No problem with this post, its basically whats been happening over the last hour, Dan, people have explained to you over and over again and yet you keep the debate going, move on please, also if you carry on quoting dgen's post I will start removing them for spamming.

You better :-)

If none of your thing that is slanderous towards another member member i guess ya need to go look at the rules again

ACCEPTABLE LANGUAGE
Please do not use language that is threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.

Could be anyone of those

Oh right. Must have been the racially objectionable part then, because I used "white" as the color of the wall. I can edit it to green if you like?

geeze is this guy for real. how simple do u want it..

Well no one has actually explained where the confusion is from, they've just poorly repeated the rules without understanding where the confusion comes from.

Pre-season killer used the final 3 positions to determine the points, 3 for 1st 2 for 2nd 1 for 3rd. This was only a provisional scoring system and the actual scoring system implemented is different. It's about eliminating the other team. As soon as one of the 2 teams are all killed off the game ends. 3 players remaining scores 6-0, 2 remaining scores 5-1 and just 1 remaining scores 4-2.

No point making the explanation simpler when you aren't addressing the confusion, logic really. You're just stating the obvious.


To use Sebs analogy, like the room being painted purple the day before and not explaining that it was painted white in the night. You've not said because it was painted in the night, you've just said because its white because it's white.

Zak there has been no confusion about scoring until now, even now he understands the scoring he isn't confused as he isn't stupid at all he is just being pedantic .

Post removed by forum moderator

That should have been kept as default information mate (If game goes to default), posting it over the forum is not going to do any good now is it.

It's not going to default though mate. Mrmtp was asked for proof of such things happening and there it is. There's no naming and shaming; just another person's messages - draw your own conclusions.

If you have a problem with a moderating decision please use contact us and not the forums.

Edited by forum moderator ab_rfc, at 22:38 Sun 29/07/12 (BST)

Well technically you broke a forum rule? I think there is one that states that you can not post offline message things or something. Anyway keep it in case the game does go to default mate along with anything else you have.

I couldn't care about defaults mate. I play this game to actually play, not compete on posts for default info.

I didn't know about the rule about offline messages but all I was doing was proving that someone (nameless, so can't be naming and shaming) was lying.

Im not 100% on that rule mind you but i also think just posting the actual message and who it was to is classed as naming and shaming, unless Nick never really was clear on it if indeed it is a rule.

I'm not sure either but surely just posting the message shouldn't be naming and shaming unless the message itself is breaking the rules; in which case it is the lesser of 2 evils.

There aint a rule on posting offline messages ive just looked on the forum rules

http://www.funkypool.com/viewPostingRules.do

Also dont say anything bout naming and shaming, so why cant you name and shame we will never know i guess

there isn't a rule but posting screenshots to prove a point generally ends up being removed due to naming and shaming and also that one screenshot could lead to arguments thats why we don't like posting screenshots when it should be saved for defaults if it went that far

But it's not against the rules then?! It could solve an arguement because it is clear proof rather than the normal: "he said..." "she said..." rubbish we normally have.

its not often id agree with you dan

but its fairly typical really

there is a post on page 85 uprising thread from
uncle_bob which is down right disgusting and not for a family site, certainly not for any children to read
it has been reported to admin over a week ago and still not removed

if this is post is acceptable you are snow white

Can i just butt in again to say that i never said i did not agree with what you posted Badger, i honestly thought there was a funkypool rule that covered what you put. So why it was removed is beyond me but i honestly think it was due to the message having the persons name in it there for it may kind of make it naming and shaming.