That's where we disagree, the one winning the more game types, regardless by how much or how little, deserves the bonus in my opinion. In short, we should have a carrot, no matter how small, for winning each game type, not just playing for frames.

Anyway, we are making a lot of fuss over nothing - the current system works just fine, but I do feel it could be improved upon.

The scoring system at the moment is good, it allows for some very close games-which a points-based system wouldn't. But I do agree that something should be given for the game-type win, as it is at the moment you could win 6-4 due to four flukes in 9ball, which is perfectly liable, and that isn't much of a win.

If we were to implement a system whereby the winner of each game type was given a bonus point and nine ball was to best of 5, that scenario would end up giving an 8-4 winner-much more deserved.
The loss of one nine ball game also means that the scores are nicer numbers-with a maximum of 12 available rather than 11.

I like it the way it is now.

There is a thread for discussion on potential changes and so on, I'm kinda lazy in that I'd rather read all this sorta stuff there so I haven't actually read this thread yet.......chris is sure to be right though, whatever he said

well its I think the soccer system works best.

or maybe another way, to keep a losing person trying, is have bonus points for golden breaks, runouts and 7 ballings....say an extra 2 points for a stat on top of the standard point given for the frame already.

wrong thread