As far as I'm concerned deliberate couplers can choke on their own tongues.

Just to clarify, any such impression taken is incorrect.

FCL - Final Fixture Set before the split

Monkey Business v Pocket Dynamos
The Unbeatables v Uprising
Wolf Pack v The Professionals
Underdogs v Phoenix Storm

Please can team lists be provided for these games ahead of them being released on Sunday.

Thanks

Are you, or are u related to dennis thatcher?

"Am I or am I"??? Do I not get an exit strategy from that one??

Hey guys I do'nt like the rule that with a partial played game a team has to remove a player from the team to make a sub.
Wouldn't it be better if the player who left the game was 5 days offline the team can make a sub with the other team agrees?
As we have the same situation with underdogs and would happily let another player play.

Hi league runners this whole clan leagues has become a joke down to 3 or 4 stupid people who get personal and nasty cheat and manipulate clan to there advantages plays for defaults imposable to sort with.

i will be folding ballbreakers unless u find someone to run and leaving this site i not only person who fill like this i know of several players who do just hope they got guts to stand up and be counted too.

chris i glad u back in charge but its too little to late site gone to pop.

Agreed Kenny. I know several players that are thinking of leaving the site because the said 3 or 4 players. The ones that remain are looking at taking matters into their hands and taking action. Enough is enough.

agree with everything he said league has changed since i first started and not for the better sorry but how i feel

The reason behind the rule is to stop a player that is losing simply leaving the game and the clan then replacing them with another (maybe better) one to complete the unplayed racks. There needs to be sanction against any player leaving a game like that, and being removed from the clan is that sanction.

However the rule of allowing any game to be replayed as long as both clans agree is an alternative solution that has been used a couple of times. As long as League Runners have the right to refuse to allow this if it is believed to be an abuse, or to the detriment of any third party clan, I don't necessarily see a problem.

Obviously a separate rule exists in SL which allows a replacement player to be subbed in at any point but does not allow them to score any further points for the clan in that game.

I have an idea on change that could wipe out much of the common reasons for dispute in a single strike but I won't put it out there yet until its been discussed internally first.

Can I say my idea about any new players having to reveal previous user names was a serious one.

I thimk you should reveal it now Chris. Might save a load of people from quitting the site and clans folding.

I like this idea actually, but too many people will lie.

Like you, Ant and Ash did, you mean?

There is certainly merit in it. I have always felt it unfair for someone on a secret new name to play an established opponent. They will be prepared for the style of play of that opponent whereas the reverse is obviously not going to be true. That potentially gives a major advantage allowing a kind of funky ambush to take place!!.

Clearly there are far wider issues regarding enforcing any such rule though, unless it was done completely voluntarily. And of course even then not everyone would comply and often there would be no way of knowing either way anyway.

What is your infatuation with me? Quite disturbing really, my account is and has always ever been: krazyash_07.

No Mav the reason I kept my identity secret was because of gremlins that can't grow up and MOVE ON!

Agreed but I also feel everyone could be given the benefit of the doubt. You get asked if you had previous user names, if you choose to lie or not tell the truth even then you are barred for life. Any time you are found out to be a previous user then you get thrown out and all points you gained for your team removed. would stop captains knowing and keeping schtum as well.

Is there any issues with privacy connected to onevisit's idea?