Rule doesn't need changed at all, their is punishment for a reason, next time we should sign someone that signs in more than twice - three times in a two week period There is going to be punishment on any partial game in the Pre Season and normal league games this season, usually to the player that left the game in the first place.

Zante - All games are urged to be played, can not pick a choose.

lol

FCL Pre Season

15/16 Complete

Uprising (71) v (49) Untouchables

Completed

P. Dynamos (48) v (67) Uprising

ang3l (6) v (9) erigert
123jason (2) v (8) kaleidoscope
marksmith (6) v (9) i_am_blessed
mfc_ss (6) v (9) the_9_ball
fastboysam (3) v (12) cgibson92
lfc12 (7) v (8) bluenose1872
punkpoet (8) v (7) zantetsukenz
bigcjl2 (10) v (5) faust

Good luck people, these games are to qualify to get into the FCL league. We must complete at least 14/16 games!

Deadline: 2/6/13 @ Midnight!

FBL Pre Season

Underdogs (3) vs (23) Uprising

8US
umanga (2) v (5) cgibson92
kathleen_b v angry_bacon
9US
ronald_faja v bluenose1872
lewis147 v derik_dalton
8UK
girl_power7 v onua0767
jimmyd20 (1) v (6) v zantetsukenz
Straight
player_0 (0) v (6) i_am_blessed
kopiteking01 v pirate_steve
Killer
0 - 6

7 games of 8US, 9US or 8UK. 3 games of Straight. 1 game of Killer.

Deadline: 3rd June 2013

Super League

Snooker Squad v Uprising



Pocket Dynamos v Uprising


Deadline: 9/6/13

~ 0 ~ 0 ~ O

But why should a player be forced to log in more than twice a week? He came online to play the fixture at a time both players agreed to, and dedicated enough time to complete the games? Why should any player have to do anymore than that? I don't think we should punish players that have stuff to do in their lives outside of funkypool, especially in this circumstance - when the games would've been completed if kaleidoscope hadn't had the audacity to play too well vs Jason.

Yes, kaleidoscope did say at the time that was his only opportunity to play, and waited online an hour after jason ran away without a word hoping to complete the fixture. If Jason had warned us that he was going to quit as soon as he started losing badly, we wouldn't of started the match in the first place. Now, it looks like it's our player that's going to be punished because your player can't take a defeat. It's ridiculous that we're trapped in this position. What's to stop me telling every player to log out every time they're taking a beating?

_________________

You cant assume jason ran off for the sake it , i actually dont think he would have just ran off , .. Am sure he has a reason why he left ,but he did return in plenty of time.. Also maybe Scope has had other things to do aswell . thanks..

Just saying that we don't need to remove a player Jay not that we shouldn't try and get it finished. jason left the game with no warning, kaleidoscope said it was the only time he could really play. Jason should've finished it there and then instead of going off. (If it was because he was losing that's a bit of a silly reason as the score means nothing)

also if both players mutually agree to stop then i don't think players should be punished.

ill post my idea in discussion thread soon

It comes with playing in clans Stu, and notice that i never mentioned anything about Scope as it was Jason that left in the first place, for whatever reason. Ang3l we can presume because he did exactly that and then spent 3 - 4 days offline.

We already have slimeball for one - three log ins do we really need another player

James stop getting involved in stuff that has no concern of yours. You don't need to post it either as i would never punish something that was mutually agreed on...

both teams have the other 15 games completed and still nearly a week to go so whether the game is played or not won't actually make a difference.

You could presume jason did leave because he was losing as he made no mention of why he left when he returned and didn't post anything here which suggests the above. If there was an emergency or connection failure i'm sure this would've been mentioned by now

Id like to say, iu was put in a position last season when I should have left a game, out of respect to the opponent I stopped in it out of respect to my opponent, when I read his summary I were v disappointed, as id only stopped in for him, id gone from being chatty to not saying owt, and taking 15 secs and thinkin about game to takin 1 sec and whacking, he thought hed changed the game round, think I were 5 1 up b4 I should have left, its hard to put a rule on these circumstances, I think ash makes avalid point in the 2 strike system,its not something that could be put down to discretion , which is a shame cos that's what is needed

It's not an issue at all having 2 semi active players when we're a really active clan, as we can make subs and have 6 eager people wanting to sub in at any one time. Slimey has never let us down, and messaged on the thread when he'll be away. The issue here is that we can't make a sub, and the blame is entirely on the other player.

He was offline few days yes ..My point is he has been online active .Yes i do think rule needs to be changed to stop all for having this happening ..

Im just posting an opinion, nothing wrong with it. If you choose not to read or act on it then thats your call.

I'm happy you sharing your opinion, as long as you don't start a discussion and leave halfway through!

Works both ways faust in every clan ..

Its an online game there can not be rules for every single little thing... find this funny coming from a player and vice who sat and spoke to an FBL Runner and questioned her about non month old accounts playing in the Pre Season asking if she was sure, she is the head of that league of course she is sure

I think its annoying to that we can not sub Stu but as you said was down to them not us.

Yeah Jason has been on since, so was Scope in that 3 - 4 day period that Jason was offline. Works both ways you know and i will speak to Jason (possibly not take any action at all as it is Pre Season)

Both teams are through but if those two do end up playing then great Jason has never gave a reason for leaving either i don't think so i have to assume it was an important matter he had to attend to or he just left simple as.

Your player was getting beat, your player left the game. You get the picture yet ang3l? It all involves what your player did so how you get "it works both ways" is beyond me when it was your player at fault.