League Discussion Thread...
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:50 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Im sure favouritism would come into play there Jon, complaints of only puttin certains players in team A cuz they are "better"..then again, could work the opposite way, put the "better" players in team B so they face the "weaker" players in the B league
Edited at 15:59 Wed 04/01/12 (GMT)
Edited at 15:59 Wed 04/01/12 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:52 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
I think adding A & B teams to clans would cause an awful lot more work for League Runners, you have to remember that there is a lot of admin behind the scenes for things like this to happen
Do not agree with a single big league, clans constantly failing to get out the bottom would give up and fold. At least having a Div 1 and Div 2 it gives people something to work for - being promoted and avoid being demoted between divisions
Do not agree with a single big league, clans constantly failing to get out the bottom would give up and fold. At least having a Div 1 and Div 2 it gives people something to work for - being promoted and avoid being demoted between divisions
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:54 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
But don't the bigger clans have the better players anyways?
I'm just saying i would like to see A and B teams so gives captains a chance to play the players who currently aint being involved
Surely captains shouldn't sign players they don't think are good enough for the teams division so everyone should be getting games anyway.
People want to challenge themselves and should get a chance to not be stuck in a B team.
I remember signing no1hustl3r from the 'cobras waiting list' and him smashing davybaumers from cobras 10-5...would rather have things like that happening than him sat in the B team.
wonderman said:
bluenose1872 said:
Jon - we could do that but then people would start moaning as "the bigger clans" have all the best players or what not.
But don't the bigger clans have the better players anyways?
I'm just saying i would like to see A and B teams so gives captains a chance to play the players who currently aint being involved
Surely captains shouldn't sign players they don't think are good enough for the teams division so everyone should be getting games anyway.
People want to challenge themselves and should get a chance to not be stuck in a B team.
I remember signing no1hustl3r from the 'cobras waiting list' and him smashing davybaumers from cobras 10-5...would rather have things like that happening than him sat in the B team.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:55 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
I wouldnt touch the league format mate, its worked ever since ive been on the clan scene...as for the cup, yeah i wouldnt personally complain about that one
Providing the good reliable player, actually is a reliable player..down the captains judgement i guess but yeah could help...but if teams had 15 reliable players in the first place, wouldnt be a problem...dont get me wrong, im on ur side with this one, but i think someone will always have somethin bad to say about the extra player
bluenose1872 said:
Ant,
The cup team format this season is:
5 v 5 (Until Semi Final)
7 v7 (Semi)
9 v 9 (Final)
Many are liking this current set up, but now want to decrease the frames in the cup from 15 to 9.
The cup team format this season is:
5 v 5 (Until Semi Final)
7 v7 (Semi)
9 v 9 (Final)
Many are liking this current set up, but now want to decrease the frames in the cup from 15 to 9.
I wouldnt touch the league format mate, its worked ever since ive been on the clan scene...as for the cup, yeah i wouldnt personally complain about that one
diamond_jem said:
I think 16 was the right choice Jay, we do not want to start increasing clans too much, that could lead to problems.
Ant, there will always be problems with players not being online, unfortunately it happens to the best clans but i think having 1 additional member to the clan could be a real help if you picked a good reliable player.
Ant, there will always be problems with players not being online, unfortunately it happens to the best clans but i think having 1 additional member to the clan could be a real help if you picked a good reliable player.
Providing the good reliable player, actually is a reliable player..down the captains judgement i guess but yeah could help...but if teams had 15 reliable players in the first place, wouldnt be a problem...dont get me wrong, im on ur side with this one, but i think someone will always have somethin bad to say about the extra player
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:56 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
that stop a lot of people making new clans as well and give them a better chance of getting a few good players
also did not like your comment the best teams smash the lower teams
let me tell you one thing i have some good players that get in a team
as for myself like a few in my team would give any player a run for they money
wonderman said:
Agreed Big_mouse, would stop BIG teams folding them coming back and smashing div 2
that stop a lot of people making new clans as well and give them a better chance of getting a few good players
also did not like your comment the best teams smash the lower teams
let me tell you one thing i have some good players that get in a team
as for myself like a few in my team would give any player a run for they money
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:00 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
So the smaller teams would then get "smashed" by most of the division one sides? How is that fairer than it is now.
wat a joke of a comment
bluenose1872 said:
wonderman said:
Agreed Big_mouse, would stop BIG teams folding them coming back and smashing div 2
So the smaller teams would then get "smashed" by most of the division one sides? How is that fairer than it is now.
wat a joke of a comment
18:01 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Where in that did i even mention your team Rick? jesus christ you have some sort of vendetta against me as of late. Getting sick of it. Anymore of your useless comments about me being "rude or whatever" to you and your team i will ignore. Trying to sort the league out for next season not waste my time answering you and your stupid comments aimed at me.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:01 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
So the smaller teams would then get "smashed" by most of the division one sides? How is that fairer than it is now.
wat a joke of a comment
Hardly
big_mouse said:
bluenose1872 said:
wonderman said:
Agreed Big_mouse, would stop BIG teams folding them coming back and smashing div 2
So the smaller teams would then get "smashed" by most of the division one sides? How is that fairer than it is now.
wat a joke of a comment
Hardly
18:02 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Rick since your on this thread more than your own check TPA thread and answer my question so i can tell Shooters.
thanks
Also anyone know Individuals format this season so i can update, if not i guess ill have to award it to the person ahead last time techno updated it
thanks
Also anyone know Individuals format this season so i can update, if not i guess ill have to award it to the person ahead last time techno updated it
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:02 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
to be fair m8 it aint just the big teams folding and making new clans....clans are folding and basically keeping most the same players but changing names dont see the point in this.
as to the size of clans its been changed enough if 15 players aint sufficient enough to get 2 fixtures played clans shouldnt be playing in the league
as to the size of clans its been changed enough if 15 players aint sufficient enough to get 2 fixtures played clans shouldnt be playing in the league
18:07 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
no im not mmmmmmm
antione08 said:
Just a quick question, incase im confused..Craig, are you seriously suggesting clans havin 20 players?
no im not mmmmmmm
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:07 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
some lower teams would get smash to be honest i don't think that being funny by anyone standards if lower teams see this it unfair on them it don't say a lot for them i have the right to my opinion like every one else that is unfair statement
bluenose1872 said:
Where in that did i even mention your team Rick? jesus christ you have some sort of vendetta against me as of late. Getting sick of it. Anymore of your useless comments about me being "rude or whatever" to you and your team i will ignore. Trying to sort the league out for next season not waste my time answering you and your stupid comments aimed at me.
some lower teams would get smash to be honest i don't think that being funny by anyone standards if lower teams see this it unfair on them it don't say a lot for them i have the right to my opinion like every one else that is unfair statement
18:08 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
like most of whats being talked about
REALLLLLLY
diamond_jem said:
following on from ant... AND a reserve team of 9?
dreamland
dreamland
like most of whats being talked about
REALLLLLLY
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:08 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
no im not mmmmmmm
Thats all i wanted to know mate, u can get back to complaining now lol enjoy ur evening
doubted2 said:
antione08 said:
Just a quick question, incase im confused..Craig, are you seriously suggesting clans havin 20 players?
no im not mmmmmmm
Thats all i wanted to know mate, u can get back to complaining now lol enjoy ur evening
18:09 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Clan size for next season has been increased by one. From 15 to 16 it won't be increased by any more.
didnt ask for that either
why increase
it means even more people twiddling
the mouse
bluenose1872 said:
antione08 said:
Just a quick question, incase im confused..Craig, are you seriously suggesting clans havin 20 players?
Clan size for next season has been increased by one. From 15 to 16 it won't be increased by any more.
didnt ask for that either
why increase
it means even more people twiddling
the mouse
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:10 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Rick, having division 2 gives new/"lower" clans a chance to prove their worth and maybe encourage some heavyweight players to join them if they succeed in doing so. Taking division 2 away from these clans would keep top players at the top because, of course, we all want to be on a winning team!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:11 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
And Craig, reasons for the increase can be found at the top of the last page. Whether you asked for it or not is irrelevant, its happening!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:20 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
15 player 16 games still a chance to give everybody a game....the 1 player addition pretty pointless imo
diamond_jem said:
8 games per fixture 2 fixtures at a time = 16 games... 16 players...potentially a chance to give everyone 1 game
15 player 16 games still a chance to give everybody a game....the 1 player addition pretty pointless imo
18:20 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
dont see any reason at all to increase the size of teams
to win a league you cant play all 15 players anyway or to even have a chance, all clans play their best players or am i wrong,, and all clans have weaker players dont they
Remember this its all about winning no matter who you are
no one likes to get beat and be happy about it
if this wasnt competitive why do all the so called best players join successful teams. and not division 2 teams its all about testing yourself
to win a league you cant play all 15 players anyway or to even have a chance, all clans play their best players or am i wrong,, and all clans have weaker players dont they
Remember this its all about winning no matter who you are
no one likes to get beat and be happy about it
if this wasnt competitive why do all the so called best players join successful teams. and not division 2 teams its all about testing yourself
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:24 Wed 4 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
15 player 16 games still a chance to give everybody a game....the 1 player addition pretty pointless imo
Exactly! Players want 2 games a fixture and people were actually a lot more active with their clans when it was 12 in a clan.
Plus that is another whole clan worth of players unnecessarily added to clan's squads.
red4ever said:
diamond_jem said:
8 games per fixture 2 fixtures at a time = 16 games... 16 players...potentially a chance to give everyone 1 game
15 player 16 games still a chance to give everybody a game....the 1 player addition pretty pointless imo
Exactly! Players want 2 games a fixture and people were actually a lot more active with their clans when it was 12 in a clan.
Plus that is another whole clan worth of players unnecessarily added to clan's squads.
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
League Discussion Thread...
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.