New Game Times
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
03:53 Thu 8 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
Couldn't of said it better myself. I like to think it an acheivement that i've won 30 tournies (not that i'm bragging.......honest) With one every half hour it will be too much!
raizen said:
I've always though 1 an hour was sort of a lot already.
Every half hour would be 48 tournaments a day. A tournament win wont even mean anything anymore.
sounds like inflation. lol
Every half hour would be 48 tournaments a day. A tournament win wont even mean anything anymore.
sounds like inflation. lol
Couldn't of said it better myself. I like to think it an acheivement that i've won 30 tournies (not that i'm bragging.......honest) With one every half hour it will be too much!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:34 Thu 8 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
i dont know theres thousands of ppl with a lot of tourny wins and its just another one so wouldnt make it more challenging on getting the most wins with a lot more competion.
08:09 Fri 9 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
No, because the person with the most wins could then simply be whoever manages to get online the most. You seem to be calling for 'tourny wins for all'. How does that make a tourny win any sort of achievement at all?
What next? Do we start setting our own rankings so that we can all be equal?
cards6363 said:
i dont know theres thousands of ppl with a lot of tourny wins and its just another one so wouldnt make it more challenging on getting the most wins with a lot more competion.
No, because the person with the most wins could then simply be whoever manages to get online the most. You seem to be calling for 'tourny wins for all'. How does that make a tourny win any sort of achievement at all?
What next? Do we start setting our own rankings so that we can all be equal?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
08:11 Fri 9 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
(SSShhhhhhhhhhhh, martin really hates tony blair and his pc brigade, so don't mention it to him, or he get's angry!)
Agree with ya martin!
Agree with ya martin!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:32 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
i think this is a great idea because it would give ppl that suck like me a chance to win some games
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:36 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
Try reading what we put m8! And remember it's not the winning, it's the taking part that counts!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:37 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
No, because the person with the most wins could then simply be whoever manages to get online the most. You seem to be calling for 'tourny wins for all'. How does that make a tourny win any sort of achievement at all?
What next? Do we start setting our own rankings so that we can all be equal?
Yeah a lot of ppl will get tourny wins but that dont mean that newbies will control the tournys. More advance ppl will control them still, but it allows ppl who get put out early in tournys like the first or second round. By doing this ppl wouldn't have to wait a long period of time on a new tourny. I know that it sucks losing in the first round and having to wait an hour or close to an hour to play another.
martin_blank said:
cards6363 said:
i dont know theres thousands of ppl with a lot of tourny wins and its just another one so wouldnt make it more challenging on getting the most wins with a lot more competion.
No, because the person with the most wins could then simply be whoever manages to get online the most. You seem to be calling for 'tourny wins for all'. How does that make a tourny win any sort of achievement at all?
What next? Do we start setting our own rankings so that we can all be equal?
Yeah a lot of ppl will get tourny wins but that dont mean that newbies will control the tournys. More advance ppl will control them still, but it allows ppl who get put out early in tournys like the first or second round. By doing this ppl wouldn't have to wait a long period of time on a new tourny. I know that it sucks losing in the first round and having to wait an hour or close to an hour to play another.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:41 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
Get better then m8! Simple, harsh i know but tough luck. The fact of the matter is, this would devalue a tourny win, may as well habe them out like lolipops.
EDIT: When i first started this game i couldn't get past the first round, but then a good freind took me under his wing anf tuaght me how to play, *wipes tear away from eye*, now he's one of the greats. But you get my point, it will come!
Edited at 08:43 Sat 10/02/07 (GMT)
EDIT: When i first started this game i couldn't get past the first round, but then a good freind took me under his wing anf tuaght me how to play, *wipes tear away from eye*, now he's one of the greats. But you get my point, it will come!
Edited at 08:43 Sat 10/02/07 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:42 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
lmao dude dont u have better things to do then sit and read my friends forms
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:43 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
I think you mean to say "hand them out like lollypops." The thing is who gets the most tourny wins. Yeah its nice now to get tourny wins but it will move it to another lvl on who gets the most tourny wins.
1_eye said:
Get better then m8! Simple, harsh i know but tough luck. The fact of the matter is, this would devalue a tourny win, may as well habe them out like lolipops.
I think you mean to say "hand them out like lollypops." The thing is who gets the most tourny wins. Yeah its nice now to get tourny wins but it will move it to another lvl on who gets the most tourny wins.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:44 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
ERrrrrrrr, no! And it's than not then! And your friends forum?
80cook80 said:
lmao dude dont u have better things to do then sit and read my friends forms
ERrrrrrrr, no! And it's than not then! And your friends forum?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:45 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
Before you start talking about ppls typing you may need to check out your owns.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:48 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
I stand corrected!
Eiter way i think this would be a bad idea!
(and i'm not the only one)
Eiter way i think this would be a bad idea!
(and i'm not the only one)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:50 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
Yeah I understand but I would like to be able to have a vote on here and let it decide. Really it dont matter because nick is the one who decides on everything. But I think a vote would be nice. What do you think eye.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:52 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
You can have your vote m8! But i have the feeling nick won't bother with this, but we run a democracy here so feel free to ask everyone to post yes or no!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:55 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
Yes or No but what i would really like is Nicks opion.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:58 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
Unfortunatley, nick is a very busy man, he has 2 sites to look after among other things. Martin_blank or pool_life's opinion should do though as they are nicks right and left hand men!
Edited at 09:01 Sat 10/02/07 (GMT)
Edited at 09:01 Sat 10/02/07 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:59 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
Well didn't know that but thier opion would work as good.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
22:59 Sat 10 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
Right now, there are people who get DQ'd or don't play in tournaments because they are still in an earlier tournament that's going on. If there are more tournaments, it would spread out the good players even more.
If they add more tournaments, there would be 4 or more tournaments over lapping all the time.
I suppose you(Cards6363 and 80cook80) are for having more tournaments because you are having trouble winning them? I guess that means your strategy of PMing people over and over during your games isn't working out for you two? Or have you given that up?
Edited at 05:00 Sun 11/02/07 (GMT)
If they add more tournaments, there would be 4 or more tournaments over lapping all the time.
I suppose you(Cards6363 and 80cook80) are for having more tournaments because you are having trouble winning them? I guess that means your strategy of PMing people over and over during your games isn't working out for you two? Or have you given that up?
Edited at 05:00 Sun 11/02/07 (GMT)
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
New Game Times
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.