Just make it that once someone is removed from a team they can't join any team until transfer window, including their former team.

Actually I figured out the best fix. Everyone in clans plays for Uprising and Pros. And we have 2 teams of like 50 players each and no one actually plays except the top 16 players.

that would fix it yeah but with site in decline it is risky.

I think abusing the loophole is far more risky for the site or at least the league.

Take it up on the league forum then the runners can see these ideas

could be but only ways it can be broken...

a) runner changes rules
b) benched player leaves

if neither happen, i will use what resources i have to give my players some games, if someone goes inactive then theres cover.

i still think its because some clans can't get 16 players.

horse10000
buckjam
faust
punkpoet

What do you guys think about this?

well if ya take a horse with a mispellelled 2nd combined with an exhaust (for a dyslexic 3rd) with the 4th ya can imagine his 2 jobs

Edited at 23:09 Thu 20/08/15 (BST)

Deep...

deep? dnt start me off..

milani palani consuertos monueris abiba

That's a little flippant mate. We've run at 16 players every single season, and we're doing the same this season - with no bench!

I have no problem with James's bench to be honest. You look at his team and you can see at least two inactive players that wouldn't really benefit another team. It's not like the situation when Phoenix Nights killed Black Magic and Ballbreakers by recruiting some of their most active players. That said, I still hold to the belief there are enough players to form another clan and I think it's a massive shame that it's not happened.

It is up to James how he wants to run his team, the rules allow him to swap and rotate if he wishes. There is a downside doing the rotation as their is only one team list now so if he removes a player, they will no longer be available to play in fixtures that they could have played in, and the player swapping in would be unavailable to play in any existing games that had been released prior to the rotation.

I see both sides, but like faust has pointed out, the 'bench players' are players that are currently 'out of service' so would be of no benefit to another team even if they weren't in this one. That being said, if a player didn't want to be here (or anywhere else) they wouldn't be.

Ain't a problem for 99.9%

But of course

i dont wanna see any more slander on this thread against my team or captain.

enough is enough.

Slander lol Pretty sure only 2 of us have been slandered

1 team, like we did last season?