted with the minimum fuss.
Arranging a time to play is not so easy when their players arent on at the same time, and their captain is extremely "unhelpful"!
We give it a week before we even ask for a sub for an inactive player, yet teams are making issues of a 6 man game not getting done at the first time of trying.
Eagles had 5 players on at peak time yesterday, shooters have players on round the clock like we do, they are struggling for numbers at the moment so bare with them a bit.
Try going through gordo we always find he gets games sorted with the minimum fuss.
01:12 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link] The players that are on at the arranged times will play. We need to use 6 different players anyway (which I think will be very tough by the way), so no chance to be picky.
Lol i will keep this to remind you when we have to play you in FBL, i am sure you will be more than accommodating and won't wait for your top players before you play. I predict 6 players out of the 8 in the actual games
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
01:14 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link] The players that are on at the arranged times will play. We need to use 6 different players anyway (which I think will be very tough by the way), so no chance to be picky.
That's the idea
Lol i will keep this to remind you when we have to play you in FBL, i am sure you will be more than accommodating and won't wait for your top players before you play. I predict 6 players out of the 8 in the actual games
That's the idea
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
01:14 Fri 8 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Arranging a time to play is not so easy when their players arent on at the same time, and their captain is extremely "unhelpful"!
We give it a week before we even ask for a sub for an inactive player, yet teams are making issues of a 6 man game not getting done at the first time of trying.
Eagles had 5 players on at peak time yesterday, shooters have players on round the clock like we do, they are struggling for numbers at the moment so bare with them a bit.
Try going through gordo we always find he gets games sorted with the minimum fuss.
Tbf the players weve been talking about have been off for 7days around, hardly an issue asking for subs?
Arranging a time to play is not so easy when their players arent on at the same time, and their captain is extremely "unhelpful"!
We give it a week before we even ask for a sub for an inactive player, yet teams are making issues of a 6 man game not getting done at the first time of trying.
Eagles had 5 players on at peak time yesterday, shooters have players on round the clock like we do, they are struggling for numbers at the moment so bare with them a bit.
Try going through gordo we always find he gets games sorted with the minimum fuss.
Tbf the players weve been talking about have been off for 7days around, hardly an issue asking for subs?
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
FBL discussion
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Funky Billiards League.
Back to Forum List.