League Discussion Thread
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.
17:29 Wed 24 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
yeah on my about me.
i switched my yola one for his.
lot more fancy too.
i switched my yola one for his.
lot more fancy too.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:33 Wed 24 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
http://sites.google.com/site/funkypoolclanleague/home
On the tables page there is tables updated to Fixture Set 2, fixture set 3 will appear on there once the defaults are decided.
On the results page you can scroll to the right and view slightly more up-to-date ones but aren't 100% accurate because default scores have not been added
On the tables page there is tables updated to Fixture Set 2, fixture set 3 will appear on there once the defaults are decided.
On the results page you can scroll to the right and view slightly more up-to-date ones but aren't 100% accurate because default scores have not been added
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:43 Wed 24 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Cheers guys, definitely more fancy...swit swooo
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:55 Wed 24 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
I like either idea that will give more room to allow games to be played. Any time there is even 1 default it is 1 default too many IMO some teams can't play 2 sets of fixtures in the time so how can they play 3?
Good ideas James just now to see what everyone else thinks.
dgeneratio said:
couple ideas.
as cup has been pretty much cramped into these last 4 weeks cup may finish later than league.
what i propose is that we have cup semis for 1 week on its own then have final div 1 fixtures with cup final.
example...
fixture set - now
Cup Semi (1 week)
Cup Final/Div 1 Final Fixture (2 weeks)
using this example will cram defaults unless we do cup a day later
or have it like it is now, however instead of 1 week cup semi and final into final fixture end the season with a 2 week cup final (after div 1 fixtures is complete)
so for example:
fixture set (where we are now)
Cup Semi (1 week)
Final Fixtures (2 weeks)
Cup Final (2 weeks)
gives us time to do defaults also.
or can keep it as it is which is.
Div 2 Final Fixtures/ Cup Quarter/Semi (2 weeks)
Cup Final/Div 1 Fixtures (2 weeks)
bottom example seems a bit cramped
this is just an idea so if people dont agree it wont happen, interested to see what kevlar thinks also.
as cup has been pretty much cramped into these last 4 weeks cup may finish later than league.
what i propose is that we have cup semis for 1 week on its own then have final div 1 fixtures with cup final.
example...
fixture set - now
Cup Semi (1 week)
Cup Final/Div 1 Final Fixture (2 weeks)
using this example will cram defaults unless we do cup a day later
or have it like it is now, however instead of 1 week cup semi and final into final fixture end the season with a 2 week cup final (after div 1 fixtures is complete)
so for example:
fixture set (where we are now)
Cup Semi (1 week)
Final Fixtures (2 weeks)
Cup Final (2 weeks)
gives us time to do defaults also.
or can keep it as it is which is.
Div 2 Final Fixtures/ Cup Quarter/Semi (2 weeks)
Cup Final/Div 1 Fixtures (2 weeks)
bottom example seems a bit cramped
this is just an idea so if people dont agree it wont happen, interested to see what kevlar thinks also.
I like either idea that will give more room to allow games to be played. Any time there is even 1 default it is 1 default too many IMO some teams can't play 2 sets of fixtures in the time so how can they play 3?
Good ideas James just now to see what everyone else thinks.
00:15 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Heres a topic for discussion
Should league runners treat all clans the same ?
Seems one league runner is treating MVP different from all the others, surley that is very unfair of someone in their position to do. I won't name that person I would just like to say it is a captains decision whether they want to give permission or not for their players to be named now for clans they are joining for next season, but surely as a league runner they should be fair and if they give permission to one clan they should give to all, not just refuse point blank because they don't like that clan or the people running it, would be great if league runners would treat all clans the same.
Should league runners treat all clans the same ?
Seems one league runner is treating MVP different from all the others, surley that is very unfair of someone in their position to do. I won't name that person I would just like to say it is a captains decision whether they want to give permission or not for their players to be named now for clans they are joining for next season, but surely as a league runner they should be fair and if they give permission to one clan they should give to all, not just refuse point blank because they don't like that clan or the people running it, would be great if league runners would treat all clans the same.
00:19 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
I agree, it seems quite biased against MVP.
00:20 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
There is 2 league runners so most of us can guess who haha.
It is up to the captain at the end of that day if he/she does not want to give permission to a clan then he has the right not too.
Clans should be treated the same in my opinion though.
It is up to the captain at the end of that day if he/she does not want to give permission to a clan then he has the right not too.
Clans should be treated the same in my opinion though.
00:22 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
answer 1 - yes they should
but its down to kev if he wants player to be named, it sucks that kev didn't give MVP permission when he gave the other clans but at this moment in time i can't do much but captains shouldn't use personal vendettas against a single member.
its like UT is going to fold after this season so no point in waiting for permission.
unfortunately ab as much as i agree with you, if kev doesn't want you to name his players then i got to stick by that as nothing in rules to prevent him from doing this.
but its down to kev if he wants player to be named, it sucks that kev didn't give MVP permission when he gave the other clans but at this moment in time i can't do much but captains shouldn't use personal vendettas against a single member.
its like UT is going to fold after this season so no point in waiting for permission.
unfortunately ab as much as i agree with you, if kev doesn't want you to name his players then i got to stick by that as nothing in rules to prevent him from doing this.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:26 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
No not at all Alan, the captains that showed some respect and a little less arrogance got what they wanted. You could learn a lot from them. Trying to blackmail me however isn't going to go down well is it, so you expect me to do you favours?
My decision at the end of the day and I'll stick by it until the end of the season
My decision at the end of the day and I'll stick by it until the end of the season
00:34 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Surely a rule should be that when a captain says "I give permission to name my players" it should incorporate all clans. I think that is only fair ...
00:34 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
I am still interested to know what this blackmail is all about, if its to do with me asking about you naming someone well that was a simple question, not blackmail, and if i got my facts wrong about you doing that then I apologise, but I think as a captain when you make decissions you need to take into consideration your position as a league runner.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:40 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
You pm'ed me with threats about me having broken a rule last season and something about going to make it public, needless to say your claims were false and it turned out to be a desperate attempt to take a dig at me.
Being a league runner and a captain are 2 completely different things. It's my decision as a captain to not allow you to name my players because of the way your clan, in particular those in charge have behaved towards me.
Being a league runner and a captain are 2 completely different things. It's my decision as a captain to not allow you to name my players because of the way your clan, in particular those in charge have behaved towards me.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:43 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Why should I give a clan that has been arrogant and disrespectful towards me, captain of Cobras, the privilege of naming my players they have signed for their clan for next season. The other clans had either apologised for their actions or taken the matter on the chin like grown men so I've reciprocated the feeling towards them and giving them permission
the_diamond said:
Surely a rule should be that when a captain says "I give permission to name my players" it should incorporate all clans. I think that is only fair ...
Why should I give a clan that has been arrogant and disrespectful towards me, captain of Cobras, the privilege of naming my players they have signed for their clan for next season. The other clans had either apologised for their actions or taken the matter on the chin like grown men so I've reciprocated the feeling towards them and giving them permission
00:46 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
I pm'd you after I made the post and asked if you were going to answer so please don't accuse anyone of pm'ing you with threats when thats not how it was, and as I've already said about that post "if my facts were wrong then I apologise".
00:48 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
I agree here with Kev.
As captain of Cobra's it is up to him on if he allows permission on naming his players for next season or not.
Being a league runner has nothing to do with that, he does basically everything right when running the league along with dgeneratio and they both try there utter best for the league.
Two completely diffrent job's in my opinion, and Kev does whats right by the league and other teams even if Cobra are on the receiving end of it.
As captain of Cobra's it is up to him on if he allows permission on naming his players for next season or not.
Being a league runner has nothing to do with that, he does basically everything right when running the league along with dgeneratio and they both try there utter best for the league.
Two completely diffrent job's in my opinion, and Kev does whats right by the league and other teams even if Cobra are on the receiving end of it.
01:00 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Why should I give a clan that has been arrogant and disrespectful towards me, captain of Cobras, the privilege of naming my players they have signed for their clan for next season. The other clans had either apologised for their actions or taken the matter on the chin like grown men so I've reciprocated the feeling towards them and giving them permission
We would've quite happily apologised if we had done something wrong to get the warning, our issue was that we made a point of getting permission to name players after what happened to other clans then we got a warning, there was nothing in the rules stating the captain that gives permission needed to post it, If we had known it would've got posted, maybe you should've checked with that captain before dishing out warnings, we got a warning which still stands despite that captain confirming he gave permission.
Edited at 22:12 Thu 25/08/11 (BST)
kev04 said:
the_diamond said:
Surely a rule should be that when a captain says "I give permission to name my players" it should incorporate all clans. I think that is only fair ...
Why should I give a clan that has been arrogant and disrespectful towards me, captain of Cobras, the privilege of naming my players they have signed for their clan for next season. The other clans had either apologised for their actions or taken the matter on the chin like grown men so I've reciprocated the feeling towards them and giving them permission
We would've quite happily apologised if we had done something wrong to get the warning, our issue was that we made a point of getting permission to name players after what happened to other clans then we got a warning, there was nothing in the rules stating the captain that gives permission needed to post it, If we had known it would've got posted, maybe you should've checked with that captain before dishing out warnings, we got a warning which still stands despite that captain confirming he gave permission.
Edited at 22:12 Thu 25/08/11 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
01:10 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
But kev has given all the other clans that contain cobras players in them and allowed them all to announce players bar MVP...
if that is the case then i will just quit cobras here and now. so i can be announced in a clan i want, coz in my opinion breaking rules they did get a warning.....
but thaat was a warning the didnt break it again, and the warning doesnt say that they are not allowed permission from the other teams captains from that point on does it...
it would be nice for kev to agree so that mvp players could have some friendlies and a few inside competitions.
if that is the case then i will just quit cobras here and now. so i can be announced in a clan i want, coz in my opinion breaking rules they did get a warning.....
but thaat was a warning the didnt break it again, and the warning doesnt say that they are not allowed permission from the other teams captains from that point on does it...
it would be nice for kev to agree so that mvp players could have some friendlies and a few inside competitions.
01:10 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Why should I give a clan that has been arrogant and disrespectful towards me, captain of Cobras, the privilege of naming my players they have signed for their clan for next season. The other clans had either apologised for their actions or taken the matter on the chin like grown men so I've reciprocated the feeling towards them and giving them permission
In all honesty, i dont know your situation with other clans mate, and frankly it's irrelevant, what i'm saying is that should be the rule^, so that this sort of thing cant happen. Simples
kev04 said:
the_diamond said:
Surely a rule should be that when a captain says "I give permission to name my players" it should incorporate all clans. I think that is only fair ...
Why should I give a clan that has been arrogant and disrespectful towards me, captain of Cobras, the privilege of naming my players they have signed for their clan for next season. The other clans had either apologised for their actions or taken the matter on the chin like grown men so I've reciprocated the feeling towards them and giving them permission
In all honesty, i dont know your situation with other clans mate, and frankly it's irrelevant, what i'm saying is that should be the rule^, so that this sort of thing cant happen. Simples
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
01:16 Fri 26 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Firstly the rule doesn't even give clans permission to name players period. We've given clans that get permission from other captains the luxury to name players. No where could we see anything from antione that entitled you to name his players, you just want ahead and did it.
Anyone can go back afterwards and say 'oh yea mate give us permission to name so and so'. How are we to know any if you did that or not, we don't have the powers to go through and check people's messages so we have to take it as we see it.
Anyone can go back afterwards and say 'oh yea mate give us permission to name so and so'. How are we to know any if you did that or not, we don't have the powers to go through and check people's messages so we have to take it as we see it.
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
League Discussion Thread
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.