I can post EVERY single message we made trying to get the match played ONLY to be met with constant IGNORANCE!

Accuse me of fabricating anything then PROVE IT! - I'll accuse you of being INCONSISTENT - proofs on all the threads this season and the last.

There's my PROOF!

lol prove that Keith is biased? Did you see the entire effort Joeyy and Ego made? probably not, unless your in the runner position and see the effort, you can't predict a default. You can guess by posts, effort and activity on the forum but thats only half of it.

Let me guess, hes biased as hes apart of Uprising, biased because hes not obsessed with winning a league title.

Expecting 15-0 to you default or something. Before accusing someone you need actual proof and the rules has changed since last season.

You could but joeyy is only half the fixture, you need egos effort as well as joeyys to predict

Totally agree mate - the inconsistency stinks!

We've played ball this season...now you'll see underhanded tactics - you brought it upon yourselves. Week 3 watch us do NAFF all...you get rewarded for it.

I couldn't give a crap what their player did or didn't my main concern is the effort and application myself, friendyboy, joeyy (actual player) did to try and get the match played.

Please keep your nose out too - horse c'mon justify your nonsense in your first post?

If you are going to post at least post actual facts as opposed to fabrication to try and justify your post.

Sorry Team - it's just a joke! - Here's the fixtures - keep doing what you can to get matches played - we wont sink that shallow and be as pathetic as others.

I've been nothing but accommodating this season I think - this just goes to prove it gets us nowhere.

From now on we'll make subs if and only they are fully warranted.

Edited at 19:52 Fri 05/02/16 (GMT)

Only if you stop calling the league runner biased, i know from experience how it feels, Keith is one of the fairest runners i have been with over the years (chris too) so going to defend him.

FBL Fix Set 1:
Deadline: 07/02/2016

Phoenix Revenge A

Phoenix Revenge A (6) Vs (2) Uprising Originals


Phoenix Revenge A (5) Vs (3) FPD's A


Phoenix Revenge A (6) Vs (0) Dragon Flame A
8us: (swp) (s) apples_back (2) vs (0) asdfghjk (6-2)
9us: _knightmare_ (2) vs (0) poolbiird (5-3)
8uk: (swp) rewill vs northman
Str: rapid_pot (2) vs (0) cortez

Phoenix Revenge A (5) Vs (3) Black Scorpions A


Phoenix Revenge A (3) Vs (1) Phoenix Revenge B
8us: rewill vs tinie_v17
9us: apples_back (2) vs (0) _gerardddd_ (7-1)
8uk: _fresh_ vs hunter
Str: rapid_pot (1) vs (1) legend_pot

FBL....Continued

Phoenix Revenge B (4) Vs (4) FPD's B


Phoenix Revenge B (5) Vs (3) Dragon Flame B


Phoenix Revenge B (6 Vs (2) Pocket Dynamos B


Phoenix Revenge B (4) Vs (0) Black Scorpions B
8us: joeyy (2) vs (0) askingfan (5-1)
9us: (swp) tinie_v17 (2) vs (0) sinkemall (5-2)
8uk: (s) _gerardddd_ vs callaway40 (s)
Str: (swp) legend_pot vs scallo (s)

SL Fixture Set 1
Deadline: 14th February 2016

Phoenix Revenge A

Phoenix Revenge A (15) Vs (10) FPD A


Phoenix Revenge A (10) Vs (8) Uprising Originals
_fresh_ (3) vs (3) corsair
2pac786 (3) vs (3) miss_harriet
apples_back (4) vs (2) w_hoolahan
(s) rapid_pot vs clifton188

Phoenix Revenge A (8) Vs (4) Dragon Flame A
_knightmare_ vs red4eva (s) (Sun 07/02 Evening)
rewill vs northman
apples_back (5) vs (1) poolbiird
(s) rapid_pot (3) vs (3) asdfghjk

Phoenix Revenge A (8) Vs (4) Pocket Dynamos A
2pac786 vs _siber_man_
_fresh_ (4) vs (2) _takeiteasy_
jamesmcgarry (apples_back) vs the__priest
rewill (4) vs (2) davyb0207

Phoenix Revenge A (10) Vs (3) Phoenix Revenge B
apples_back vs legend_pot
_fresh_ (4) vs (3) joeyy
rapid_pot vs tinie_v17
2pac786 (6) vs (0) friendyboy

SL...Continued

Phoenix Revenge B

Phoenix Revenge B (5) Vs (1) Uprising Strawberries
tinie_v17 vs dv8
joeyy (5) vs (1) horse10000
legend_pot vs zantetsukenz
(s) hunter vs erigert (s)

Phoenix Revenge B (12) Vs (8) Dragon Flame B
tinie_v17 (6) vs (1) __start__
legend_pot vs dvz
hunter (4) vs (3) dgeneratio
joeyy (2) vs (4) i_am_noob

Phoenix Revenge B (2) Vs (4) Pocket Dynamos B
friendyboy vs walktall
hunter (2) vs (4) punkpoet
(s) _gerardddd_ vs james_h
legend_pot vs jasonb

Phoenix Revenge B (8) Vs (4) Black Scorpions B
_gerardddd_ (3) vs (3) scallo
joeyy (5) vs (1) sinkemall
hunter vs callaway40
friendyboy vs _flukez_

Phoenix Revenge A vs Phoenix Revenge B (Same as post above)

FCL Fix Set 2: 31/01/2016 >>> 21/02/2016

Phoenix Revenge (3) Vs (12) Uprising

legend_pot vs cgibson92
_fresh_ vs w_hoolahan
apples_back vs corsair (swp)
2pac786 vs miss_harriet
joeyy vs clifton188
rapid_pot vs r1p0m4n_v2
tinie_v17 (3) vs (12) dark_chocco
(s) rewill vs dv8 (swp)

Phoenix Revenge (35) Vs (25) Dragon Flame

apples_back (9) vs (6) i_am_noob
hunter vs __start__
(s) tinie_v17 (7) vs (8) dvz
friendyboy vs allypunk
(s) joeyy vs dgeneratio
rewill (9) vs (6) re_rack_jack
_fresh_ (10) vs (5) lateo1993
legend_pot vs northman

Phoenix Revenge (52) Vs (23) FPD's

rapid_pot vs ferretlady
_gerardddd_ (13) vs (2) blackcabman7
joeyy (13) vs (2) _psmon_
tinie_v17 (7) vs (8) count_raven
hunter (8) vs (7) watchinawe
2pac786 vs _magic_
apples_back (11) vs (4) fr34k_p0t
rewill vs im_crap_adam


* I'll refrain from member tags for the time being - Week 2 they will be added as a gentle reminder.

with all due respect here Ash

I got messed about, by none active players
I could've easily sat back
and looked for the default
I didn't I played, you didn't even make a comment
about me making any effort to play

all I got was you giving me grief for whining

now id say put in active players from the beginning and if you need to swap or sub when your better players come online

you will probably give me grief, but surely its better to put active players in from the start, isn't it

Where have I called him biased?
Get your facts right before you involve yourself and your own ego.
Simples!
friendyboy said he was biased NOT me!

You can post whatever you want, but the only default information that was provided was by joeyy so all your other information you can post is useless as not included in the default.

I don't think you're actually understanding the Lesson you should have learned here Ashleigh.
1. You firstly used an inactive player and then avoided removing your player, hence activity around 15%. Default Score is reflective of that.

2. Your Co-Captain then accuses League Runners of bias . Not Applicable due to Point 1 But seriously, show a bit of bloody Respect!

3. At this point, you have now thrown the toys outta the pram and now threaten to avoid matches and use the default to YOUR advantage. To be perfectly honest, why don't you just invite anyone who fancies an argument, or, those you intend to aggravate an invitation to bring the Phoenix Thread ultimately to an end!!!.....I thought there was enough crap here last year to last the entirety of the future Clan Leagues!! Wasn't such fun back then for ANYONE

Take yer medicine, Suck it up, and, Try and win something The Proper Way

Edited at 20:04 Fri 05/02/16 (GMT)

I think thats a bit unfair mate, im pretty sure ash didnt anticipate andy being offline for so long and im pretty sure ash removed andy as soon as he could

This might come as a bit of a surprise to you...but I agree. My comments to you were unjustified and unreasonable and for that I apologised. I would have loved to have been able to sub our player out but the rules restricted me from doing so. Why should I remove a very good player when i were told he'd be around or active? Had I not known that of course our action would be to remove and hope he'd returned or became more active the following fixture set.

Moving on to fixtures set 2 now it's abundantly clear he wont be active not only has he been removed temporarily from the side but he's been omitted from any matches trying to accommodate our opponents and their fixtures.

My point is it was the first fixture set we had no idea or knowledge he'd be inactive for a duration 14 days - he's still inactive now.

Can that not be implemented for the rest of the season automatic subs for say more than 5-7 days??? no others allowed still.

Point 1, that does no good in a default. You can't complain the default score doesn't represent the match when you don't send info in. The score will reflect the info, if you don't do your job don't blame someone else.

Point 2, the fabrication would be you saying you made a sub at the earliest point when you yourself have said otherwise and you continue to dispute. The rules are there. Saying your proof is on all the threads isn't proving anything. It's just a poor attempt to lash out.

cheers Ash