It's an online game, can't control what players say. It is worse in actual ranked games if you ask me, i got abused because i beat someone in two consecutive tournaments and all i said was good luck and good game and all that jazz.

People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones

Their only planting seeds!

Oh dear, tactical subs, if Alex ferguson is 2-1 up with ten mins to go is he going to get berated for bringing off a striker to out a defensive player on? Tactical subs are part of games in general.

For the record I don't tactical sub I trust all my players against any other player :-)

bluenose1872...

Just a quick query...

You know when doing fixtures, and I know it takes a while and you have other stuff to do etc, would it be possible to take a leaf out of your darling wife pixie_dust's book and put all the member tags etc at the bottom so everyone can copy and paste without too much hassle?

^^ Just a suggestion!

If i have the time i will do it next time, i was going to before but it does add on to the lack of time that i have.

I actually did that on Super League and TCL and noticed that more teams were removing the member tags when copying and pasting the games to their thread than actually using them so I stopped doing it.

I think that is because most of them don't usually tag their own players so they remove their player tags. I do it most of the time.

So i guess everyone agrees with leugue runners removing captains from teams without even speaking to captain to ask why and what problem just take there team away behind back real nice that is.

staffie_man

This is the FCL discussion thread.

1. I am the only league runner in this league so you mean league runner and not league runners. I will also state i am only admin for the FBL which Jema herself runs, so her decisions.

2. I already posted on the Viper page stating that i have not even looked at the "problem" for the FCL. So kindly go to teams on the FCL part of the website and you will see YOUR name their with (C) next to it.

defaults panel please answer this please

7.4 Aborted games
In the case where a player has to abort the game (for whatever reason), both players are equally expected to maintain efforts to get the remaining part of the game played by the deadline.

he was offline and still hasnt re appeared please explain your outcome

and i require an answer
the rule is clear he gets 5 points and wasnt and still isnt online

how when our player was online the whole time

8.5 Most important factor
Defaults are largely based on how much each player has contributed towards getting their game played.

From the predictions i read this was the main rule that was mentioned in the actual default, that would have excluded most information submitted by the Sinners captain as it was he who had made the effort and not the actual player.

In other parts off information which i submitted as i was there, scooby remained online for a further four hours that night while _ego browsed after leaving the game, he browsed for a good 1 - 2 hours with no reply to scooby's offline message. Everyone knew fine well that scooby had limited time to get game done due to being busy. Another factor would have been the information i submitted twice that quoted the__priest stating that _egotistical was unable to play due to personal reasons on two occasions.

The default team do not have to answer to anyone and they have more than three seasons behind them in clans. This is the answer that has been given.

I won't answer anymore questions relating to this subject as past times proved to get very personal from both ends and refuse to be involved in another matter like that.

and like ive said i would like an explanation from the default panel please,

we made a sub in this game aslo to accomodate your player

sorry excluded no matter, we made a sub

im not getting personal
your player even in your own words spent 4 hours and 9 online in the whole fixture

so where is your players messages to get the game played
you cant have because he was offline the whole of the fixture


explain this please

Everything that needed explained was in information submitted. Cheers.

dont tell me no effort

what you gunna do ban me again

default panels do need to explain how a team can make a sub, be leading 5-1 regardless if he leaves a game 7.4 is clear

both players

your player never ever came back on line
were is the effort explain it

Ahh well ,this is very deja vu. We actually thought after the treatment sinners recieved last season
within the league which was noticed by numerous people, maybe this season things might be a little different, we obviously got that wrong !
FCLs own rules :
7.4 Aborted games
In the case where a player has to abort the game (for whatever reason), both players are equally expected to maintain efforts
to get the remaining part of the game played by the deadline.

- Sinners player was online everyday of the fixture ready to play
- Uprising player has been offline since the game
8.5 Most important factor
Defaults are largely based on how much each player has contributed towards getting their game played.
- Sinners player being online daily, messages between captains trying to get game played
- Uprising player could not have made any effort to complete game as he hasnt been online since.
- messages from Uprising player could not have been submitted for the default because he hasnt been online since to submit them.

How the default panel have come up with a score of 0-5 to a player that was offline for pretty much 12 days of the fixture,
and offline since the game had been started.I would be very interested to know where the 5 points have appeared from.

Maybe its about time other players and captains start asking, which teams and how many from those teams are actually involved in defaults, as captains do have a right to know this, im sure they would agree, they would hate any biasm in the default panel
All credit to Jema this season in FBL for her default system,maybe FCL should take a leaf out of her book


Sinners had bad enough treatment last season , its now blatently obvious things havent changed , so i am now pulling them out of the FCL with immediate effect.

I am sorry to see that The Sinners have decided to pull out of the FCL and thank you for your kind words.

Without giving out names, I believe that the default panel are made up of 1 underdog, 2 snooker squad, 2 vipers, 1 uprising and 2 impartial people (not in clans).

Jay has no say in the actual default, he just locks the result based on majority or average vote.

All I can say is that this was an average score, based on a very varied set of predictions ranging from no to full points awarded.

What a total joke this time from the default panel or whoever came up with that unbelievable decision.....

I really thought this season was going to be different and had looked forward to it

How can black be white when defaults are decided, I don't expect an answer..

I'm off to play twister with the kids now .....

2 teams with 2 players and some teams with no players not sure how that can be fair at least previously each team had one player on the panel

Also i am fascinated how if what sinners are stating above is fact and the rules are as above how you can award the points to the inactive player, i am sure i am not the only player who would like an explanation as i am sure there is one and we are all missing how they have came to award as they have.