League Discussion Thread...
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.
18:46 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link] 
who am i today ???
i dont know !!!!!
im an account manager !!!
REALLYYYYYYYYY !!!!
ermmmmmmmmmmmmmm ive so many jobs
lets just sing a song or make a tuuuuuuuune
la llaaa llaaa laaaaa la laaa la la la good this
who am i today ???
i dont know !!!!!
im an account manager !!!
REALLYYYYYYYYY !!!!
ermmmmmmmmmmmmmm ive so many jobs
lets just sing a song or make a tuuuuuuuune
la llaaa llaaa laaaaa la laaa la la la good this
18:52 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link] 
oooooh noooooo its idea time
anyways back on topic ive had enough
to many double standards i loved melody with all my heart
oooooh noooooo its idea time
anyways back on topic ive had enough
to many double standards i loved melody with all my heart
18:58 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
brought to new page
dgeneratio said:
dgeneratio said:
there is an important discussion i wish to share with you though and i want Jay and Jem's attention on this one.
Clearly the rule about 2nd account has not sunk into people but there is a loophole as we have seen already this season which allows you to have 2 usernames in the league if they aren't in the list at the same time.
for instance, early this season someone deactivated and then came back under a new name this fixture (still equals one account) but heres my idea. to cut second accounts even more i suggest only ONE account can enter and play in the league.
e.g. Player A deactivates during fixture set 2
Player A comes back during fixture set 5 under a new name
if my idea would be implemented as Player A already played a fixture earlier in the season then they couldn't play on this new username for remainder of the season.
i am not expecting everyone to like this or even to agree with me but thought id put the idea across (bare in mind this seasons rules would stay the same)
thoughts?
Clearly the rule about 2nd account has not sunk into people but there is a loophole as we have seen already this season which allows you to have 2 usernames in the league if they aren't in the list at the same time.
for instance, early this season someone deactivated and then came back under a new name this fixture (still equals one account) but heres my idea. to cut second accounts even more i suggest only ONE account can enter and play in the league.
e.g. Player A deactivates during fixture set 2
Player A comes back during fixture set 5 under a new name
if my idea would be implemented as Player A already played a fixture earlier in the season then they couldn't play on this new username for remainder of the season.
i am not expecting everyone to like this or even to agree with me but thought id put the idea across (bare in mind this seasons rules would stay the same)
thoughts?
brought to new page
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:03 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
I still dont believe me changing name is a big deal, I think it would be different circumstances if I had done this to change clans, which some players have. I would consider that was of deactivation to use the loophole.
19:03 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
about scoreline with double accounts, should the result stand?, should the banning team be forced to sub out with the game being replayed?
Quote found on snooker for defaults team:
Jay and Jem thoughts on this also? not asking public as they would downgrade the idea because it came from "snooker" just remembered it was discussed over there and ties in with all this.
Quote found on snooker for defaults team:
slatty said:
The trouble with allowing the sub is that the player may get the ban towards the end of the fixture.
whocares8x8 said:
True. How about the sub is made anyway and if it doesn't get played, the default will be done as if the opponent hasn't been available before the sub.
That was a bad explanation lol. Example:
Player B gets banned after playing the game and we know with almost certainty (decided by defaults team) that it was a duplicate account. 2 days before the deadline, the team put another player in to play the fixture, but it doesn't get played and goes to defaults. It will count as if the player who was subbed in was offline until the time the sub was made. That way, the default is heavily in favor of the clan without the banned player.
That was a bad explanation lol. Example:
Player B gets banned after playing the game and we know with almost certainty (decided by defaults team) that it was a duplicate account. 2 days before the deadline, the team put another player in to play the fixture, but it doesn't get played and goes to defaults. It will count as if the player who was subbed in was offline until the time the sub was made. That way, the default is heavily in favor of the clan without the banned player.
Jay and Jem thoughts on this also? not asking public as they would downgrade the idea because it came from "snooker" just remembered it was discussed over there and ties in with all this.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:04 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
thoughts are player A shouldnt be able to play for however long new users cant play in a clan for am not to sure how long that is....was it a user had to have their account for a month ?
19:06 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
a month yeah but league lasts 3 times as long.
red4ever said:
thoughts are player A shouldnt be able to play for however long new users cant play in a clan for am not to sure how long that is....was it a user had to have their account for a month ?
a month yeah but league lasts 3 times as long.
19:44 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Craig these pics are getting boring now and have nothing to do with league discussions, anymore will be removed.
20:12 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
they have everything to do with my discussion
you say will be removed which forum rule are they breaking
please let me know on this thread or via offline message
id suggest as a moderator you shoud check the quote on diamonds jems post page 76 unbeatables thread
thats offensive
and again please explain what forum rules im breaking for reference.....PLEASE
im sure you finding my posts boring or anyone else for that matter isnt a breach of forum rules or have i missed one
ab_rfc said:
Craig these pics are getting boring now and have nothing to do with league discussions, anymore will be removed.
they have everything to do with my discussion
you say will be removed which forum rule are they breaking
please let me know on this thread or via offline message
id suggest as a moderator you shoud check the quote on diamonds jems post page 76 unbeatables thread
thats offensive
and again please explain what forum rules im breaking for reference.....PLEASE
im sure you finding my posts boring or anyone else for that matter isnt a breach of forum rules or have i missed one
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:24 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
I am going to look at this thread when i return from the shop... please can people only post constructively on this thread, thanks
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
22:00 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
I like the idea for one account per person for league entry also like the idea brought over from snooker (Sebs post), think that would work
22:08 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
they have everything to do with my discussion
But they aren't relevant to the thread - it's spamming (well to be a bit more specific it's hijacking another thread). You surely know this?
doubted2 said:
ab_rfc said:
Craig these pics are getting boring now and have nothing to do with league discussions, anymore will be removed.
they have everything to do with my discussion
But they aren't relevant to the thread - it's spamming (well to be a bit more specific it's hijacking another thread). You surely know this?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
22:09 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Yes but Nick, your mods are picking up on this yet it took the admins 24 hours to get rid of someone that was beyond bullying a person.. Makes me laugh.
Edit: Oh and please keep on topic Nick
^^ hypocritical but had to say it
Edited at 20:17 Sun 08/01/12 (GMT)
Edit: Oh and please keep on topic Nick
^^ hypocritical but had to say it
Edited at 20:17 Sun 08/01/12 (GMT)
22:13 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
they got rid of them in the end though spoon but that topic is past lets talk about something else
and hello nick, not everyday you see an admin post here
and hello nick, not everyday you see an admin post here
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
22:22 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
well it was a bit of a joke how long it took and how many people had to complain before anything was done... but seems to have been sorted... for now
22:23 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
they have everything to do with my discussion
But they aren't relevant to the thread - it's spamming (well to be a bit more specific it's hijacking another thread). You surely know this?
well thanks for that nick
hijacking i better take note of that
but its ok to have 2 accounts and swear your head off
its called harmless fun however point taken
i lost my posting rights for half of whats been on these threads over the last few days and also have a ban hanging over my head
i hope these comments are now relevant on all threads from today
nick said:
doubted2 said:
ab_rfc said:
Craig these pics are getting boring now and have nothing to do with league discussions, anymore will be removed.
they have everything to do with my discussion
But they aren't relevant to the thread - it's spamming (well to be a bit more specific it's hijacking another thread). You surely know this?
well thanks for that nick
hijacking i better take note of that
but its ok to have 2 accounts and swear your head off
its called harmless fun however point taken
i lost my posting rights for half of whats been on these threads over the last few days and also have a ban hanging over my head
i hope these comments are now relevant on all threads from today
22:26 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
like i said before craig use contact us if you have a problem with funky rules and contact me, jem or jay if its a league issue, if its still the angel thing then one is deactivated so personally i don't see the issue.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
22:28 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
If she is in the same clan and not deactivating to get round the swapping clan rule.. i see no problem either.
Noticed Nick aint hit back yet
Noticed Nick aint hit back yet
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
22:32 Sun 8 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
its against fp rules to have multiple accounts ... hmmm
| Unable to post | |
|---|---|
| Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
League Discussion Thread...
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.