End of the day, this other guy has quit again, meaning most likely that instead of maybe pulling points back in the following frames, lost both fixtures to nil.

And if it was my player, I'd stand by them if they'd agreed to play that way, obviously both players would have thought they'd have a good chance if winning.

And that is why none of our players will be put in a situation were 2 games are to be played by the same opponent. From now on subs will be made.

I'm going to put the next bit in capitals as no one seems to be listening.

I DO NOT DOUBT BEEN IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM!

As everything that could be said has been said I will refrain from this ludicrous situation and await, and will accept what Chris has to say on this matter. I thank you (Takes a bow, doffs the cap)

No offence to anyone, but no proof from either player. My team mate has also said he clearly did not understand the suggestion made by been. Cannot see how a decision can be made in favour of either player. If playing by the book, the decision should be based on factual evidence not trust or faith in a particular player, about as nonsequential as thinking a god built the earth in 6 days.

End.

On that note: Let's leave it there, and see what chris' verdict is. Every one is entitled to their opinion, doesn't make anyone's right or wrong.

Whatever chris decides we will adhere too.

The proof is him saying he agreed to it is it not? I'm no lawyer but I'm pretty sure that would stand up in a court of law.

what if chris decides to deactivate?

whatever .. be gone from my thread and never come back.

tool should of stayed deactivated.

miss_pots has a game with kris from baize burners but kris says he cant arrange agame with him case hes been deactivated can we have a sub please

Sorry, but a simple regurgitation of the possible excuses given by his teammates is clearly an attempt at trying to say he didn't rage quit because he was 9-0 down.

He didn't explain it properly? So why would you agree if you thought there was any doubt. If someone asked me and I agreed to playing any way different to the norm then I would repeat it so it was clear what was happening.

Besides, if they were just going to play the 9 in a row of each type they would have to specify which type they were playing first and second, which he clearly didn't mention. If I were new, I would want to just play them separately.

He has given no apology to been for calling him a cheat, no explanation as to why he called him that or why he left after one game type (which sounds more plausible than the 5th of 9 frames. He has gone on the attack of been again.

I think it is fairly obvious that he knew full well what he agreed to and is playing innocent because he got shown up. He has admitted he agreed to it (probably because he knew if he denied it then his word against been's would lose every time) and there's no way he would've played it not having a clue what been meant or with him misleading him. I think it would be a mockery if it didn't stand at 5-0 and 4-0 respectively.

Mutual agreement, no rules broken and a rage quit all point one way.

exactly 100%

LOL

If it was the other way round 100% they would not be moaning and I highly doubt our team would they need get a grip and saying they didn't understand making them look a bigger turd!!!

ur a gd player and all mate. but why would u even suggest it? i mean, its all nice and easy, so.....LETS mess IT UP a bit?

No swearing on the forums please

Edited by forum moderator crazzymadman, at 08:05 Tue 05/08/14 (BST)

Mate, if change didn't happen, we would still be living in rocks and hunting for food with a spear.

I am not saying I would play that way, but obnoxious agreed to it, and now should stand by his error of judgment in thinking he could beat Been.

they are the same game type, a win in one doesn't mean a win in the other, it saves a lot of time, it's a long format so still a fair reflection of play. Can't really see a problem with either playing it that way but more specifically asking for it as the opposition of course could say no. Mess it up? What's messy. Seems very easy to understand to me. You play 4 for both and add one.....ooftt that is right messy.

I wouldn't of accepted each win count for both games but he accepted it so the result should stand, obviously been suggested it save playing 2 matches that's just common sense kris

FCL vs Pros: - Subbed in bigcjl2 (prev obnoxious) vs beenjammin (0-5)

SL vs Pros B - Subbed in __emz__ (prev the__tornado) vs miss_pots (deactivated)

^^^ Sub required for miss_pots - thanks. ^^^

Edited at 13:36 Tue 05/08/14 (BST)

He did admit that he were unaware what the actual agreement were so on that premise could be construed as misrepresentation which consequentially could render current scorelines as null and void.

We are happy for the 0-5 to remain as there is solid evidence these frames have been won fair and square. We have acted appropriately, subbed in bigcjl2 to complete the match.

Player has been removed from the team list and we all move on. With regards to the SL davybaumers has been subbed in to commence from 0-0 unless told otherwise.

firstly using big words doesn't make you sound clever. By using misrepresentation you are basically saying Been lied or tricked your wally. That is not what's being said in either reports, one being your player agreed to it and the other being your player got it wrong, An admission on his part. So you have one captain saying you agree to it and then argument ash saying you don't. Your played screwed up and in turn screwed you over. It should be the current score in both games, been should claim the rest so it's a complete whitewash as your player spat the dummy, and you should accept that. You obviously think everyone stupid if you expect anyone to believe your player didn't know what the were doing, Wrong.