not if there are no 800plus games available

yes that is a nice idea but it would take some time for nick to add that.

for the time being would you sick with 60 seconds?
nick as got the code ready and would like to add it if everyone agrees.

Yes i agree as ppl set up a room for 500 to 800 and there like 761 for instance and i go in and they dont want to play cause im too low well set up a room for ur specifications lazy ppl.
That way they have to play if they dont leave b4 and i will get more games.

Thats my rant over for the day lol

Edited at 17:03 Tue 15/07/08 (BST)

You can only set the room to certain levels though and most people agree that would work a lot better if you could set your own parameters!

Like i wanna play 825-950 or i wanna play 550-700 etc. Then this wouldnt be so much of a problem

i agree with mike, wouldn't be such a problem then..









just for mike that is...

That doesnt bother me.......i was just posting what people have complained about in chat

no im with madmike on this one its a bad idea

1 ~ if they find it so annoying getting a game they should just create one of their own , there is always plenty waiting to play , plus sometimes you just want to practice and chat to a mate and not play but also dont want to be subjected to all the morans that clogg up the chat rooms of late

2 ~ i'm sure i'm not the only one , but i would not want to be in affect forced to play someone i know i could not stand to be in the same room as , its my game room why should i leave

3 ~ i create a game with the ranking range set at 700 to 900 because im about 750 in them all but i know im not capable of beating a 800 player , this would be annoying for the person who owns the room feeling they have to play knowing they will most likely lose

Mike that is unfair your telling your friends to post! i like to play dirty
this thread will have over 6000 posts by morning the way its going

Edited at 17:17 Tue 15/07/08 (BST)

Its not you vs me bud this is about a timer. Jo gave me her opinion in chat and i told her to post her views so theyd be heard. Ill do the same with anyone else who tells me their views but doesnt post them


lmao @ you offering lollipops and points in the chatroom to people to just post yes on this thread......how many so far.....none! pmsl

i agree

i told him about this and he agreed it should be added

lmao you keep getting people to post yes when they have no idea what they are doing, get your own way and reduce site traffic if you like

lmao morons that clogg up the chat rooms spring to mind lol x x

Im think there should be a boot limit

basically after 30 seconds of not clicking the rack they get booted into a chatroom probably already been suggested but its better than losing ranking points in games.

I feel it should be added - but if some people aren't happy it could be added as an option to the person creating the game.

Thats is still the best midway point we have had

Oh well i guess ill stop it shouldn't be added if it will reduce the site traffic... But how do you know?

I agree, it should be a kick from room or it should be a player option

Well, i've long supported this idea, and 20 seconds is more than enough time for anyone to decide whether their opponents fit whatever criteria they have chosen for that day/week/month.

Remember, this is an improvement to keep the game moving by preventing non-players from lingering in rooms, and therefore making the game more user friendly and fun.

A longer time limit would simply make people more likely to be caught out by thinking they have time to do something else.

This is all backed up by a simple fact - there is no reason whatsomever to be in a game room unless you want to play.

Absolutely agree with spinner, this needs to be brought in it will benefit the game an awful lot.

Yes!! keep them comming!