FCL League Discussion Thread (3)

Viewing forum thread.
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.

Pages: 15556
57
5859100
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
23:53 Wed 27 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
I am not in charge of the default panel I am just giving facts
bluenose1872
bluenose1872
Posts: 22,512
23:53 Wed 27 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
Thank you for your time in the league.

Just so everyone is aware i have far more pressing matters to deal with in personal life than to apparently ruin a clan or whatever you want to call it, this is an online game not life and death as some people have previously stated.

Sinners team and things will be removed either tonight or tomorrow when i have the chance to do so.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
23:56 Wed 27 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
Thank you for your time in the league.

Just so everyone is aware i have far more pressing matters to deal with in personal life than to apparently ruin a clan or whatever you want to call it, this is an online game not life and death as some people have previously stated.

Sinners team and things will be removed either tonight or tomorrow when i have the chance to do so.
make it quick I love the fact my biggest defeat in a long time doesn't count woohoo
the__priest
the__priest
Posts: 7,974
00:18 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  


Edited at 22:58 Wed 27/02/13 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
00:19 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
Thank you for your time in the league.

Just so everyone is aware i have far more pressing matters to deal with in personal life than to apparently ruin a clan or whatever you want to call it, this is an online game not life and death as some people have previously stated.

Sinners team and things will be removed either tonight or tomorrow when i have the chance to do so.
Avoiding answering questions again , or ' is the matter closed and you will ignore further questions' as per norm. . Thankyou to Jema for answering one of my questions
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
00:24 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
No problem Sarah

I do have to stick up for the husband a bit on this one, he did not have any influence over the actual default result he just locked it based on what the other 7 or 8 people predicted - he literally posts all the information given to him and leaves the panel to it.
bluenose1872
bluenose1872
Posts: 22,512
00:26 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
I have no reason to avoid anything, you and your co-captain think i have been biased all along, nothing i want to do or say will change that in the slightest just like when you both had your own league and you got accused of it constantly, it is not nice.

I had no say in the defaults and i will never have a say. I don't feel the need to explain much to someone over the internet either. I'm not falling into some argument over something that no one will ever agree on plain and simple.


You have left the league so your posts here are really nothing to do with me, you don't play here so either take it somewhere else or be ignored for the reason given.

You have left the league, your choice not mine. I thanked you for your time, now i won't respond because this is becoming child like.
the__priest
the__priest
Posts: 7,974
00:28 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
he told me my info was to be ignored jema

how could he tell me that, if he had no influence, his words not mine

so the question was who directed the panel to ignore the info supplied

scooby could hardly post messages

on top of this we made a sub, that had to count as effort no matter what


no digging at you, but these are facts
out of your husbands own mouth
horse10000
horse10000
Moderator
Posts: 9,926
00:29 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
horse for the record

scooby was offline for 7 days before the fixture started and 4 days into it

he came on line one morning at 3am till 5am

the next day i subbed a player out to play him

my player was leading 5-1 regardless of any reason and he had one

scooby stayed on line 2 hours browsing 2 hours in game

never to reappear again and still not to date

_egotistical was on everyday waiting to finish

he played another FCL clan game winning 8-7

this shows the complete disregard of jay in this league banning its_me for a none related clan matter

im crying over spilt milk, the league is a joke, and unreal the biased shown here, bordering cheating but to be fair, i posted ealier today we will the default easy, underneath i posted not a chance

how right was i

but to be fair uprising hasnt changed under the new captain

i thought i myself had been given a break by jay, not a chance
while im part of a clan in this league he will continue to attack them

so bloody petty

im out of FCL, and will remain so while stupid decisions are made like this, people wonder why there is trouble in clans, well lets be right its decisions like this that cause it

he knew with the attitude he shows what i would do, well done jay applause to you

great decision applause to you again

again i point out rule 7.4 your rule why is it there

friends and family


Am i right in saying the default went 6-5 to scooby. So 5 points for not being online, yet your player was online and got nothing?

And just by chance that default meant you lost the fixture.

i can fully understand why you are not happy.

Like i have posted previously i really am fascinated how they can get to that default score when there is clearly a rule that states the opposite.

Can league runners please offer clarification and hopefully this would be enough for sinners to reconsider and stay in the league as the posts above i hope are in anger and we should be doing everything to keep all teams in all of the leagues.

I for one would hate to see them leave as they are a great team full of great players that offer a true challenge to play.

The reason i would also like clarification as from the information provided and the rules of FCL, i would also be angry like sinners are if professionals were on the receiving end of the next default where it appears the rules have not been applied.
bluenose1872
bluenose1872
Posts: 22,512
00:29 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
"that would have excluded most information submitted by the Sinners captain as it was he who had made the effort and not the actual player."

That is what i said actually, i can still read the panel forum without posting anything. All information was posted!
the__priest
the__priest
Posts: 7,974
00:32 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
I have no reason to avoid anything, you and your co-captain think i have been biased all along, nothing i want to do or say will change that in the slightest just like when you both had your own league and you got accused of it constantly, it is not nice.

I had no say in the defaults and i will never have a say. I don't feel the need to explain much to someone over the internet either. I'm not falling into some argument over something that no one will ever agree on plain and simple.


You have left the league so your posts here are really nothing to do with me, you don't play here so either take it somewhere else or be ignored for the reason given.

You have left the league, your choice not mine. I thanked you for your time, now i won't respond because this is becoming child like.


how many yawns ago did we run fbl

explain why you havnt banned people out of uprising who new that shadows was playing not as one player in that clan but 2, and wanted to join chips and gravey on another

and dextr in the clan and banned, you took no action blatant cheating and i mean blatant and yet you choose to ban its_me for talking about jobs

hardly league stuff and cheating

and you no all about it, because you read the same posts
and then you decide to captain uprising aswell
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
00:34 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
I believe that all the information was correctly presented on the default and that is how I based my prediction - although I cannot confirm the score I gave as I will jeopardise my place on the panel - I can confirm my score was low and was not as ridiculous as 10 - 5 to scooby.

Like I said previously, the score reached was that of an average based on results from no to full points given hence the 6 to scooby which is roughly in the middle.
bluenose1872
bluenose1872
Posts: 22,512
00:34 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
No clarification needed, i had no influence in any of the default decisions. If the default panel wish to contact you and clarify that i never post unless i lock the default then they can do so in offline message, they can also show you that ALL of your information was posted.

I attack any clan you are in... funny that as i un-banned you not long ago, i i never liked you then i would not have done that. Next time you want to most complete rubbish please have your facts right and maybe a quote as to where i said something that i never said.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
00:35 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
"that would have excluded most information submitted by the Sinners captain as it was he who had made the effort and not the actual player."

That is what i said actually, i can still read the panel forum without posting anything. All information was posted!
Did your player send info in ????? weird how he hasnt been online since
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
00:36 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
Just for the record egotistical was not on every day I know so because I was looking out for him myself for our fixture with him.
the__priest
the__priest
Posts: 7,974
00:36 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
horse not a chance would we reconsider

bluenose put clearly on this thread all info i supplied was non admissable, i sent in 17 links and the usual eassay and rule 7.4 in bold and about the sub

i wouldnt push any further horse

this wouldnt happen ion TCL

we lost a default there i wasnt happy but it was fair
so applause to chris for getting it right even if i didnt like it
the__priest
the__priest
Posts: 7,974
00:37 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
Just for the record egotistical was not on every day I know so because I was looking out for him myself for our fixture with him.


after the fixture with scooby he was and i was told by jay not to asking about scooby i told him via offline and on the thread nearly everyday
bluenose1872
bluenose1872
Posts: 22,512
00:39 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
Now you are getting personal, ill have a word with clooneman about you and your despicable posts towards me, either leave this thread or i will do my best to have you removed from it.

I could care less of what you think of me or anyone i play for right now, and lets be clear here there was no cheating as the player in question never even played a game for the clan, just like that player never played a game for you clan when you had him signed knowing full well who he was (His messages proved that)

If you had shown ME the evidence of who that player was in the first place i would have banned him a lot quicker than i did, i can't ban people when i can not actually prove who it is!

This is very irritating and for someone who claims to be cleaning up this site you might want to look at yourself before accusing others.
the__priest
the__priest
Posts: 7,974
00:39 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
I believe that all the information was correctly presented on the default and that is how I based my prediction - although I cannot confirm the score I gave as I will jeopardise my place on the panel - I can confirm my score was low and was not as ridiculous as 10 - 5 to scooby.

Like I said previously, the score reached was that of an average based on results from no to full points given hence the 6 to scooby which is roughly in the middle.


jemma thankyou for that
but the question is this

scooby was not online at all

and we made a sub, so how did sinners not achieve a mark

just a question
the__priest
the__priest
Posts: 7,974
00:41 Thu 28 Feb 13 (GMT)  [Link]  
Now you are getting personal, ill have a word with clooneman about you and your despicable posts towards me, either leave this thread or i will do my best to have you removed from it.

I could care less of what you think of me or anyone i play for right now, and lets be clear here there was no cheating as the player in question never even played a game for the clan, just like that player never played a game for you clan when you had him signed knowing full well who he was (His messages proved that)

If you had shown ME the evidence of who that player was in the first place i would have banned him a lot quicker than i did, i can't ban people when i can not actually prove who it is!

This is very irritating and for someone who claims to be cleaning up this site you might want to look at yourself before accusing others.


so you say tweedweasle wasnt that player and you dont no it
Pages: 15556
57
5859100
Unable to post
Reason:You must log in before you can post

FCL League Discussion Thread (3)

Back to Top of this Page
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.