Dextr has deactivated so what is going on with the FBL?

It does say on his profile though that his account has an unvalidated email so that says he has used a new email to reactivate his account and needs to verify it now.

Hope he is back soon, not the same late nights if he aint

he will be if its an email change

That is what im thinking mate he better be or i will harass him

and ill spam his email

lmao god we are bullies

good bullies, we are his saviour

True

i can run the fbl for now?

defaults

(pythons) dvz (4) vs (2) ccfc1927 (SS)
(LL)fcb_1981 (4) vs (2) fired_up_cue (FE)

(UD) 0utlaw (3) vs (3) king8ball1(LL)
(TPA) jpenny3 (5) vs (1) skiller10 (TG)
(TPA)cue_control (2) vs (4) gunne1111 (TG)

How can it be humanley possible for latin legends to get the default.i had 2 players on all day and night toluca admitted he did not have a elgible sub.But yet he gets the default.Thx alot.Maybe next season we go FCL.And forget FBL.

mike you dont understand we have 5/6 people in the default staff so i went with the majority of the staff

To add:

its your word against theirs mike...This was decided by the default team after looking at the evidence from both parties

No need for explanations James. The decision has been made and it is final.

wahey dextr is back

Thanks mate

no probs man

Ya but he wont answer any pms.have no idea why.

Well it maybe final but definatley not right are fair to my players.

Wow, just read the comments from the ccfc vs dvz default. I'm not arguing against the score, but several people suggested that it was "a snooker player not too interested". "This is what happens when you need to play a dude from snooker" was another one.
I'm glad the members of the default team are so objective in their comments.

If I hadn't been out of town the last few days, I would have been able to submit the messages ccfc passed on to me (along with his explanation).

Result is roughly fair, but you'll get a heavy argument from me when I'm actually there to comment next week if crap like this is said again. Let's try to be neutral here yes?

yeah i cant argue with 4-2 to dvz as he was clearly more active of the two, but to say a player isn't interested without sufficient evidence is a little OTT.