Actually If you look at the context of a business agreement, It does actually make sense, (I don't belive it myself) But many do. There are many theories about many different things but you can't cancel them all out just because of what you think, You must keep and open mind.

Ans as for the 9 in a row, Rangers may not have beaten it, But they did equal it. I will be the first to admin that when I watch an old firm derby these days I can only think of how many goals the Gers will lose by. Rangers Will get back on top eventually...It's a vicious cycle. But I won't be until both teams are out of debt!

"Actually If you look at the context of a business agreement, It does actually make sense"


what the hell are you talking about?

I mean, If ranger and ceptic didnt have the firce rivalry that they have now, Would they be as popular as they are today? Would ceptic have 60k and rangers 49K fans packing out their respective stadiums every week? Probably not. Chances are they may be where hearts and Hibs are...20k sstadiums...A hell of a lot more in debt and not two of the most sucessful clubs in world footbaling history.

wtf fk r u on about u daf c.unt
celtic hav 60k cuz theyr a big club u nob!!!!!

true

smiley_jesus, you really dont know what you are talking about do you..............

nope he doesnt :-P

he cant even bloody spell
what the hell is ceptic and ranger
theres no hope for some people.....

ok i,m an everton and a rangers fan so you can,t call me a glory hunter for supporting two teams rangers are more supported and just on a bad role they,ll be back celtic are just stupid catholics with no sence knowing what there talking about in football just like liverpool cheers!

nathan

Edited at 20:42 Tue 20/12/05 (GMT)

you racist c**t

stupid catholics i hope u die u fkin english prik
ur maw luvs it up the hope ya fkin wnka
CELTIC ARE MEER SUPPORTED > FACT!! HENCE THE BIGGER CAPACITY EVERY WEEK
the cheek of yae yan orange cnt

Edited at 21:09 Tue 20/12/05 (GMT)

proddy bastid

and u can only support 1 team!!!!!!!!


F . T . Q

Edited at 21:10 Tue 20/12/05 (GMT)

ent it time 4 scousers tae b oot stealin motors the now?

And someone said I couln't spell. "ceptic" is not a spelling mistake. It was intetional. "ranger" was a genuine mistake. You can slag of Rangers all you like, Your just jealous the Gers have won more trophies.
This sectarianism has given The old firm a bad name, Its fine by me singing traditional songs in the stands but lets not sink to it on a forum. We are better then that, Well some of us.
And as for don't know what I'm taking about. you'd be suprised. There are several online sources both from Rangers and "ceptic" fansite that explain the business agreement theory better then I did. I suggest you go and do some research then come back when you are alittle more educated.

you do know that rangers havent got a non-secterianist song? and when they have a normal song they change the words to some racist or secteriast chant.

exactly... smiley_jesus what kind of a name is that

m8 you have serious mental health problems

sum rangers sectarianism examples:
"hullo hullo we r the bill boys...blah blah bah.. wer up 2 our knees in "FENIAN" blood surrender or ull die"

im not even going 2 say y rangers fans dae the 'bouncy'

i fcking h8 rangers scum

"Its fine by me singing traditional songs in the stands" That's a quote from my last post.

And the name smiley_jesus is a nickname given to me by the people of my hockey clube because I smile all of the time (some say religiously).

I can't see why you slag me off...and my football team...Its quite sad really.