therev got banned for having ago at Sarah and Craig was before a default decision but the ban happened after the default was announced.

hes reinstated i think.

and the second time which drove me off the edge was when horse questioned a default decision and he got a warning for it which was unjustified.

soooo on that note... look at my killer defaults idea

So Sarah gave 1 banning and 1 warning? Craig didnt?

And you believe that Craig had nothing to do with that banning? and that it's nothing to do with the fact that Craig didn't like Therev and Sarah listened to her boyfriend?

and with Horse your right he got a warning, but simply because Craig had an issue with him.

not sure if theres a concrete way to do defaults to be honest, if you had jans activity tracker you could see who was on at arranged time but for 32 people its not really worth it to do manually.

Whether Craig did or didnt, your assuming he did and said he did when infact it was Sarah who handed out a ban (and maybe a warning, still waitin on dgeneratio to answer )

yeah the warning was given but the reason why i said it was unjustified is that he was wondering if the panel got correct score and reasoning, in my view that doesn't deserve a warning when it could have been sorted by offline message

Im unsure on what went on but Craig was accused of making a banning and giving out a warning, justified or not, it wasnt Craig, it was infact Sarah

Edited at 17:35 Tue 05/06/12 (BST)

This kid knows a lot for been a "new" user that "doesnt" read the the forums, i wonder who this guy actually is

Craig was the main catalyst in the entire situation though. And at end of the day the whole thing is in the past. Craigs gone, Sarah's gone, let us get on with the league so that you lot can play in it.

Wonder as much as you like mate,

After speaking to Sarah personally i was told to read through the forums to find out why.

But you accused Craig of doing something he didnt do, he probably has been the main catalyst but he didnt do the things you claim

We dont want to limit the days down to teams arranging for one day when you have 14 days to play and most clans have at least 5 active every evening so (without discussing with the others) would think that...

We've agreed 9 pm with our opponents we've posted on 7/14 days at 8.30 that we are good to play that evening and they haven't posted once that they have players on and willing...
6-0 with no default bonus to us

We've posted 7/14 days, they have on the other 7/14 and its all genuine misses 3-3

We've been ready to play and posted so 8 times they have 2 then we get a 5-1

6 times and they have 3 then a 4-2

along those lines is the way I see it, should work out easier to judge than normal defaults to be honest because it's just a straight number of days you have had players to play.
Course if we post 7 times in a fortnight then the game is gonna get played without a doubt anyway.

How do you know he never done the things he has been claimed of doing though? You don't.

Even if he did in fact do them he could of just been hiding behind Sarah as she was head league runner. It is up to runners who gets banned or put on a warning, it is up to the head runner to inform the player in question.

Considering the fact I am good friends with Sarah and Id spoke to her about it recently, the banning was by Sarah, not Craig, and dgenertio has informed me Sarah also gave the warning, not Craig either. So you will find I do know he hasnt done the things that hes been accused of on this occasion.

i was just thinking that lol he didnt know who was banned then knew that you was banned yourself 100%

Again what is to stop that person lying about things like that.

Good friends or not, or for any relationship in fact someone can say something to you and you believe what they say but in fact they could actually be lying. It is clear you trust who ever though and trust their word and are entitled to your own opinion but so are others.

See, assumptions again, no 100% factual proof

and mrmtp, if you read my post above yours, you will see I have spoke to Sarah recently about it.

*sighs* it seems no matter who the runners are we are always going to have arguements but for you to come on here and claim that you are new and u have spose to Sarah recently is a little bit of a joke I also spoke to Sarah recently but it's no big deal.