FBL discussion
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Funky Billiards League.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:06 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Kinda odd. Erm no that was never the problem with Craig. When he started handing out bans and speaking to members like they were pieces of dirt. THAT was the problem.
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
Also Craig never handed out bans as far as im aware, was Sarah who did.
Obviously retaliating to Craigs way with words was a necessity instead of speaking to Sarah directly.
Thats not aimed at one person, just generally speaking
So Craig being part of league staff isnt the problem, but him actually openly admitting he is league staff and actually speaking is the problem.
Ok its all clear now, just wondered what the problem is, but now thats been cleared up its ok
Ok its all clear now, just wondered what the problem is, but now thats been cleared up its ok
Kinda odd. Erm no that was never the problem with Craig. When he started handing out bans and speaking to members like they were pieces of dirt. THAT was the problem.
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
Also Craig never handed out bans as far as im aware, was Sarah who did.
Obviously retaliating to Craigs way with words was a necessity instead of speaking to Sarah directly.
Thats not aimed at one person, just generally speaking
20:09 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
All the shooters players are coming out on the defense
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:09 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Kinda odd. Erm no that was never the problem with Craig. When he started handing out bans and speaking to members like they were pieces of dirt. THAT was the problem.
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
Also Craig never handed out bans as far as im aware, was Sarah who did.
Obviously retaliating to Craigs way with words was a necessity instead of speaking to Sarah directly.
Thats not aimed at one person, just generally speaking
Your right he has always done that, hence the reason why i say that he was never suitable to be a league runner. He's always been very arrogant and has no idea how to actually talk to people.
spoke to Sarah directly and it was evident nothing was going to change. Your literally just reiterating facts that have already been brought up. Craig never handed out the bans but it's odd how the people who question Craig, get banned dont you think?
So Craig being part of league staff isnt the problem, but him actually openly admitting he is league staff and actually speaking is the problem.
Ok its all clear now, just wondered what the problem is, but now thats been cleared up its ok
Ok its all clear now, just wondered what the problem is, but now thats been cleared up its ok
Kinda odd. Erm no that was never the problem with Craig. When he started handing out bans and speaking to members like they were pieces of dirt. THAT was the problem.
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
Also Craig never handed out bans as far as im aware, was Sarah who did.
Obviously retaliating to Craigs way with words was a necessity instead of speaking to Sarah directly.
Thats not aimed at one person, just generally speaking
Your right he has always done that, hence the reason why i say that he was never suitable to be a league runner. He's always been very arrogant and has no idea how to actually talk to people.
spoke to Sarah directly and it was evident nothing was going to change. Your literally just reiterating facts that have already been brought up. Craig never handed out the bans but it's odd how the people who question Craig, get banned dont you think?
20:10 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
for me thats reason why i didn't trust him as a runner as he used to argue with quite a lot of members on the site.
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
for me thats reason why i didn't trust him as a runner as he used to argue with quite a lot of members on the site.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:10 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
My phone makes me seem a bit of an eejit when in posting lol :( I hate iPhones :-)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:10 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Kinda odd. Erm no that was never the problem with Craig. When he started handing out bans and speaking to members like they were pieces of dirt. THAT was the problem.
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
Also Craig never handed out bans as far as im aware, was Sarah who did.
Obviously retaliating to Craigs way with words was a necessity instead of speaking to Sarah directly.
Thats not aimed at one person, just generally speaking
Because when Craig was officially league staff, he had the power to do things he didnt have when he was unofficial.
I actually approached Sarah about Craigs attitude towards me and she never replied or spoke to him about it.
So Craig being part of league staff isnt the problem, but him actually openly admitting he is league staff and actually speaking is the problem.
Ok its all clear now, just wondered what the problem is, but now thats been cleared up its ok
Ok its all clear now, just wondered what the problem is, but now thats been cleared up its ok
Kinda odd. Erm no that was never the problem with Craig. When he started handing out bans and speaking to members like they were pieces of dirt. THAT was the problem.
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
Also Craig never handed out bans as far as im aware, was Sarah who did.
Obviously retaliating to Craigs way with words was a necessity instead of speaking to Sarah directly.
Thats not aimed at one person, just generally speaking
Because when Craig was officially league staff, he had the power to do things he didnt have when he was unofficial.
I actually approached Sarah about Craigs attitude towards me and she never replied or spoke to him about it.
20:11 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
I agree, our offline chat is a mess
My phone makes me seem a bit of an eejit when in posting lol :( I hate iPhones :-)
I agree, our offline chat is a mess
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:12 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Can debate the wrongs and rights all you like but everybody argues their own opinions on subjects, a lot of the time I was arguing with craig against other people on league matters...can't see the difference in what people did here when he was in charge to what he has done himself a thousand times and what certain people are doing now.
Actually there is one difference, we are taking people's points out and answering them.
Actually there is one difference, we are taking people's points out and answering them.
20:13 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
just go to Egypt, your phone has time to melt
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:13 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
I was a league runner at the same time as Craig and once or twice I suggested to Sarah that craig stay as a background runner due to the problems that would arise but it unfortuneately got ignored I think this would of saved Sarah on the site.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:15 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Right, so killer defaults...
... im just wondering how its going to be judged...
...can i suggest 1 point for every person you can prove was online at the arranged time/deadline time (looking at forum posts etc) then no clan can get above 3 points for an unplayed game. Probably a stupid idea but an idea nontheless ahah!
... im just wondering how its going to be judged...
...can i suggest 1 point for every person you can prove was online at the arranged time/deadline time (looking at forum posts etc) then no clan can get above 3 points for an unplayed game. Probably a stupid idea but an idea nontheless ahah!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:16 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Im not defending anyone, personally i think its disgusting on everyones behalf who was involved
All the shooters players are coming out on the defense
Im not defending anyone, personally i think its disgusting on everyones behalf who was involved
20:16 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
agree with that, when craig did the tables only i had no problems it was only when he came in a position of power where i had doubts.
if im being honest i nearly quit the FBL several times when craig was a runner, something i wouldn't be able to do under Sarah as she ran the league well.
on another subject, should FBL have some sort of individual league or is the Players Championship and FCL enough?
if im being honest i nearly quit the FBL several times when craig was a runner, something i wouldn't be able to do under Sarah as she ran the league well.
on another subject, should FBL have some sort of individual league or is the Players Championship and FCL enough?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:17 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Kinda odd. Erm no that was never the problem with Craig. When he started handing out bans and speaking to members like they were pieces of dirt. THAT was the problem.
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
Also Craig never handed out bans as far as im aware, was Sarah who did.
Obviously retaliating to Craigs way with words was a necessity instead of speaking to Sarah directly.
Thats not aimed at one person, just generally speaking
Your right he has always done that, hence the reason why i say that he was never suitable to be a league runner. He's always been very arrogant and has no idea how to actually talk to people.
spoke to Sarah directly and it was evident nothing was going to change. Your literally just reiterating facts that have already been brought up. Craig never handed out the bans but it's odd how the people who question Craig, get banned dont you think?
Who was banned after questioning Craig? I dont often look on forums so im unaware on this
So Craig being part of league staff isnt the problem, but him actually openly admitting he is league staff and actually speaking is the problem.
Ok its all clear now, just wondered what the problem is, but now thats been cleared up its ok
Ok its all clear now, just wondered what the problem is, but now thats been cleared up its ok
Kinda odd. Erm no that was never the problem with Craig. When he started handing out bans and speaking to members like they were pieces of dirt. THAT was the problem.
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
Also Craig never handed out bans as far as im aware, was Sarah who did.
Obviously retaliating to Craigs way with words was a necessity instead of speaking to Sarah directly.
Thats not aimed at one person, just generally speaking
Your right he has always done that, hence the reason why i say that he was never suitable to be a league runner. He's always been very arrogant and has no idea how to actually talk to people.
spoke to Sarah directly and it was evident nothing was going to change. Your literally just reiterating facts that have already been brought up. Craig never handed out the bans but it's odd how the people who question Craig, get banned dont you think?
Who was banned after questioning Craig? I dont often look on forums so im unaware on this
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:18 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
I think what's there is enough especially for this season lol.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:18 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Oh god James not more leagues to sort out lmao!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:19 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Kinda odd. Erm no that was never the problem with Craig. When he started handing out bans and speaking to members like they were pieces of dirt. THAT was the problem.
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
Also Craig never handed out bans as far as im aware, was Sarah who did.
Obviously retaliating to Craigs way with words was a necessity instead of speaking to Sarah directly.
Thats not aimed at one person, just generally speaking
Your right he has always done that, hence the reason why i say that he was never suitable to be a league runner. He's always been very arrogant and has no idea how to actually talk to people.
spoke to Sarah directly and it was evident nothing was going to change. Your literally just reiterating facts that have already been brought up. Craig never handed out the bans but it's odd how the people who question Craig, get banned dont you think?
Who was banned after questioning Craig? I dont often look on forums so im unaware on this
horse10000/therev
So Craig being part of league staff isnt the problem, but him actually openly admitting he is league staff and actually speaking is the problem.
Ok its all clear now, just wondered what the problem is, but now thats been cleared up its ok
Ok its all clear now, just wondered what the problem is, but now thats been cleared up its ok
Kinda odd. Erm no that was never the problem with Craig. When he started handing out bans and speaking to members like they were pieces of dirt. THAT was the problem.
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
Also Craig never handed out bans as far as im aware, was Sarah who did.
Obviously retaliating to Craigs way with words was a necessity instead of speaking to Sarah directly.
Thats not aimed at one person, just generally speaking
Your right he has always done that, hence the reason why i say that he was never suitable to be a league runner. He's always been very arrogant and has no idea how to actually talk to people.
spoke to Sarah directly and it was evident nothing was going to change. Your literally just reiterating facts that have already been brought up. Craig never handed out the bans but it's odd how the people who question Craig, get banned dont you think?
Who was banned after questioning Craig? I dont often look on forums so im unaware on this
horse10000/therev
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:19 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
for me thats reason why i didn't trust him as a runner as he used to argue with quite a lot of members on the site.
Thats fair enough, but surely instead of retaliating back isnt the way to go about things, nothing gets sorted if all people will do is argue.
Maybe ignoring/walking away and talkin to head league runner would have been the best thing
From what Ive heard, Craig always done that, why is this time any different?
for me thats reason why i didn't trust him as a runner as he used to argue with quite a lot of members on the site.
Thats fair enough, but surely instead of retaliating back isnt the way to go about things, nothing gets sorted if all people will do is argue.
Maybe ignoring/walking away and talkin to head league runner would have been the best thing
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:19 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
Wouldn't tell people to stop discussing this from a league point of view as that isn't the way we do things and it is a valid topic but it's one of those times where openly discussing other members on forums and giving opinions on them or the situation is going to end up breaking site rules and site rules always take precedent.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:21 Tue 5 Jun 12 (BST) [Link]
horse10000/therev
Sarah banned therev, and as far as I was aware horse10000 only got a warning (not 100% on horse10000 but I am 100% on therev)
horse10000/therev
Sarah banned therev, and as far as I was aware horse10000 only got a warning (not 100% on horse10000 but I am 100% on therev)
| Unable to post | |
|---|---|
| Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
FBL discussion
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Funky Billiards League.
Back to Forum List.