Firestorm Phoenix: 'Ready To Set The Leagues Alight' :)
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Clan and League Chat.
Back to Forum List.
00:20 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
Plus, it's really irrelevant, the first two frames played, are the ones that count. You guy left the first frame, and the second, our guy won.
sorry harriet, its down to ryan, he replayed, ash can't decide to claim because his guy lost in the last frame AFTER ryan decided to replay.
i already said i would have claimed and i couldn't argue but the fact Ryan replayed means i can argue that a frame can't be claimed once the decision to replay is made.
i even told ryan to claim in future but he says the result wasn't fair so he replayed, i would have claimed but its down to the player in the match, not his captain, his opponents player, his opponents captain or anyone else, just the player who stayed logged in.
1-1 it is
i already said i would have claimed and i couldn't argue but the fact Ryan replayed means i can argue that a frame can't be claimed once the decision to replay is made.
i even told ryan to claim in future but he says the result wasn't fair so he replayed, i would have claimed but its down to the player in the match, not his captain, his opponents player, his opponents captain or anyone else, just the player who stayed logged in.
1-1 it is
Plus, it's really irrelevant, the first two frames played, are the ones that count. You guy left the first frame, and the second, our guy won.
00:26 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
your guy replayed so its 1-1. will even ask him next time he is on, if a frame is replayed the quitted frame is gone as if it never happened.
your clan is REALLY clutching at straws now, its poor that a clan has to go to this length to win a clan game, wish i could say take the win but i believe i am right.
if legend claimed or even won the last frame, i would be saying unlucky sean, legend is a good player and we kept it close but because he replayed and sean won the last then that is the reason for all this tonight.
legend_pot legend_pot
2 - 0 wouldn't have been a fair result mate, im happy with the draw either way
Sent about 2 hours ago
dgeneratio
Online
dgeneratio
yeah, i couldnt argue with 2-0 you but i have to argue about ash trying to claim a replayed frame as he wants to win so bad.
Sent about 2 hours ago
we really need a ruling from a league staff member here or at least cap pros and firestorm threads for the night as its backwards and forwards.
your clan is REALLY clutching at straws now, its poor that a clan has to go to this length to win a clan game, wish i could say take the win but i believe i am right.
if legend claimed or even won the last frame, i would be saying unlucky sean, legend is a good player and we kept it close but because he replayed and sean won the last then that is the reason for all this tonight.
legend_pot legend_pot
2 - 0 wouldn't have been a fair result mate, im happy with the draw either way
Sent about 2 hours ago
dgeneratio
Online
dgeneratio
yeah, i couldnt argue with 2-0 you but i have to argue about ash trying to claim a replayed frame as he wants to win so bad.
Sent about 2 hours ago
we really need a ruling from a league staff member here or at least cap pros and firestorm threads for the night as its backwards and forwards.
00:28 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
How do we know you didn't instruct him to leave the room at 33-0 behind?
How do we know and yourself for that matter that it wasn't a rage quit?
How do we know with him leaving the game when 0-33 that didn't affect Ryan to continue to run and win the frame in that 1 visit?
The simple answer is WE DON'T.
What is evident, plain and simple is we won the 1st frame regardless and out of good sportsmanship and fairness you and your player should acknowledge you're player was in the wrong therefore you lose the frame.
Accidents do happen but this decision is absolutely appalling and hardly sets a precedent for future Straight games. If you're losing, don't fret, just leave the room and you can replay it.
Sorry but whatever spiel you want to preach James I'm not interested - also I disagree with the League Runner having the overall decision as the result clearly benefits his current team so therefore removes all impartiality. Nothing about a bias just impartiality.
Just do the right thing and admit in all fairness we won 9-7 and legend_pot did what he needed to do and that is run 33 in frame 1 and won the 2nd frame - it's in black and white on his results page.
How do we know and yourself for that matter that it wasn't a rage quit?
How do we know with him leaving the game when 0-33 that didn't affect Ryan to continue to run and win the frame in that 1 visit?
The simple answer is WE DON'T.
What is evident, plain and simple is we won the 1st frame regardless and out of good sportsmanship and fairness you and your player should acknowledge you're player was in the wrong therefore you lose the frame.
Accidents do happen but this decision is absolutely appalling and hardly sets a precedent for future Straight games. If you're losing, don't fret, just leave the room and you can replay it.
Sorry but whatever spiel you want to preach James I'm not interested - also I disagree with the League Runner having the overall decision as the result clearly benefits his current team so therefore removes all impartiality. Nothing about a bias just impartiality.
Just do the right thing and admit in all fairness we won 9-7 and legend_pot did what he needed to do and that is run 33 in frame 1 and won the 2nd frame - it's in black and white on his results page.
00:30 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
Not sure why there is a discussion regarding this game, legend pot himself has clearly stated that he decided to replay the first frame, so the score is 1-1. The rule has always been down to the players involved.
FBL Game
legend_pot 1 - 1 sean_92
Played alright here but could have been better, we started the match and I got to a run of 33, before sean logged out (which wasn't his fault) and I played safe, I decided to replay the first which I won with a 21 along the way then sean won the second with a 20 odd run. I suppose I didn't miss a ball really just got unlucky with some cannons, I could of took the 2 - 0 for a great result but that wouldn't have been fair in my eyes, still happily take the draw against a great player ggs
legend_pot 1 - 1 sean_92
Played alright here but could have been better, we started the match and I got to a run of 33, before sean logged out (which wasn't his fault) and I played safe, I decided to replay the first which I won with a 21 along the way then sean won the second with a 20 odd run. I suppose I didn't miss a ball really just got unlucky with some cannons, I could of took the 2 - 0 for a great result but that wouldn't have been fair in my eyes, still happily take the draw against a great player ggs
Not sure why there is a discussion regarding this game, legend pot himself has clearly stated that he decided to replay the first frame, so the score is 1-1. The rule has always been down to the players involved.
00:30 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
No legend_pot replayed, you just want to win so badly and its really poor.
in my 8 years of clans this is a first for me which is saying something.
in my 8 years of clans this is a first for me which is saying something.
00:31 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
Thanks Keith, no more from me tonight, admin can revoke my rights for tonight if they wish
00:32 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
SL
Firestorm v Pocket Dynamos
8us 2-0
9us 2-0
8uk 1-1
overall
_fresh_ 5-1 punkpoet
nice games here, good player and a nice fella aswell.
i didnt manage a clearance in the first 8uk game when there was a chance, ended up snookering myself.
having said that in 1 or 2 he was ul with ball positioning and handed me a couple of chances which i took
ggs pal gl for the rest of the season
Firestorm v Pocket Dynamos
8us 2-0
9us 2-0
8uk 1-1
overall
_fresh_ 5-1 punkpoet
nice games here, good player and a nice fella aswell.
i didnt manage a clearance in the first 8uk game when there was a chance, ended up snookering myself.
having said that in 1 or 2 he was ul with ball positioning and handed me a couple of chances which i took
ggs pal gl for the rest of the season
00:32 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
I don't understand your logic..... It was 33-0. It wasn't 1-0, or 10<, it was 33...
your guy replayed so its 1-1. will even ask him next time he is on, if a frame is replayed the quitted frame is gone as if it never happened.
your clan is REALLY clutching at straws now, its poor that a clan has to go to this length to win a clan game, wish i could say take the win but i believe i am right.
if legend claimed or even won the last frame, i would be saying unlucky sean, legend is a good player and we kept it close but because he replayed and sean won the last then that is the reason for all this tonight.
legend_pot legend_pot
2 - 0 wouldn't have been a fair result mate, im happy with the draw either way
Sent about 2 hours ago
dgeneratio
Online
dgeneratio
yeah, i couldnt argue with 2-0 you but i have to argue about ash trying to claim a replayed frame as he wants to win so bad.
Sent about 2 hours ago
we really need a ruling from a league staff member here or at least cap pros and firestorm threads for the night as its backwards and forwards.
your clan is REALLY clutching at straws now, its poor that a clan has to go to this length to win a clan game, wish i could say take the win but i believe i am right.
if legend claimed or even won the last frame, i would be saying unlucky sean, legend is a good player and we kept it close but because he replayed and sean won the last then that is the reason for all this tonight.
legend_pot legend_pot
2 - 0 wouldn't have been a fair result mate, im happy with the draw either way
Sent about 2 hours ago
dgeneratio
Online
dgeneratio
yeah, i couldnt argue with 2-0 you but i have to argue about ash trying to claim a replayed frame as he wants to win so bad.
Sent about 2 hours ago
we really need a ruling from a league staff member here or at least cap pros and firestorm threads for the night as its backwards and forwards.
I don't understand your logic..... It was 33-0. It wasn't 1-0, or 10<, it was 33...
00:35 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
Very good result mate - very nice Well Played.
SL
Firestorm v Pocket Dynamos
8us 2-0
9us 2-0
8uk 1-1
overall
_fresh_ 5-1 punkpoet
nice games here, good player and a nice fella aswell.
i didnt manage a clearance in the first 8uk game when there was a chance, ended up snookering myself.
having said that in 1 or 2 he was ul with ball positioning and handed me a couple of chances which i took
ggs pal gl for the rest of the season
Firestorm v Pocket Dynamos
8us 2-0
9us 2-0
8uk 1-1
overall
_fresh_ 5-1 punkpoet
nice games here, good player and a nice fella aswell.
i didnt manage a clearance in the first 8uk game when there was a chance, ended up snookering myself.
having said that in 1 or 2 he was ul with ball positioning and handed me a couple of chances which i took
ggs pal gl for the rest of the season
Very good result mate - very nice Well Played.
00:43 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
FBL Fixture Set 1
Deadline: 20th September 2015.
Firestorm Phoenix (13) vs (3) F.P.D - Complete
Firestorm Phoenix (6) vs (8) Uprising
8us: (swp) (s) slimeball (1) vs (1) erigert (4-4)
8us: achpfsk (0) vs (2) dv8 (3-5)
9us: _payback_ (2) vs (0) _niall_ (5-2) (s)
9us: (swp) davybaumers (1) vs (1) nike (4-4)
8uk: _fresh_ (2) vs (0) r1p0m4n_v2 (6-2)
8uk: (swp) ghost_chili (0) vs (2) corsair (3-5)
Str: (swp) miss_harriet vs turtle1560
Str: joeyy (0) vs (2) clifton188
Firestorm Phoenix (8) vs (8) Pros - Complete (9-7)
Completed: 23/24
Deadline: 20th September 2015.
Firestorm Phoenix (13) vs (3) F.P.D - Complete
8us: (s) 2pac786 (1) vs (1) klien (4-4) (s)
8us: friendyboy (2) vs (0) _psmon_ (7-1)
9us: slimeball (2) vs (0) fasteddie_ (5-3)
9us: alex_lewis (2) vs (0) buckjam (s) (5-0)
8uk: _fresh_ (2) vs (0) anoneeemouse (5-2)
8uk: davybaumers (0) vs (2) scottyjr (3-5)
Str: legend_pot (2) vs (0) watchinawe
Str: miss_harriet (2) vs (0) _pot_luck_
8us: friendyboy (2) vs (0) _psmon_ (7-1)
9us: slimeball (2) vs (0) fasteddie_ (5-3)
9us: alex_lewis (2) vs (0) buckjam (s) (5-0)
8uk: _fresh_ (2) vs (0) anoneeemouse (5-2)
8uk: davybaumers (0) vs (2) scottyjr (3-5)
Str: legend_pot (2) vs (0) watchinawe
Str: miss_harriet (2) vs (0) _pot_luck_
Firestorm Phoenix (6) vs (8) Uprising
8us: (swp) (s) slimeball (1) vs (1) erigert (4-4)
8us: achpfsk (0) vs (2) dv8 (3-5)
9us: _payback_ (2) vs (0) _niall_ (5-2) (s)
9us: (swp) davybaumers (1) vs (1) nike (4-4)
8uk: _fresh_ (2) vs (0) r1p0m4n_v2 (6-2)
8uk: (swp) ghost_chili (0) vs (2) corsair (3-5)
Str: (swp) miss_harriet vs turtle1560
Str: joeyy (0) vs (2) clifton188
Firestorm Phoenix (8) vs (8) Pros - Complete (9-7)
8us: miss_harriet (2) vs (0) bigcjl2 (5-0)
8us: achpfsk (1) vs (1) crazy_greg (4-4)
9us: _payback_ (2) vs (0) nzym_visual (5-0)
9us: ghost_chili (0) vs (2) silent_hill (2-5)
8uk: _fresh_ (1) vs (1) tension (4-4)
8uk: davybaumers (1) vs (1) alfie1966 (4-4)
Str: legend_pot (2) vs (0) sean_92
Str: joeyy (0) vs (2) dvz
8us: achpfsk (1) vs (1) crazy_greg (4-4)
9us: _payback_ (2) vs (0) nzym_visual (5-0)
9us: ghost_chili (0) vs (2) silent_hill (2-5)
8uk: _fresh_ (1) vs (1) tension (4-4)
8uk: davybaumers (1) vs (1) alfie1966 (4-4)
Str: legend_pot (2) vs (0) sean_92
Str: joeyy (0) vs (2) dvz
Completed: 23/24
00:44 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
SL Fixture Set 1
Deadline: 27th Sept
Firestorm A
1. Firestorm A (8) vs (12) FPD A
legend_pot vs _huts24_
_fresh_ (2) vs (4) whocares8x8
achpfsk (3) vs (5) scottyjr
slimeball (3) vs (3) klien
2. Firestorm A (10) vs (8) PD's A
legend_pot vs bulletzzzz
_fresh_ (5) vs (1) punkpoet (s)
achpfsk (4) vs (2) jasonb
slimeball (1) vs (5) marksmith
3. Firestorm A (3) vs (10) Uprising A
legend_pot vs _niall_
_fresh_ (3) vs (4) horse10000
achpfsk vs fran_
slimeball (0) vs (6) turtle1560
4. Firestorm A (7) vs (6) Firestorm B
legend_pot vs davybaumers
_fresh_ (4) vs (2) ghost_chili (swp)
achpfsk (3) vs (4) joeyy
slimeball vs _payback_ (swp)
5. Firestorm A (12) vs (7) Pros A
legend_pot vs dvz (s)
_fresh_ (5) vs (1) triple_b
achpfsk (5) vs (2) vixen_xox
slimeball (2) vs (4) silent_hill
Firestorm B
1. Firestorm B (13) vs (7) PD's B
davybaumers (5) vs (2) w_hoolahan
_payback_ (5) vs (1) the__priest
joeyy vs _siber_man_
ghost_chili (3) vs (4) letsgochamp
2. Firestorm B (3) vs (11) Uprising C
davybaumers (3) vs (4) cgibson92
_payback_ (0) vs (7) corsair
joeyy vs dv8
ghost_chili vs nike
3. Firestorm B (6) vs (0) Rev's B
davybaumers (6) vs (0) _equality_
_payback_ vs mrmagic
joeyy vs derik_dalton
ghost_chili vs mad_matt
4. Firestorm B vs Pros B
davybaumers vs destroyer_v2
_payback_ vs crazy_greg (swp)
joeyy vs nzym_visual (swp)
ghost_chili vs tension
Deadline: 27th Sept
Firestorm A
1. Firestorm A (8) vs (12) FPD A
legend_pot vs _huts24_
_fresh_ (2) vs (4) whocares8x8
achpfsk (3) vs (5) scottyjr
slimeball (3) vs (3) klien
2. Firestorm A (10) vs (8) PD's A
legend_pot vs bulletzzzz
_fresh_ (5) vs (1) punkpoet (s)
achpfsk (4) vs (2) jasonb
slimeball (1) vs (5) marksmith
3. Firestorm A (3) vs (10) Uprising A
legend_pot vs _niall_
_fresh_ (3) vs (4) horse10000
achpfsk vs fran_
slimeball (0) vs (6) turtle1560
4. Firestorm A (7) vs (6) Firestorm B
legend_pot vs davybaumers
_fresh_ (4) vs (2) ghost_chili (swp)
achpfsk (3) vs (4) joeyy
slimeball vs _payback_ (swp)
5. Firestorm A (12) vs (7) Pros A
legend_pot vs dvz (s)
_fresh_ (5) vs (1) triple_b
achpfsk (5) vs (2) vixen_xox
slimeball (2) vs (4) silent_hill
Firestorm B
1. Firestorm B (13) vs (7) PD's B
davybaumers (5) vs (2) w_hoolahan
_payback_ (5) vs (1) the__priest
joeyy vs _siber_man_
ghost_chili (3) vs (4) letsgochamp
2. Firestorm B (3) vs (11) Uprising C
davybaumers (3) vs (4) cgibson92
_payback_ (0) vs (7) corsair
joeyy vs dv8
ghost_chili vs nike
3. Firestorm B (6) vs (0) Rev's B
davybaumers (6) vs (0) _equality_
_payback_ vs mrmagic
joeyy vs derik_dalton
ghost_chili vs mad_matt
4. Firestorm B vs Pros B
davybaumers vs destroyer_v2
_payback_ vs crazy_greg (swp)
joeyy vs nzym_visual (swp)
ghost_chili vs tension
00:44 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
FCL Fix Set 2
Deadline: 4th October 2015
Subs Permitted: 27th September 2015
Firestorm Phoenix (12) vs (3) F.P.D
miss_harriet vs the__saint
2pac786 (12) vs (3) blackcabman7
(swp) slimeball vs fasteddie_
(swp) alex_lewis vs _jesus_
friendyboy vs _flukez_
_knightmare_ vs anoneeemouse
ghost_chili vs ferretlady
achpfsk vs _psmon_
Firestorm Phoenix (25) vs (20) Revs
_fresh_ vs mad_matt
davybaumers (10) vs (5) tip_doctor
_payback_ (8) vs (7) tinie_v17
achpfsk (7) vs (8) poolbiird
legend_pot vs lolurmadbro
alex_lewis vs derik_dalton
joeyy vs veyron
friendyboy vs mrmagic
Firestorm Phoenix (17) vs (28) Uprising (2nd)
miss_harriet vs clifton188
_fresh_ (8) vs (7) cgibson92
davybaumers (3) vs (12) corsair
_payback_ (6) vs (9) turtle1560
(swp) ghost_chili vs erigert
legend_pot vs dv8
joeyy vs r1p0m4n_v2
(swp) slimeball vs rubber_duck
Completed: 7/24
Good Luck
Format: 5 X 8us, 9us & 8uk
Deadline: 4th October 2015
Subs Permitted: 27th September 2015
Firestorm Phoenix (12) vs (3) F.P.D
miss_harriet vs the__saint
2pac786 (12) vs (3) blackcabman7
(swp) slimeball vs fasteddie_
(swp) alex_lewis vs _jesus_
friendyboy vs _flukez_
_knightmare_ vs anoneeemouse
ghost_chili vs ferretlady
achpfsk vs _psmon_
Firestorm Phoenix (25) vs (20) Revs
_fresh_ vs mad_matt
davybaumers (10) vs (5) tip_doctor
_payback_ (8) vs (7) tinie_v17
achpfsk (7) vs (8) poolbiird
legend_pot vs lolurmadbro
alex_lewis vs derik_dalton
joeyy vs veyron
friendyboy vs mrmagic
Firestorm Phoenix (17) vs (28) Uprising (2nd)
miss_harriet vs clifton188
_fresh_ (8) vs (7) cgibson92
davybaumers (3) vs (12) corsair
_payback_ (6) vs (9) turtle1560
(swp) ghost_chili vs erigert
legend_pot vs dv8
joeyy vs r1p0m4n_v2
(swp) slimeball vs rubber_duck
Completed: 7/24
Good Luck
Format: 5 X 8us, 9us & 8uk
00:44 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
thanks mate.. just read all this FBL business.
Im not sure why Ryan wanted to replay it, whether the logout was deliberate or not, at the current scoreline, i dont see why both players didnt agree on 1-0..
In that situation, i would expect the player who logged out to offer the frame (given the scoreline) instead of waiting for the person who stayed online to have to either replay it or say 'im having it'.
anywho
Im not sure why Ryan wanted to replay it, whether the logout was deliberate or not, at the current scoreline, i dont see why both players didnt agree on 1-0..
In that situation, i would expect the player who logged out to offer the frame (given the scoreline) instead of waiting for the person who stayed online to have to either replay it or say 'im having it'.
anywho
00:45 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
I don't understand your logic..... It was 33-0. It wasn't 1-0, or 10<, it was 33...
^^^^ this^^^^
Harriet nailed it.
Also, if your going to mouth off about ash being desperate to win, I think you need to look at the poor sportsmanship of your own player even thinking he deserved a re-rack!! Pretty obvious should be 2-0, just taking advantage of Ryans good nature.
your guy replayed so its 1-1. will even ask him next time he is on, if a frame is replayed the quitted frame is gone as if it never happened.
your clan is REALLY clutching at straws now, its poor that a clan has to go to this length to win a clan game, wish i could say take the win but i believe i am right.
if legend claimed or even won the last frame, i would be saying unlucky sean, legend is a good player and we kept it close but because he replayed and sean won the last then that is the reason for all this tonight.
legend_pot legend_pot
2 - 0 wouldn't have been a fair result mate, im happy with the draw either way
Sent about 2 hours ago
dgeneratio
Online
dgeneratio
yeah, i couldnt argue with 2-0 you but i have to argue about ash trying to claim a replayed frame as he wants to win so bad.
Sent about 2 hours ago
we really need a ruling from a league staff member here or at least cap pros and firestorm threads for the night as its backwards and forwards.
your clan is REALLY clutching at straws now, its poor that a clan has to go to this length to win a clan game, wish i could say take the win but i believe i am right.
if legend claimed or even won the last frame, i would be saying unlucky sean, legend is a good player and we kept it close but because he replayed and sean won the last then that is the reason for all this tonight.
legend_pot legend_pot
2 - 0 wouldn't have been a fair result mate, im happy with the draw either way
Sent about 2 hours ago
dgeneratio
Online
dgeneratio
yeah, i couldnt argue with 2-0 you but i have to argue about ash trying to claim a replayed frame as he wants to win so bad.
Sent about 2 hours ago
we really need a ruling from a league staff member here or at least cap pros and firestorm threads for the night as its backwards and forwards.
I don't understand your logic..... It was 33-0. It wasn't 1-0, or 10<, it was 33...
^^^^ this^^^^
Harriet nailed it.
Also, if your going to mouth off about ash being desperate to win, I think you need to look at the poor sportsmanship of your own player even thinking he deserved a re-rack!! Pretty obvious should be 2-0, just taking advantage of Ryans good nature.
00:51 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
IF the frame was less than 50% complete then by all means replay the frame but 33/35 is nearly 100%. IF it's more than 50% played then surely the fair outcome is to award the frame to the player who completed the most?
It was unfortunate what happened to sean_92 but that doesn't stop or subtract the actual effort our player put in to reach a RUN of 33.
It was unfortunate what happened to sean_92 but that doesn't stop or subtract the actual effort our player put in to reach a RUN of 33.
00:53 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
do you ever read what you post ?, why are you being this way , your team mate decided to replay the frame which was very good sportsmanship from him. he made the decision so why cant you accept it and move on rather all of this
How do we know you didn't instruct him to leave the room at 33-0 behind?
How do we know and yourself for that matter that it wasn't a rage quit?
How do we know with him leaving the game when 0-33 that didn't affect Ryan to continue to run and win the frame in that 1 visit?
The simple answer is WE DON'T.
What is evident, plain and simple is we won the 1st frame regardless and out of good sportsmanship and fairness you and your player should acknowledge you're player was in the wrong therefore you lose the frame.
Accidents do happen but this decision is absolutely appalling and hardly sets a precedent for future Straight games. If you're losing, don't fret, just leave the room and you can replay it.
Sorry but whatever spiel you want to preach James I'm not interested - also I disagree with the League Runner having the overall decision as the result clearly benefits his current team so therefore removes all impartiality. Nothing about a bias just impartiality.
Just do the right thing and admit in all fairness we won 9-7 and legend_pot did what he needed to do and that is run 33 in frame 1 and won the 2nd frame - it's in black and white on his results page.
How do we know and yourself for that matter that it wasn't a rage quit?
How do we know with him leaving the game when 0-33 that didn't affect Ryan to continue to run and win the frame in that 1 visit?
The simple answer is WE DON'T.
What is evident, plain and simple is we won the 1st frame regardless and out of good sportsmanship and fairness you and your player should acknowledge you're player was in the wrong therefore you lose the frame.
Accidents do happen but this decision is absolutely appalling and hardly sets a precedent for future Straight games. If you're losing, don't fret, just leave the room and you can replay it.
Sorry but whatever spiel you want to preach James I'm not interested - also I disagree with the League Runner having the overall decision as the result clearly benefits his current team so therefore removes all impartiality. Nothing about a bias just impartiality.
Just do the right thing and admit in all fairness we won 9-7 and legend_pot did what he needed to do and that is run 33 in frame 1 and won the 2nd frame - it's in black and white on his results page.
do you ever read what you post ?, why are you being this way , your team mate decided to replay the frame which was very good sportsmanship from him. he made the decision so why cant you accept it and move on rather all of this
00:57 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
by the way james is one of the nicest people on this site and on snooker too , he always trys to do the right thing , so he would never tell one of his clan members to do anything like you have suggest
you say you want people to leave you be and let you get on with things , fine but that works both ways , you cant go around accusing people of hings like you have , if you want to be respected then you have to respect others
you say you want people to leave you be and let you get on with things , fine but that works both ways , you cant go around accusing people of hings like you have , if you want to be respected then you have to respect others
00:58 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
I read every word about 10 times, therefore meant every word.
Ryan made a great gesture but when all is said and done the frame should be awarded as over 50% complete automatically.
Anything short of that is wrong IMO and makes a mockery of the whole game type. Set the precedent and get it right, before next time I'm losing or any of our players are 0-33 just press the little X in the top right hand corner and replay the frame.
How many will ever get replayed? The answer is NONE
Had this been the other way around you'd be kicking and screaming for the 2 points so less of the hypocrisy please.
Don't abuse Ryans good nature.
Ryan made a great gesture but when all is said and done the frame should be awarded as over 50% complete automatically.
Anything short of that is wrong IMO and makes a mockery of the whole game type. Set the precedent and get it right, before next time I'm losing or any of our players are 0-33 just press the little X in the top right hand corner and replay the frame.
How many will ever get replayed? The answer is NONE
Had this been the other way around you'd be kicking and screaming for the 2 points so less of the hypocrisy please.
Don't abuse Ryans good nature.
01:00 Sat 19 Sep 15 (BST) [Link]
The point in the frame is irrelevant, legend pot had just had a run of 33, Sean is more than capable of knocking in a 35. I have had a player leave while I only had one ball and a black and I replayed as i would never take a frame and always happy to replay, which is my choice. Legend pot had the option to claim the frame or replay the frame. He chose to replay the frame like a true sportsman which some will see as a nice thing to do and others who prefer to win will say he should have taken the frame. The ruling has always been it is up to the player involved so why we have had pages of arguments I have no idea.
IF the frame was less than 50% complete then by all means replay the frame but 33/35 is nearly 100%. IF it's more than 50% played then surely the fair outcome is to award the frame to the player who completed the most?
It was unfortunate what happened to sean_92 but that doesn't stop or subtract the actual effort our player put in to reach a RUN of 33.
It was unfortunate what happened to sean_92 but that doesn't stop or subtract the actual effort our player put in to reach a RUN of 33.
The point in the frame is irrelevant, legend pot had just had a run of 33, Sean is more than capable of knocking in a 35. I have had a player leave while I only had one ball and a black and I replayed as i would never take a frame and always happy to replay, which is my choice. Legend pot had the option to claim the frame or replay the frame. He chose to replay the frame like a true sportsman which some will see as a nice thing to do and others who prefer to win will say he should have taken the frame. The ruling has always been it is up to the player involved so why we have had pages of arguments I have no idea.
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Firestorm Phoenix: 'Ready To Set The Leagues Alight' :)
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Clan and League Chat.
Back to Forum List.