how are default points awarded btw?

Good question:

Any default score will be 0-0 unless there is clear evidence to show why a game was not played, which bearing in mind there are only five games to play during sixteen days, is going to be difficult to justify ordinarily.

when were clans asked about the evidences? it says we have the time to do that for 48 hours after deadlines passed.

6 games as 1 were the KILLER, that annoying game type lol. We didnt get to conclude the 8uk only - sending in default information for 4 points is silly, surely?

^ silly because they'd go against you

I'd think they would be important for points difference

Lol, doubt it, but i'm not going bother messing around over 4 measly little points. you have won the fixture anyways, will it make your team feel that little bit better with 4 extra points lol.

its not silly really, if those 4 points determined the winner im sure you wouldnt be saying that.

and im not asking about the default against you ash but defaults in general as i think its not fair giving 0-0 when someone may have tried to play the game.

Nemind 0 0, I came on twice to pre arranged games, with no shows, ive sent loads er m essages, theres info on pros thread aswell default faust has sent, ive been online 12 out of the 14 days.

I most certainly didn't play for default and would still like to play

No problem, I don't think 0-0 is adequate neither to be honest, both players made an effort to get this played, unfortunately my player failed to show on the Thursday as pre-arranged so 4 points on offer I'd be content with 1-3. I'm a fair person and feel this would be suitable.

what games this ash

unknownelite vs zante mate - were 5-3 partial - just 8uk to play.

How about most defaults be decided by the 2 captains, failure to agree then the League Runner has overall decision?

imagine trying to sort one out with seagulls, if paul weren't on ud have serious difficulties

I don't think that's a good idea, in blatant 0-0 cases both clans would benefit from it despite deserving nothing. I think the super league is ran the most professionally and that is how it's always been. Very strict on defaults, very clear on how things are run and produces very little in the way of defaults and arguments (There is no discussion thread, because there is no need for a discussion).

I think the above should really be in pm as this is a new thread

I totally agree 100%, the SL is run properly, efficiently and concisely, good understanding with all teams and their players.

I agree , but I surely should get some default points

Open to abuse imo take us v ubs both realistically fighting for the fourth spot in the group.
They were on 23 points in the game and would get the points needed for a bonus point in killer just by playing it, we could avoid it and do ourselves a favour in the group.
We never would and enough efforts were made by both teams to play the game on many occasions to warrant points.
Wouldn't like to see the group decided because of an unfair lack of 2 default points to them and you see how the system could be abused.

Week 2

There are two matches in Week 2, called the Preliminary Semi-finals.

Preliminary Semi-Final One

Highest ranked Qualifying Play-off Loser (1st, 2nd, or 3rd) v Lowest ranked Elimination Play-off Winner (6th, 7th or 8th)

Winners to Game Call Loser eliminated

Preliminary Semi-Final Two

Lowest ranked Qualifying Play-off Loser (2nd, 3rd or 4th) v Highest ranked Elimination Play-off Winner (5th, 6th or 7th)

Winners to Game Call Loser eliminated


How are these ranks worked out chris?

It will be based on your final place in your Group and then a direct comparison with the team finishing in the same position in the other Group.

For example the teams ranked 1st & 2nd will be the two Group Winners, of which the team ranked 1st will have finished with the better overall record of the two (as well as being winners of the League Leaders Shield). And so on for 3rd & 4th, 5th & 6th and 7th & 8th.