how am i wrong matty

James as said (sorry for the 50th quote James)



So how the hell do you get 6 - 0 win?

To have a 6 - 0 win you have got to have 3 team mates in the final 3 right? Or am i missing something here?

It is a broken record, because what you're saying is wrong!

The 6-0 would not be awarded because the players place 1st, 2nd, and 3rd. The 6-0 would be awarded because 3 players were left at the point when the opposition was eliminated.
Practically it's the same thing, but the REASON is different. So dgen's statement is absolutely correct.

To win 6 - 0 you have got to have 3 players in the final 3 right?

So why is a league runner saying this

The very definition of a troll.

I've just explained it to you. You're using the wrong reason to award a 6-0. Nothing I can add to that.

We've all explained it in a way that jay's 0-year old kid could understand.

Seb, to win 6 - 0 you need 3 players in final 3 right? we agree on that surely?

Honestly, I've explained it to you. You're using the wrong reason to give a 6-0.

Seb: "The wall is white."
Dan: "Why is the wall white?"
Seb: "Because it's been painted white."
Dan: "But why is the wall white?"
Seb: "Because white paint was used."
Dan: "Why is the wall white?"

-_-

I aint using the wrong reason at all, all im doing is quoting a league runner that as said it dont go on the final 3

So to get a 6 - 0 win you have to have 3 players(from same team) in the final 3 right?

Then a league runner says it doesnt go on the final 3(dont wana quote him just incase it freezes his Pc as hes in game)

So if you are giving out 6 - 0 wins to team with players in the final 3, you also have to give 5 - 1 to teams that have 2 players in the final 3 and 4 - 2 for a team that wins with 1 player left in the final 3

Kinda contradicting if the rule only stands for the 6 - 0 win and not the rest

No it's just a system that is used and only you over both sites has a problem with this :-/

Why are you the only person struggling to understand how it works??

See, you've come to the wrong conclusion because you KEEP using the wrong reason to award the 6-0. I can't help you anymore I'm afraid. I've explained it in the simplest terms I know.

nah went in game as i didn't want to look on the forums as i didn't want to get anymore annoyed, when i get seriously annoyed i just like a few games on my own with no pms, sort of like my own way to try and calm down. just reading the continued discussion makes me feel annoyed so i need a time out.

Wonder what a mod would say about this post seb

Not sure, probably nothing. Is there a problem with it?

I mean, it's exactly what you've done over the last 45 minutes lol

Of course there is a problem with it, either edit ya post or i will have admin/mods to look into it

Oh ok, well I don't see the problem with it.
So feel free- there are enough mods around. Want to tell me what's wrong with it?

Okies then ill message the mods that moderate this section and also send the link to admin for them to look into

Wow how tedious, I can't see anything wrong with it and I'm a mod on snooker :-/.

lol, if it makes him happy he can go to the mods. But at least this even more tedious conversation about killer is now over. phew.

But why aint it a 6-0?