20+ rank points is far too much, I'm pretty sure it can't happen but if some people are winning 50 points=ish a day when trying and 3 tourns in a row when trying then that will be 110 points. I could play for a week and retire. Think the initial idea of +4 and a tourny win was better. Although it isn't possible. Can't remember why, just remember being told for the past x years....

Cool this thread is alive!

ediss - Thanks for answering the question of "why". Well sorta! LOL!

Right. The idea of offering rankings according to how well you do in a tourney is stupid, and would definitely be awkward for Nick.

However, i can see no reason why tournament games shouldn't be ranked. Exactly the same as normal games.

Well?

It would be good if only the final is ranked and you get a set amount of rank for winnin it. Sayin how frequent tournies are now, it would be a waste if there was more than 2 ranked a week.

a think jst the marathon on saturday shud b ranked therfor loads more rounds nd ppl means more pointz if ya win

i didnt even know that touneys were ranked.... can someone explain plz?

Lmao spinner, I tried lol