1st division table from the last set looks wrong to me.
Wolf Pack completed all 4 games with no defaults according to the results but only got 30 bonus points instead of 40.
It's got 1 default by ours and wolf pack's names and it was the top dogs vs mouseketeers game that had 2 defaults but other bonuses seem right.

wolf pack did have a default it was eggfriedrice only 1 frame went to default ill ask liam to take a look anyway as division 1 is liams forty

Edited at 13:43 Sun 11/12/11 (GMT)

Ah right so if mouseketeers still got their no defaults bonus from that match then it's right, just not down as a default on the site

yeah ive had problems editing the defaults site lately, will try later

It should be right I posted on all threads asking if anything was wrong 5 days ago and nothing was said but will double check it next week some time

As I said if it was decided mouseketeers should still get the match completion bonus points from their wolf pack game then it's right.

Could limit a loaned player/quarantine lifting to cases where the clan is short on players which takes them under 7 players for that fixture, and the loan/quarantine lift takes them to the 8 players (and force them to nominate the inactive people to become ineligible for that fixture, so they don't gain an unfair advantage if they become active again)

Rules are never changed during a season, except in extreme circumstances. Suggestions for rule changes for future seasons may be posted on the FunkyPool forum or sent to the league hosts directly - input and opinions are encouraged!

League Hosts reserve the right to make any changes to the rules they see fit but normally rules are never changed during seasons

ive got to agree with lee on this

we are changing rules to suit

teams have folded before,, ive said already 15 players 2 weeks there is no excuse for games not getting played

boot players who dont get games played, that is the problem
a whole team gets penalised for unrealible players

you relaxed the 2 month rule to 1 month what do you expect
reliability i think not in 1 month

players with one season playing experience qualifies you to be a clan captain
,
should that not be one season as a vice captain before you can make a clan

we see players with one seasons playing experience running clans are we surprised teams fold,

then we will have reliable players in clans , this is somthing that is being missed ,, dont bend rules to suit, life is made so easy for new clans to form in the first place

and now loan players etc jeeeez

can we all just not abide by the rules now and enforce them

and again players banned can use previous experience on banned accounts

under new names to qulaify to run clans

come on ppl

if your account says 1 month old it is 1 month old it isnt 3 years old

lets start just using existing rules

what so i could captain a clan?

according to the kev04 situation not only could you captain you could also run the league

and there are others

this season no_talking ---- is now big_mouse he didnt have 1 seasons experience under his user name was allowed to captain and as i say there are others

but that isnt the debate im just answering you spoonie without setting a new debate going

Edited at 18:14 Sun 11/12/11 (GMT)

explain please?

i needed someone who is good with code and formulas so they could help me update fortunately spoonie and liam offered

haha ohh, you mean me

I offered, by all means if you have a problem with me being in the league staff then say it, im happy to step down if others feel that way

iv no problem with spoonie or liam dont get you

this was regards clan captains having no experience on current accounts

who mentioned liam and spoonie

you have why ????

because i fall under the category you just said.. thats why he mentioned me.

didnt no ur a clan captain

are you

I have no problems long as we know they have had that season experience they can captain


because you mentioned about captains and league runners, also i didn't notice your edit as i was writing it before the edit

I see my name mentioned????

Im innocent untill proved otherwise

Laughing here why is that subject about experience been brought up yet again? that had been dealt with ages ago!