League Discussion Thread
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.
01:36 Sun 21 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
totally agree with ipotalot
I think if your registered for a clan you can only play for that clan unless your released by your captain.
I think if your registered for a clan you can only play for that clan unless your released by your captain.
07:59 Sun 21 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Course you do cos you're going to be in the newly founded blue square tampax division 3 league along with MVP, the snookerers and TFS where 1 team gets promoted each season
Please stop bringing up the tampax league
i agree with jimmy! one big league, makes things simpler!!
ipotalot said:
jimmy_efc_ said:
Can't we just have one massive league? A bit like the Premier League in football?
More games for everyone then, makes it more competitive. I personally think it would be better
More games for everyone then, makes it more competitive. I personally think it would be better
Course you do cos you're going to be in the newly founded blue square tampax division 3 league along with MVP, the snookerers and TFS where 1 team gets promoted each season
Please stop bringing up the tampax league
i agree with jimmy! one big league, makes things simpler!!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
08:08 Sun 21 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Course you do cos you're going to be in the newly founded blue square tampax division 3 league along with MVP, the snookerers and TFS where 1 team gets promoted each season
Please stop bringing up the tampax league
i agree with jimmy! one big league, makes things simpler!!
Why sticky subject?
We need promotion and relegation to keep things interesting and the gulf in quality with some of the clans would mean the smaller sides folding.
The numbers weren't great this season for 2 divisions but they will be up to at least 7 teams per league next time which will be great.
the_diamond said:
ipotalot said:
jimmy_efc_ said:
Can't we just have one massive league? A bit like the Premier League in football?
More games for everyone then, makes it more competitive. I personally think it would be better
More games for everyone then, makes it more competitive. I personally think it would be better
Course you do cos you're going to be in the newly founded blue square tampax division 3 league along with MVP, the snookerers and TFS where 1 team gets promoted each season
Please stop bringing up the tampax league
i agree with jimmy! one big league, makes things simpler!!
Why sticky subject?
We need promotion and relegation to keep things interesting and the gulf in quality with some of the clans would mean the smaller sides folding.
The numbers weren't great this season for 2 divisions but they will be up to at least 7 teams per league next time which will be great.
11:33 Sun 21 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
one big league teams will loose interest
new teams with inexperienced players getting hammered every week ,,, nd i have heard the cliche playing against better players only makes u better well maybe, but getting hammered every week is a fact
thought we had this convo before now
new teams with inexperienced players getting hammered every week ,,, nd i have heard the cliche playing against better players only makes u better well maybe, but getting hammered every week is a fact
thought we had this convo before now
13:06 Sun 21 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
correct we have, this thread is mainly for ideas and concerns about the league. if its popular it may be implemented, if not then it won't.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:45 Sun 21 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
i agree...but i dont see why a new team cant go straight into div 1 ...because at time its a gimmie that some clans will easilt win the league
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:58 Sun 21 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Why should a new clan go straight into the first division? Everybody has to earn that
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:42 Tue 23 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Quiery....
why a clan can be run by a captain with no experience if they become captain mid season?
Surely this is leaving the option open for people deliberately leaving to let inexperienced players take the reigns?
why a clan can be run by a captain with no experience if they become captain mid season?
Surely this is leaving the option open for people deliberately leaving to let inexperienced players take the reigns?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:05 Tue 23 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Interesting point that one, nobody wants to see clans folding all the time especially if they are fulfilling their fixtures but they shouldn't be allowed to continue indefinitely without someone with experience as captain.
If it's a good bunch of people that have genuinely been dropped in it then i'm sure everyone would help them find someone.
_aphr0dite_ said:
Quiery....
why a clan can be run by a captain with no experience if they become captain mid season?
Surely this is leaving the option open for people deliberately leaving to let inexperienced players take the reigns?
why a clan can be run by a captain with no experience if they become captain mid season?
Surely this is leaving the option open for people deliberately leaving to let inexperienced players take the reigns?
Interesting point that one, nobody wants to see clans folding all the time especially if they are fulfilling their fixtures but they shouldn't be allowed to continue indefinitely without someone with experience as captain.
If it's a good bunch of people that have genuinely been dropped in it then i'm sure everyone would help them find someone.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:07 Tue 23 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
There are members in the clan that have a seasons experience, I could see that maybe a "quick fix" might have been needed at the time however surely know this is just flaunting the rules?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:08 Tue 23 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Interesting point that one, nobody wants to see clans folding all the time especially if they are fulfilling their fixtures but they shouldn't be allowed to continue indefinitely without someone with experience as captain.
If it's a good bunch of people that have genuinely been dropped in it then i'm sure everyone would help them find someone.
Lee's pretty much answered your question there. Any captain is better than no captain when the previous captain ditches their clan mid-season.
ipotalot said:
_aphr0dite_ said:
Quiery....
why a clan can be run by a captain with no experience if they become captain mid season?
Surely this is leaving the option open for people deliberately leaving to let inexperienced players take the reigns?
why a clan can be run by a captain with no experience if they become captain mid season?
Surely this is leaving the option open for people deliberately leaving to let inexperienced players take the reigns?
Interesting point that one, nobody wants to see clans folding all the time especially if they are fulfilling their fixtures but they shouldn't be allowed to continue indefinitely without someone with experience as captain.
If it's a good bunch of people that have genuinely been dropped in it then i'm sure everyone would help them find someone.
Lee's pretty much answered your question there. Any captain is better than no captain when the previous captain ditches their clan mid-season.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:16 Tue 23 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
As we've had issues on this subject before though, with questions on wether captains are eligable or not. All I can see happening here that clans will look for "caretaker" captains until the season starts, then they leave when the fixtures have started allowing the before uneligable captain to take over.
I'm sure I'm not the only one to see this loop hole that has been exposed by a particular clan this season!
EDIT: Lee also pointed out this shouldn't be allowed for an indefinate time period, at the moment the clan have made no attempts to find an eligable captain.
I'm sure I'm not the only one to see this loop hole that has been exposed by a particular clan this season!
EDIT: Lee also pointed out this shouldn't be allowed for an indefinate time period, at the moment the clan have made no attempts to find an eligable captain.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:19 Tue 23 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
If you're talking about the one i'm thinking of that was settled with the ruling that previous accounts would be accepted towards eligibility or is it a different situation?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:20 Tue 23 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
I'm talking about a clan that in the current season has, as far as I know, a player who has never completed a clan season captaining it.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:27 Tue 23 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
There's 2 in the 2nd division but I don't think either were done intentionally as both clans just got dropped in it and they are still fulfilling fixtures.
Maybe one of them should have been pulled up at the time because it was handed on by the captain to someone with no experience when there was a clan full of people who had the experience but there's only a couple of fixtures left in the second and nobody wants to see clans fold.
Maybe one of them should have been pulled up at the time because it was handed on by the captain to someone with no experience when there was a clan full of people who had the experience but there's only a couple of fixtures left in the second and nobody wants to see clans fold.
17:09 Wed 24 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
couple ideas.
as cup has been pretty much cramped into these last 4 weeks cup may finish later than league.
what i propose is that we have cup semis for 1 week on its own then have final div 1 fixtures with cup final.
example...
fixture set - now
Cup Semi (1 week)
Cup Final/Div 1 Final Fixture (2 weeks)
using this example will cram defaults unless we do cup a day later
or have it like it is now, however instead of 1 week cup semi and final into final fixture end the season with a 2 week cup final (after div 1 fixtures is complete)
so for example:
fixture set (where we are now)
Cup Semi (1 week)
Final Fixtures (2 weeks)
Cup Final (2 weeks)
gives us time to do defaults also.
or can keep it as it is which is.
Div 2 Final Fixtures/ Cup Quarter/Semi (2 weeks)
Cup Final/Div 1 Fixtures (2 weeks)
bottom example seems a bit cramped
this is just an idea so if people dont agree it wont happen, interested to see what kevlar thinks also.
as cup has been pretty much cramped into these last 4 weeks cup may finish later than league.
what i propose is that we have cup semis for 1 week on its own then have final div 1 fixtures with cup final.
example...
fixture set - now
Cup Semi (1 week)
Cup Final/Div 1 Final Fixture (2 weeks)
using this example will cram defaults unless we do cup a day later
or have it like it is now, however instead of 1 week cup semi and final into final fixture end the season with a 2 week cup final (after div 1 fixtures is complete)
so for example:
fixture set (where we are now)
Cup Semi (1 week)
Final Fixtures (2 weeks)
Cup Final (2 weeks)
gives us time to do defaults also.
or can keep it as it is which is.
Div 2 Final Fixtures/ Cup Quarter/Semi (2 weeks)
Cup Final/Div 1 Fixtures (2 weeks)
bottom example seems a bit cramped
this is just an idea so if people dont agree it wont happen, interested to see what kevlar thinks also.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:25 Wed 24 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
Any news on when the tables are getting updated james? I know you're snowed under and have to do it manually too so not hassling (before everyone jumps down my gullet) just asking
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:28 Wed 24 Aug 11 (BST) [Link]
ooooo new site?
ooooo new site?
echo
echo
echo
ooooo new site?
echo
echo
echo
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
League Discussion Thread
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.