nps could you answer my flaw question

You want me to answer something that has actually never happened in the FCL league before. I can not answer that as it has never happened and until it does i don't know how i would deal with it.

i wouldve offline messaged but i cant

Tables

can some one please check the tables, the scores are wrong,, ive seen at the moment
UPs have to many points

we have 18 short no matter how i work it out i cant see how the figures have been worked out, to find how the mistake was made

Fixture set 2

same as FBL but i will post there to

If you're on about that on uprising thread I think that might be the one Lee did, you could always do one yourself!!

its on the site, and i have thanks, hence i found the errors

No probs then maybe it's yours that's wrong lol. I don't pay attention to the site I just thought you were going off the one Lee made himself!!

i would hardly mention it if i was wrong, god forbid
i go off sinners website,

anyways leave it to league runners to sort
best way

Just did the tables myself:

FCL:
- Uprising should be on 328 points, not 346. They won their fixtures with 84, 78, 64, 62 points (=288) plus the 40 bonus points equals 328.

- Sinners should be on 336 points, not 318. They scored 78, 102, 54, 72 points (= 306) plus 30 bonus points equals 336.

The rest are fine.

FBL:
The table only includes fixture 1 and 2 (the first set) and it says there were no defaults in those fixtures (none are marked in red). I'm also assuming that you get 6 bonus for a fixture win and 6 bonus for completing all games.
If that's the case, then the bonuses for all teams are wrong. Everyone should have 6 points more.

Other than that, the FBL table is fine.

I'm also pretty sure that the runners have understandably been a bit busy these last few days, so the table will be updated when they have a bit more time on their hands. The results are there for everyone to see anyways, so it's not like there's any urgency.

seb, pros dont want any extra points theres are already on they only played one game

no one said it was urgent,,, i just pointed it out because its wrong, people can sort it when they want.

As Seb said we have been busy. The mistakes are due to the slow and idiot of a laptop with loading tables. We will be moving the tables to the desktop when we are back at home and all mistakes will be sorted.

Personally I think mouses should have more points... theres no error just think people should give us more points ;)

So people are aware Inpossibles team will be looked at and a decision made on what to do about them as a whole. They are losing players quite fast and most of ones left are ineligible for a while, they also have no one eligible to captain unless 0utlaw takes on the roll. I will have a better look tomorrow or friday.

Your thoughts on this situation are welcomed as long as there is no snide remarks directed to the team and players, this is a discussion that I dont need to tell you about so be nice.

its tough but they realli dont have a stable captain even vice captains to get games done and very soon may not have players to complete the fixtures soo its realli a case of can the get sum1 in to draft players in and stick with it at this time id have to say noo they must of had 2 -3 vice captains leave the team so dont see how it can be run

agree with beth, if they can find a captain whos willing to take over, also sign some eligible players for next fixtures then maybe it could survive, however lots of players has left at such short notice and thats deciding factor on how clans fold.

Feel the same here with a set and half to go for the season plus the xmas period approaching fast (players were inactive during normal times) i see set 5 being a disaster for them.

would it be possible to have this rule ammended on the website please as its unclear now and not needed

and all clans informed either on clan threads or clan news, as its a fundemental rule change.

of course the rules can always be changed at the league runners discretion, but im sure everyone should be informed, as a matter of courtessy



existing rule
9. NAMING IN CLANS

9.1 Naming
You cannot name anyone in another clan until end of the final fixture unless the clan Captain posts saying you can name the team.

Edited at 08:52 Thu 06/12/12 (GMT)

Lol no big deal really is it, seems like you're the only person that's bothered!!

I think funkypool rules need updating as well, it says that spamming is against the rules but it seems to be allowed now, so that needs changing as well, I guess that one is a lot more important!!

I think all clan captains gave permission to name players anyway other than yours so maybe this was just a genuine mistake!!

Edited at 10:00 Thu 06/12/12 (GMT)

don't see why you need that rule about naming in first place since wouldn't it be better to have it in open for captains to find early replacements?

Don't the clan captains know straight away anyway tho hence why people put TBA?

usually but you do get surprises