your problem is your too quick to think everyone is blaming you and don't read properly what it says i said it was my fault but mostly yours and yes the arguments did cause this.

the minute you closed down the site i lost respect for you and a friend in the process.

so good luck to what you do in future.

well i been deleted of fcl.

well i sorry anyway james shaun is a friend who i asked to help and he now has everything you might need to talk him through bits but he be on fcl forum once a day or so for anything you need but you and kev own the site now as he is just a host as is only there for tech surport.

so it you and kev gl.

me in future nothing i doing nothing

i am staying on the site and as a viper if that ok with everyone else,

i have nothing to do with league now as i think that was the prob i like to keep everyone happy and running league you cant so if i ok i would like to stay on site but only as a player and captain.

if not ok i understand soley.

If the sites staying up then great but to get the common sense side into defaults as was suggested how about a mediator?
*example with 3 days left till deadline they get a list of games left to be played and communicate with the captains and players to firstly help get them played and secondly be an impartial to judge which clans and players are making the effort.
We're only getting 1 in 40 games going to default a fortnight everyone wants to play them a mediator should get rid of the odd one and have no defaults.
Could also have a 10 point penalty if a team gets 2 negative defaults against them, extra incentive or the captains to not just let it go to default.

what about all the days before those 3 days, but yeh, someone who makes them get played could be useful, but that should be the captains job! like the bit in bold though, great idea

double, up the 8's....

i dont like the fbl too much to be fair

Thinking behind stepping in with 3 days till deadline was the mediator would only get a list of 10 games to check up on instead of 40 but if someone was having major trouble with an opponent not responding or showing when arranged could step in then too.

It is captains responsibility but if a mediator came to the captain and said 'look 3 days to go your players been offline for 5 days got to get the sub done now to be fair to the other team'
think it would help because obviously captains are going to want to hang on and wait for their better player to come on.

Don't get me wrong i don't mind the league myself but its too much eh. It's been nicely ran though and was a decent thing to play in.

double

Edited at 12:40 Fri 29/04/11 (BST)

yeah reminds me of snooker but a shorter version

What is the stance on timings for games?

I played a player the other day who chopped and changed between 20 and 25 seconds depending on what game we were playing =/

20 seconds i think the stance was, unless a different time is mutually agreed

i think you need two leagues or players only going to get 1 game a fortnight. or u put 3 matches up at a time for fcl.

20 seconds is the rule on pool, on snooker its between 20 and 40 seconds but if both of you agree then fair enough.

So if another player just made it 25 secs... that shouldnt have happend?

no not unless you agreed to it beforehand.

lol like it really matters was only an extra 5 seconds :-/

if frame was played then it stands though but should agree beforehand in future.