I agree as for a long time i thought it was against the rules tbh.
I just don't like it when people make things harder than it is.
I think most can read between the lines.

anyways can we put the results up yet? lol

FCL Sets 3 & 4
The Professionals 35 v 10 Pocket Dynamos

_redherring_ v lfc12
franer_ 12 v 3 welshgizy19
liam_scfc 11 v 4 silenthill
davey_1985 v snoox
techno v the__king
onevisit v blueberry
_nerdzz_ 12 v 3 majidhbutt
sixty_plus v jasonb


________________________________________
Pocket Dynamos 24 v 36 Phoenix Storm

fastboysam 5 v 10 bigcjl2
punkpoet 4 v 11 friendyboy
silenthill 10 v 5 shadwell17
walktall 5 v 10 chapster_7
jasonb v thegame26 Sub
askingfan v patrick_nl
cue_control_ v ooo_u_tap_2
marksmith v skiller10

5 racks of 8b 9b 8buk
DEADLINE 9th March
Please contact your opponents
Gdluck all..



Edited at 16:12 Tue 25/02/14 (GMT)

FBL Fixture sets 1 & 2

Fighting Eagles 7 v 3 Pocket Dynamos

8 US flash_is_bac v fry06
8 US _noodles_ 4 v 2 punkpoet
9 US jame2010s v snoox
9 US triple_b 2 v 4 cue_control_
8 UK its_me 3 v 3 jasonb
8 UK breksis 6 v 0 ang3l
STR _pro__frog_ 2 v 0 marksmith
STR emmajackson v silenthill



_____________________________________


Pocket Dynamos 2 v 10 The Professionals

8 US lfc12 0 v 6 beenjammin
8 US fastboysam v cphaynes
9 US punkpoet v techno
9 US the__king 1 v 5 dvz
8 UK jasonb 1 v 5 _redherring_
8 UK welshgizy 2 v 4 liam_scfc
STR silenthill 1 v 1 franer_
STR marksmith 1 v 1 sixty_plus


Games - 6 racks of 8bus, 9b or 8buk 2 racks of straight

Deadline 2nd march.

Gdluck all ..

Players championship

_pro__frog_ 7 v 6 askingfan
cue_control_ 4 v 8 friendyboy
turtle1560 14 (VC) v 0 punkpoet(C)
fry06 6 v 7_egotistical
jasonb 6 v 7 x_connor
blueberry v its_me
majidhbutt opponent powea012 pulled out
walktall v the__king
Deadline 5th march 2014

This is an optional competition, if you arn't interested just post on either here or the players champ thread.
If you do not have a game it means you have a BYE.

games are 4 racks of 8b 9b 8buk
Each rack won by a player scores a point. In addition one point is scored for each 'event' recorded. An 'event' is classed as a Golden Break or a Run Out
Sudden death 1 rack decider
chosen by the winner of the 12th rack

Done lols ..

Well done lol
Maybe people were on a fag break and will continue bickering again.
Funny thing is I reckon we will get blamed ...

Blamed for what ? only person to blame is the one that couldnt give a good reason for not playing his game again lols ..

Just in general lol
Clans eh.
I don't know maybe I need a couple day off from this silly game.
I do have a game with techno he hasnt replied and has been on once in 7 days....
fattmikee and co dont think a sub is needed.
Feel free to sub me out if they sub someone in I'm not really bothered and playing badly.

EDIT hes a pros player but same thing lol

Edited at 16:08 Tue 25/02/14 (GMT)

Well give it a few more days or week end see what happens zac first..

kingdadcool has messaged me to say he will sub in for flash, hopefully catch him online tonight

Glad your sorted, but i still dont have a sub for emmajackson.. I think im gonna give up tbh. It really infuriates me when another clan ignores you time an time again, and thats all fighting eagles are doing! They don't even deserve to be in a league, the way they handle things is totally unprofessional.. Cheers Zac for getting me away from those morons! Anyway Zac message me on fb when they finally decide to act and put a sub in.

And i'll be straight online, unless im in college! Cya

wow 4 pages lol ,,

Yes lol

i did ask for subs again ..

I know and kingdadcool who is apparently meant to be a captain has updated his thread and ignored you completely!!

My point is how can teams preach integrity regarding subs whilst putting their weakest teams against the strongest in the league which affects the whole title race and also how can they call anyone a chicken when they chose to play our team rather than pros themselves and put some sacrificial lambs against the title contenders...not much fun for their players in that game either.
It also gets posted that their team selection is none of our business, well our subs are none of yours then.
My posts are on the topic at hand as always Zac and you don't control the forum as to who posts where.
The other point is you and angel whine about everything when we play, it's tedious you can sub in who you want into any of our games and we don't care...it's your squad, your business.
Think personally the real reason for the latest whinge is that you were expecting a different scoreline with our strongest team against TFS and yours against us.

Hold up! It was me that mentioned integrity, and I specifically meant over the tactical subs thing, and I was generalising. Most of the examples you have used there are nothing to do with me, and not relevant to my post.

If however PD's have picked their strongest v you and their weakest v Pro's - that's understandable tbh. When you play 2 better teams - the standard tactic is to pick your best players against the weaker out the two. It's simple damage limitation, and they'd defo stand more chance of getting points against Phoenix than they would Pro's.

Zac has mentioned integrity and also the 'spirit of clans' in a message to me too.
The first half of my post was explaining my stance to you in reply to your post (how can you integrity only apply to subs not selections lol)
Second half was replying to Zac, sorry if that wasn't clear.
You always preach how you have total faith in your squad now you have changed that tune totally to the best playing the worst team? sorry but that's a load of rubbish, the best players should be in the games against the best teams obviously they are going to get a lot more points that way and less experienced players don't get fed up with the leagues and quit because they are getting used as sacrificial lambs.

I'd have to say that getting 24 points with 4 games left, against the team that took your best player is a damn good return. Much more than the same players could hope to get v Pro's. I see nothing wrong with it!

Initial team selection has always been tactical. Second guessing your opposing captain, sacrificing weaker players etc has always been part of selection - and it's an enjoyable part of clans. Tactical subbing is different, as you've evaluated the opposition after the release. I have nothing against it, but if one team is doing it and none of the others are - then it becomes an issue. Hence the need for a discussion. Surely you can see that making a sub with some half arsed story is much worse than just openly playing a tactical sub?