Reverse time holders
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Fun and Games.
Back to Forum List.
11:43 Fri 23 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
20 hrs and 2 mins... I do believe I'm BACK IN THE LEAD?!?!?!?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
11:43 Fri 23 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
Oh my. We must put a stop to that right away!
12:20 Fri 23 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
I dunno... but thank you all! Who was in the lead again? Claire or Paula? Why didn't you post? Much appreciated though!
Edited at 18:20 Fri 23/02/07 (GMT)
Edited at 18:20 Fri 23/02/07 (GMT)
12:39 Fri 23 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
No, I'm in the lead, and I never want to let it go. It's my baby and I want to nurture and cherish it! And maybe breastfeed it when it gets hungry...
Looks like all the times I wrote <CAPPED> finally sunk in!!!!!
Looks like all the times I wrote <CAPPED> finally sunk in!!!!!
10:05 Sat 24 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
Yes, she did, nem. An excellent question.
Katie did post before me. Katie posted all of 25 minutes before me. And just before that, I had posted 20 hours and two minutes earlier. And THAT was the 20h2m I was referring to.
New rule/Old rule that I never bothered to write down: If the next post in this thread guarantees that the previous poster will take the lead, that poster can be considered to be in the lead regardless of whether or not another post actually follows it.
Explanation: If the lead is, say, 20 hours, and no-one posts for a whole day, and everyone decides "Oh, we don't want the person who posted last to be in the lead, let's abandon this thread" (or something similarly dastardly), then the person who last posted is in the lead anyway, because the next post after theirs will put them in the lead.
Questions? Thought not. Just a technicality anyway. Let's keep a-rockin' and a-rollin
nem05 said:
eh? didnt katie post just before yu
Yes, she did, nem. An excellent question.
Katie did post before me. Katie posted all of 25 minutes before me. And just before that, I had posted 20 hours and two minutes earlier. And THAT was the 20h2m I was referring to.
New rule/Old rule that I never bothered to write down: If the next post in this thread guarantees that the previous poster will take the lead, that poster can be considered to be in the lead regardless of whether or not another post actually follows it.
Explanation: If the lead is, say, 20 hours, and no-one posts for a whole day, and everyone decides "Oh, we don't want the person who posted last to be in the lead, let's abandon this thread" (or something similarly dastardly), then the person who last posted is in the lead anyway, because the next post after theirs will put them in the lead.
Questions? Thought not. Just a technicality anyway. Let's keep a-rockin' and a-rollin
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:06 Sat 24 Feb 07 (GMT) [Link]
i couldn't be bothered reading the new rule!
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Reverse time holders
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Fun and Games.
Back to Forum List.