omg increase the max number of players to 15 for the crackkkkkkkkkkkkk

pmsl nial

Lmao.

This game is so fun!!! 5 seconds would just increase the fun factor, if that's possible Undoubtedly the best site on the internet now.

Edited at 20:43 Mon 23/06/08 (BST)

Not a bad idea if the game type's popular

Maybe in larger games the lives can be reduced.

That's EXACTLY what we were discussing in our last 10 man game

Tournament play, if that ever came around, could consist of infinite numbers of players with less lives, it seems the general consensus that increased number of players would only make the game more popular and more fun!

Shame you couldn't get an extra life if you pot more than one ball in a shot.
That would be good

I like that idea of tournament with infinite players

And Nicknax - that would be a nice little touch

http://www.funkypool.com/viewTopic.do?topicid=13363

thoughts?

One important change that is needed Nick:

If the same players stay in a room and play many games in a row, it seems like the playing order is indeed the same every time and not drawn again for each game.

I might obviously be mistaken, but it looked very much like that tonight. We had a game of four, where 3 players were constant in the room, the fourth changing now and then. The three of us had the exact same playing order all night, with the fourth player at the same slot every time as well.

Since playing order is so important in this game, it needs to be random for every new game that is started.

AM DICTED TO IT!

Look @ my Score tho


Keep it at three lives for the 'not so good aimers like moi'


Really fun game this, luv it


~Paula~

Sums it up nicely

I'm a bit grumpy at Nick for stealing all my time on this site lol - 5 hours straight today - that's how addictive that stupid game is

LMAO Jan!

I get excited when i pot and others miss *claps*

Ok am crap but so what? I have fun!

Oh am going for a game!! LOL


Did i thankyou Nick?

Thanks! Might sing Creep for ya again sometime!!

~Paula~

How about... a table that kicks off after 10 minutes or after a minimum of players are present? Then when it's finished and someone wins, it kicks off again with a new time limit of 10 mins to join, etc etc? In other words a multi-player event with no regular time.

Example: it kicks off with, maybe, an annoucement. Players have 10 mins to get their keesters into the room. (Or even three...?) Once the time's up, the game kicks off with whoever's there. Once there's a winner, a new 10 min opportunity to join begins and it starts all over again. Thoughts?

There should be an announcement for whoever wins 100 points plus.

Thoughts?

gd idea mr_mc!! should be done

The only score less than 110 is 99, so maybe announcements for both of them?

Nick: How about when a spectator joins and they can't see the action as usual, that they can see what happens from the next re-rack in the same game?

Personally, I think if there was to be a tournament type for the game, it should simply be 'last man standing', where by players all have the allocated number of lives, and the last one gets a tourny win.

Maybe have it is a few game rooms rather than one, and as soon as there are a certain number of players in each room, a new invite is issued respectively. (just so there are never toooo many in each room you have to wait ages for a shot).


edit: I know it's similar to the quoted text, just wanted to elaborate on the number of rooms thing

Edited at 00:45 Tue 24/06/08 (BST)

Alternating player order will be added. 3 balls to hit the cushion off the break (idea in other thread) would be good too, I'll look into it.

Unfortunately watch game cannot work at any time but entire game start. However I'm looking at changing this across the whole site as opposed to a solution for just killer.

Good stuff Nick