League Discussion Thread...

Viewing forum thread.
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.

Pages: 16869
70
7172100
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
02:45 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
sorry you dont like it but i think my idea works better than what we have now... even dgen's idea was similar to mine.

ab... you complain about the snooker squads default results but arent opening your mind to new ideas... under my idea snooker squad would have received no points through defaults an advantage to all other clans but advantage to them would be not losing any for at least trying to get it played.... its like you want it both ways?
dgeneratio
dgeneratio
Posts: 38,097
02:46 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
maybe do with chris suggested a few seasons ago, have a default for individual people so not like a 7-7 score etc but say if you had that scenario (i think chris (cp) said) then it would be +15 for player A for being extremely active (unless of course no messages was sent then could be touch lower) and -15 for Player B for not logging on once.

you have a scale -15 to 15 do each person individually to see how much they have done to get the game played.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
02:47 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
Under the rules at the moment they should have scored about half the points they did get which actually would be a fairer reflection. By their own admission they had 2 or 3 'truly inactive' players who were scoring 7 or 8 points each.

As did we (the Underdogs) I might add.
horse10000
horse10000
Moderator
Posts: 9,926
02:50 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
chris said:
No reason why Player A should necessarily get 15 points - depends what they have done throughout the 2 weeks in highlighting the issue amongst other things. If they have done everything possible then 15 points - failing that then anywhere in between. Trouble is the way its done at the moment I believe 15 points would always have been given, which is wrong.

Work on other options to get games played during a period - such as what ab has suggested - or anything else. But if it all fails and a game doesnt get played then it has to come down to a genuine default score. Avoiding that just does not work full stop.


Exactly if player A has missed a couple of days, doesn't have a list of messages chasing for the game to get done, hasn't posted asking for a sub then depending on how much of this he has his points could be anything.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
02:51 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
If people can't play games within 2 weeks, and they message eachother, and try and get in contact, then captains should use subs more.... And get a stronger squad, even if it's Tom, Richard or Harry.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
02:52 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
(It wouldn't let me say the nickname for Richard.....)
ab_rfc
ab_rfc
Moderator
Posts: 7,940
02:52 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
diamond_jem said:
sorry you dont like it but i think my idea works better than what we have now... even dgen's idea was similar to mine.

ab... you complain about the snooker squads default results but arent opening your mind to new ideas... under my idea snooker squad would have received no points through defaults an advantage to all other clans but advantage to them would be not losing any for at least trying to get it played.... its like you want it both ways?

I'm sorry but if you honestly believe all that you've got me worried for the FCL.
Read what people are posting, your idea won't work and its not just me saying it,
horse10000
horse10000
Moderator
Posts: 9,926
02:52 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
diamond_jem said:
sorry you dont like it but i think my idea works better than what we have now... even dgen's idea was similar to mine.

ab... you complain about the snooker squads default results but arent opening your mind to new ideas... under my idea snooker squad would have received no points through defaults an advantage to all other clans but advantage to them would be not losing any for at least trying to get it played.... its like you want it both ways?


Snooker squad deserved points for the fixtures that weren't played. The point as chris has stated that as their players were inactive and even SS admit this. The default should have applied possibly a 4-4 instead of a 7-7 etc.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
02:52 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
but then you are still rewarding points for unplayed frames whether one person was online or not, i dont think this is fair especially if the league can be won on a default decision....

....least my way you only win on the points you have earnt!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
02:53 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
chris said:
Under the rules at the moment they should have scored about half the points they did get which actually would be a fairer reflection. By their own admission they had 2 or 3 'truly inactive' players who were scoring 7 or 8 points each.

As did we (the Underdogs) I might add.


Totally inactive players. 0 - 0 not 7 - 7
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
02:54 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
diamond_jem said:
but then you are still rewarding points for unplayed frames whether one person was online or not, i dont think this is fair especially if the league can be won on a default decision....

....least my way you only win on the points you have earnt!


You have earnt it, you've done everything in YOUR power, to get the game completed! Including working around you opponents times he's online.
horse10000
horse10000
Moderator
Posts: 9,926
02:55 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
ab_rfc said:
diamond_jem said:
sorry you dont like it but i think my idea works better than what we have now... even dgen's idea was similar to mine.

ab... you complain about the snooker squads default results but arent opening your mind to new ideas... under my idea snooker squad would have received no points through defaults an advantage to all other clans but advantage to them would be not losing any for at least trying to get it played.... its like you want it both ways?

I'm sorry but if you honestly believe all that you've got me worried for the FCL.
Read what people are posting, your idea won't work and its not just me saying it,


From what i can see it is mainly the players who have been around for all/most the seasons are saying that we need defaults. From experience of playing in the season for as long as i have without defaults this league will not exist.

I am sure others who have been over the learning curve of many seasons would agree with this.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
02:55 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
cphaynes said:

Totally inactive players. 0 - 0 not 7 - 7


Do you mean as per the actual rules at present?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
02:55 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
if the frames are not physically played, then you shouldnt be awarded the points
horse10000
horse10000
Moderator
Posts: 9,926
02:56 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
diamond_jem said:
but then you are still rewarding points for unplayed frames whether one person was online or not, i dont think this is fair especially if the league can be won on a default decision....

....least my way you only win on the points you have earnt!


You could also not win the league as a player chooses not to play you as his team is winning by a point with one game to play. Why would he play the last game he wouldn't.
dgeneratio
dgeneratio
Posts: 38,097
02:57 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
arguments won't stop imo, even without the league it would continue as some users are so alike (like my brother and sister) and when they collide you know about it its hard to ignore them unless you don't look at those threads but since arguments is a non stopper.

about what Jay posted about 1 member of defaults team could work, also what was posted, see what effort a clan has made to get the game played, make sure clans are aware to send in information by the deadline (had this problem a lot this season and a few defaults has been affected by it), and rate the individuals in the default separate rather than together.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
02:58 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
chris said:
cphaynes said:

Totally inactive players. 0 - 0 not 7 - 7


Do you mean as per the actual rules at present?



I mean, re-write the rules.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
02:59 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
because keith, refusal to play results in a point deduction
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
03:00 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
^^

And so it should! but thats not the opponents fault for not getting the game played.
horse10000
horse10000
Moderator
Posts: 9,926
03:01 Tue 17 Jan 12 (GMT)  [Link]  
chris said:
cphaynes said:

Totally inactive players. 0 - 0 not 7 - 7


Do you mean as per the actual rules at present?


Lol yes as per the actual rules which do not get applied.

0-0 (No effort and no activity by both) 2-2 (very small amount of effort, activity by both) 4-4 (A few messages back and forth and a reasonable activity by both) 7-7 (Lots of messages, posts, activity by both but game wasn't played)


A few examples of how to apply logic to defaults.
Pages: 16869
70
7172100
Unable to post
Reason:You must log in before you can post

League Discussion Thread...

Back to Top of this Page
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.