The Unbeatables ~ We Aim To Pot, Not Plot ;)
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Clan and League Chat.
Back to Forum List.
12:59 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
Im afraid that the match uve played , wont stand. For it to stand, both captains of respective teams should agree on it, and with what i read i see that huts doesnt approve that sub.
Isn't Harry vice or co-captain???
yes stu he is but spoke to harry a minute ago and he agrees with me no sub was made nor agreed . ive also spoke with others that know everything/ rule wise and they agree with me too .
I have never seen anyone on here so desperate for a game to go to default. Harry spoke to me yesterday and spoke about a sub and to restart the game from 0-0. I said i had no issues with it to get game played but you would need to speak to chris to see if he would allow it as a one off to get games completed.
Thanks hippes for all the effort and nice win against braveheart. Thanks to him also for stepping in to play. We will just need to wait and see and if it goes to default, i think we can pretty safely say that we couldn't have tried anything else to prevent it, I don't think Black Scorpions can say the same.
And yes harry and braveheart would be welcome in UB anytime faust, when is the transfer window?
I really have to say this because I am workin a double shift 2mara and wouldn't have had the chance to play this at all.
To whom it may concern, you know who you are, I thank you so, so much for your message letting me know about rule 7.5 or whatever it was. You helped me out big time as I do my utmost to get matches done.
thank you again, I hope some day I can do the same for you
To whom it may concern, you know who you are, I thank you so, so much for your message letting me know about rule 7.5 or whatever it was. You helped me out big time as I do my utmost to get matches done.
thank you again, I hope some day I can do the same for you
tho I'm not reading up on the rules lol
Im afraid that the match uve played , wont stand. For it to stand, both captains of respective teams should agree on it, and with what i read i see that huts doesnt approve that sub.
Isn't Harry vice or co-captain???
yes stu he is but spoke to harry a minute ago and he agrees with me no sub was made nor agreed . ive also spoke with others that know everything/ rule wise and they agree with me too .
I have never seen anyone on here so desperate for a game to go to default. Harry spoke to me yesterday and spoke about a sub and to restart the game from 0-0. I said i had no issues with it to get game played but you would need to speak to chris to see if he would allow it as a one off to get games completed.
Thanks hippes for all the effort and nice win against braveheart. Thanks to him also for stepping in to play. We will just need to wait and see and if it goes to default, i think we can pretty safely say that we couldn't have tried anything else to prevent it, I don't think Black Scorpions can say the same.
And yes harry and braveheart would be welcome in UB anytime faust, when is the transfer window?
13:12 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
GRAND SLAM CUP - ROUND 1
Black Scorpions 6 v 10 Unbeatables
Deadline: Sunday 31st August
FCL and SL normal format applies
10 racks of US8, 12 Racks of US9, 10 Racks of UK8 and 4 Racks of Straight
Nice win in the cup UB
Black Scorpions 6 v 10 Unbeatables
FCL
walktall (4) v (11) _marc_
triple_b (8) v (7) lateo1993
SL
raker (6) v (7) poolbiird
silenthill (6) v (7) mrmagic
8us (x10)
mikeybboy (3) v (7) horse10000
9us (x12)
braveheart (5) v (7) hippesville
8uk (x10)
w_hoolahan (6) v (4) _niall_
STR (x4)
2awesome2win (3) v (1) franer_
walktall (4) v (11) _marc_
triple_b (8) v (7) lateo1993
SL
raker (6) v (7) poolbiird
silenthill (6) v (7) mrmagic
8us (x10)
mikeybboy (3) v (7) horse10000
9us (x12)
braveheart (5) v (7) hippesville
8uk (x10)
w_hoolahan (6) v (4) _niall_
STR (x4)
2awesome2win (3) v (1) franer_
Deadline: Sunday 31st August
FCL and SL normal format applies
10 racks of US8, 12 Racks of US9, 10 Racks of UK8 and 4 Racks of Straight
Nice win in the cup UB
13:14 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
FBL - Fixture 2
Unbeatables 10 v 6 Phoenix Storm
Baize Burners 6 v 10 Unbeatables
Deadline: Sunday 31st August
Can anyone who has not played against Baize Burners sub in and play pointless if they see them on as it is deadline day
Edited by forum moderator horse10000, at 21:08 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
Unbeatables 10 v 6 Phoenix Storm
8us
_marc_ (5) v (1) joeyy
t1pster (2) v (5) bigcjl2
9us
hippesville (1) v (5) dbno
mrmagic (5) v (3) thegame26
8uk
_egotistical (5) v (1) davybaumers
_niall_ (5) v (0) nathyboy
Straight
turtle1560 (2) v (0) dv8
franer_ (0) v (2) legend_pot
_marc_ (5) v (1) joeyy
t1pster (2) v (5) bigcjl2
9us
hippesville (1) v (5) dbno
mrmagic (5) v (3) thegame26
8uk
_egotistical (5) v (1) davybaumers
_niall_ (5) v (0) nathyboy
Straight
turtle1560 (2) v (0) dv8
franer_ (0) v (2) legend_pot
Baize Burners 6 v 10 Unbeatables
8us
pocket_power (5) v (2) horse10000
dark_shadow (1) v (5) mrmagic
9us
pointless (1) v (5) hippesville
santosh_nema (5) v (3) lateo1993
8uk
todd2000 (1) v (5) _egotistical
kris (5) v (1) poolbiird
Straight
veyron (0) v (2) franer_
cheeseburger (0) v (2) turtle1560
pocket_power (5) v (2) horse10000
dark_shadow (1) v (5) mrmagic
9us
pointless (1) v (5) hippesville
santosh_nema (5) v (3) lateo1993
8uk
todd2000 (1) v (5) _egotistical
kris (5) v (1) poolbiird
Straight
veyron (0) v (2) franer_
cheeseburger (0) v (2) turtle1560
Deadline: Sunday 31st August
Can anyone who has not played against Baize Burners sub in and play pointless if they see them on as it is deadline day
Edited by forum moderator horse10000, at 21:08 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
13:15 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
FCL NEW SET
Unbeatables 28 v 32 Uprising
turtle1560 (12) v (3) derik_dalton
hippesville (6) v (9) erigert
mrmagic (5) v (10) pirate_steve
greyhound v clifton188
_marc_ v cgibson92
_niall_ v sharky89
_egotistical (5) v (10) r1p0m4n_v2
franer_v ritcho
Unbeatables 31 v 29 Phoenix Storm
hippesville v dv8
_marc_ (5) v (10) joeyy
_niall_ (8) v (7) shadwell7
t1pster v dbno
franer_ v legend_pot
mrmagic (5) v (10) davybaumers
horse10000 v nathyboy
turtle1560 (13) v (2) friendyboy
Deadline is the 7th of September lads.
Edited at 13:17 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
Unbeatables 28 v 32 Uprising
turtle1560 (12) v (3) derik_dalton
hippesville (6) v (9) erigert
mrmagic (5) v (10) pirate_steve
greyhound v clifton188
_marc_ v cgibson92
_niall_ v sharky89
_egotistical (5) v (10) r1p0m4n_v2
franer_v ritcho
Unbeatables 31 v 29 Phoenix Storm
hippesville v dv8
_marc_ (5) v (10) joeyy
_niall_ (8) v (7) shadwell7
t1pster v dbno
franer_ v legend_pot
mrmagic (5) v (10) davybaumers
horse10000 v nathyboy
turtle1560 (13) v (2) friendyboy
Deadline is the 7th of September lads.
Edited at 13:17 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
13:16 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
SL, new set 3:
Wolf Pack B 6 vs 6 Unbeatables A
deano1888 v horse10000
emmajackson v lateo1993
kaperisk (6) v (6) poolbiird
thegreatone7 v mad_matt
Wolf Pack A 10 vs 26 Unbeatables A
x_connor (5) v (7) lateo1993
chapster_7 (3) v (9) poolbiird
alex_lewis v greyhound
blackcabman7 (2) v (10) mad_matt
The Professionals A 11 vs 2 Unbeatables B
dvz (11) v (2) turtle1560
trickster v _niall_
beenjammin v t1pster
_wales_lad_ v _egotistical
The Professionals B 31 vs 18 Unbeatables B
Deadline: Sunday 7th September
Lets go UB!!
====================================
Players Championship
davybaumers vs horse10000
rossunited vs greyhound
Format: 4 frames each of 8us,9us,8uk. Bonus points for Runouts and GB's.
Deadline: Sunday 7th September
Edited at 12:10 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
Wolf Pack B 6 vs 6 Unbeatables A
deano1888 v horse10000
emmajackson v lateo1993
kaperisk (6) v (6) poolbiird
thegreatone7 v mad_matt
Wolf Pack A 10 vs 26 Unbeatables A
x_connor (5) v (7) lateo1993
chapster_7 (3) v (9) poolbiird
alex_lewis v greyhound
blackcabman7 (2) v (10) mad_matt
The Professionals A 11 vs 2 Unbeatables B
dvz (11) v (2) turtle1560
trickster v _niall_
beenjammin v t1pster
_wales_lad_ v _egotistical
The Professionals B 31 vs 18 Unbeatables B
davey_1985 (5) v (8) _marc_
barkley20 (8) v (4) t1pster
m0nster (10) v (2) _egotistical
im_crap_alot (8) v (4) franer_
barkley20 (8) v (4) t1pster
m0nster (10) v (2) _egotistical
im_crap_alot (8) v (4) franer_
Deadline: Sunday 7th September
Lets go UB!!
====================================
Players Championship
davybaumers vs horse10000
rossunited vs greyhound
Format: 4 frames each of 8us,9us,8uk. Bonus points for Runouts and GB's.
Deadline: Sunday 7th September
Edited at 12:10 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:55 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
Just to put this out there, the arguments all seem to hinge on huts permission. Well if you read the rules word for word, rule 7.5 at no point says it needs a captains permission to approve this starting from 0-0 in order to get games played, it specifically says clan. As braveheart is a member of the clan is that not the clan making the attempt therefor making it valid. As for a sub needing permission, was this not played after midnight making it played on deadline day making it any players able to sub themselves in? If you follow the rules to the letter the game should stand as all rules were followed.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:59 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
100% agree isnt the whole point of the way the super league system works to be as flexible as possible ? well here is an example of how to use the rules in its proper form .. and there is an example by a team trying their utmost to allow this to goto default.
Just to put this out there, the arguments all seem to hinge on huts permission. Well if you read the rules word for word, rule 7.5 at no point says it needs a captains permission to approve this starting from 0-0 in order to get games played, it specifically says clan. As braveheart is a member of the clan is that not the clan making the attempt therefor making it valid. As for a sub needing permission, was this not played after midnight making it played on deadline day making it any players able to sub themselves in? If you follow the rules to the letter the game should stand as all rules were followed.
100% agree isnt the whole point of the way the super league system works to be as flexible as possible ? well here is an example of how to use the rules in its proper form .. and there is an example by a team trying their utmost to allow this to goto default.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:10 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
100% agree isnt the whole point of the way the super league system works to be as flexible as possible ? well here is an example of how to use the rules in its proper form .. and there is an example by a team trying their utmost to allow this to goto default.you know me, I don't get involved in arguments, I'm just stating the game under the rules should stand.
Just to put this out there, the arguments all seem to hinge on huts permission. Well if you read the rules word for word, rule 7.5 at no point says it needs a captains permission to approve this starting from 0-0 in order to get games played, it specifically says clan. As braveheart is a member of the clan is that not the clan making the attempt therefor making it valid. As for a sub needing permission, was this not played after midnight making it played on deadline day making it any players able to sub themselves in? If you follow the rules to the letter the game should stand as all rules were followed.
100% agree isnt the whole point of the way the super league system works to be as flexible as possible ? well here is an example of how to use the rules in its proper form .. and there is an example by a team trying their utmost to allow this to goto default.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:11 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
100% agree isnt the whole point of the way the super league system works to be as flexible as possible ? well here is an example of how to use the rules in its proper form .. and there is an example by a team trying their utmost to allow this to goto default.you know me, I don't get involved in arguments, I'm just stating the game under the rules should stand.
you know me mate .. i do my utmost to stay out of other peoples business and i never comment on things that dont involve me but i just thought i would help unbeatables out a bit in agreeing with you :).
Just to put this out there, the arguments all seem to hinge on huts permission. Well if you read the rules word for word, rule 7.5 at no point says it needs a captains permission to approve this starting from 0-0 in order to get games played, it specifically says clan. As braveheart is a member of the clan is that not the clan making the attempt therefor making it valid. As for a sub needing permission, was this not played after midnight making it played on deadline day making it any players able to sub themselves in? If you follow the rules to the letter the game should stand as all rules were followed.
100% agree isnt the whole point of the way the super league system works to be as flexible as possible ? well here is an example of how to use the rules in its proper form .. and there is an example by a team trying their utmost to allow this to goto default.
you know me mate .. i do my utmost to stay out of other peoples business and i never comment on things that dont involve me but i just thought i would help unbeatables out a bit in agreeing with you :).
14:12 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
100% agree isnt the whole point of the way the super league system works to be as flexible as possible ? well here is an example of how to use the rules in its proper form .. and there is an example by a team trying their utmost to allow this to goto default.you know me, I don't get involved in arguments, I'm just stating the game under the rules should stand.
well fingers crossed it stands for something. I'm not au fait with the rules, but here's hopin
Just to put this out there, the arguments all seem to hinge on huts permission. Well if you read the rules word for word, rule 7.5 at no point says it needs a captains permission to approve this starting from 0-0 in order to get games played, it specifically says clan. As braveheart is a member of the clan is that not the clan making the attempt therefor making it valid. As for a sub needing permission, was this not played after midnight making it played on deadline day making it any players able to sub themselves in? If you follow the rules to the letter the game should stand as all rules were followed.
100% agree isnt the whole point of the way the super league system works to be as flexible as possible ? well here is an example of how to use the rules in its proper form .. and there is an example by a team trying their utmost to allow this to goto default.
well fingers crossed it stands for something. I'm not au fait with the rules, but here's hopin
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:23 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
Both players were online sitting in the chat room at the same time, hippesville made every effort last night knowing that were pretty much his deadline night due to work commitments. Only obtrusive people were the opposition, in this scenario. Were no reason why they couldn't have played so hippesville did whatever he could to try decimate the idea of a default for this particular match.
Effort and application alone will be in his favour surely. I'd say let it stand, even though not mutually agreed as one were trying prove an invalid point when were easier to allow common sense to prevail and just play the fixture.
It were me who showed him the rules hence me speaking up now. Just tried to help.
Effort and application alone will be in his favour surely. I'd say let it stand, even though not mutually agreed as one were trying prove an invalid point when were easier to allow common sense to prevail and just play the fixture.
It were me who showed him the rules hence me speaking up now. Just tried to help.
14:24 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
I would much rather face the Default Scorpions in the next round, so my opinion isn't motivated by self interest, but what is best for the integrity of the league. Every season we see individuals trying to manipulate the default system, and I'm sick of it. What possible justification could anyone give to not let the game stand? Most agree we want as little restrictions as possible in the leagues, and huts deliberately forcing a default is detrimental to the entire competition.
Is this the first time in history Pro's, Uprising and Phoenix have all been in agreement? I think that says everything!!!
Edited at 11:28 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
Is this the first time in history Pro's, Uprising and Phoenix have all been in agreement? I think that says everything!!!
Edited at 11:28 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
14:30 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
lmao love it! have I brought yaz all together???!!!
can we see someone clearly for what they try to do?
here endeth the lesson, hippes of gazereth
I would much rather face the Default Scorpions in the next round, so my opinion isn't motivated by self interest, but what is best for the integrity of the league. Every season we see individuals trying to manipulate the default system, and I'm sick of it. What possible justification could anyone give to not let the game stand? Most agree we want as little restrictions as possible in the leagues, and huts deliberately forcing a default is detrimental to the entire competition.
Is this the first time in history Pro's, Uprising and Phoenix have all been in agreement? I think that says everything!!!
Edited at 11:28 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
Is this the first time in history Pro's, Uprising and Phoenix have all been in agreement? I think that says everything!!!
Edited at 11:28 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
lmao love it! have I brought yaz all together???!!!
can we see someone clearly for what they try to do?
here endeth the lesson, hippes of gazereth
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:33 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
pros and uprising are pretty much always in agreement ; )
I would much rather face the Default Scorpions in the next round, so my opinion isn't motivated by self interest, but what is best for the integrity of the league. Every season we see individuals trying to manipulate the default system, and I'm sick of it. What possible justification could anyone give to not let the game stand? Most agree we want as little restrictions as possible in the leagues, and huts deliberately forcing a default is detrimental to the entire competition.
Is this the first time in history Pro's, Uprising and Phoenix have all been in agreement? I think that says everything!!!
Edited at 11:28 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
Is this the first time in history Pro's, Uprising and Phoenix have all been in agreement? I think that says everything!!!
Edited at 11:28 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
pros and uprising are pretty much always in agreement ; )
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:33 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
lmao love it! have I brought yaz all together???!!!
can we see someone clearly for what they try to do?
here endeth the lesson, hippes of gazereth
gazereth of hippes ville you truly are a clever man ;)
I would much rather face the Default Scorpions in the next round, so my opinion isn't motivated by self interest, but what is best for the integrity of the league. Every season we see individuals trying to manipulate the default system, and I'm sick of it. What possible justification could anyone give to not let the game stand? Most agree we want as little restrictions as possible in the leagues, and huts deliberately forcing a default is detrimental to the entire competition.
Is this the first time in history Pro's, Uprising and Phoenix have all been in agreement? I think that says everything!!!
Edited at 11:28 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
Is this the first time in history Pro's, Uprising and Phoenix have all been in agreement? I think that says everything!!!
Edited at 11:28 Sun 31/08/14 (BST)
lmao love it! have I brought yaz all together???!!!
can we see someone clearly for what they try to do?
here endeth the lesson, hippes of gazereth
gazereth of hippes ville you truly are a clever man ;)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:34 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
FCL vs Unbeatables
SUB
Was: king8ball1 vs hippesville
Is Now: dv8 vs hippesville
* time zones are conflicting and both online now.
SUB
Was: king8ball1 vs hippesville
Is Now: dv8 vs hippesville
* time zones are conflicting and both online now.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:35 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
woah ash .. you have come to the way of the real world *pats on back*
this is what i was on about the other day mate .. well done :)
FCL vs Unbeatables
SUB
Was: king8ball1 vs hippesville
Is Now: dv8 vs hippesville
* time zones are conflicting and both online now.
SUB
Was: king8ball1 vs hippesville
Is Now: dv8 vs hippesville
* time zones are conflicting and both online now.
woah ash .. you have come to the way of the real world *pats on back*
this is what i was on about the other day mate .. well done :)
14:44 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
woah ash .. you have come to the way of the real world *pats on back*
this is what i was on about the other day mate .. well done :)
lol matty, but if it hadn't been for ash last night, someone's true colours wouldn't have shone so brightly last night. actually want to marry him now
FCL vs Unbeatables
SUB
Was: king8ball1 vs hippesville
Is Now: dv8 vs hippesville
* time zones are conflicting and both online now.
SUB
Was: king8ball1 vs hippesville
Is Now: dv8 vs hippesville
* time zones are conflicting and both online now.
woah ash .. you have come to the way of the real world *pats on back*
this is what i was on about the other day mate .. well done :)
lol matty, but if it hadn't been for ash last night, someone's true colours wouldn't have shone so brightly last night. actually want to marry him now
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
14:50 Sun 31 Aug 14 (BST) [Link]
Did I not make my point clear enough to you reprobates? It's irrelevant what you think should or shouldn't happen, under the rules the result HAS to stand. It doesn't matter what huts did or didn't do.
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
The Unbeatables ~ We Aim To Pot, Not Plot ;)
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Clan and League Chat.
Back to Forum List.