Ranking Tournaments
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:39 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
Just an idea, what do we think of creating Ranking Tournament games?
Could be done in the same way as there are tournament variations such as Marathon Tournaments and Speed Tournaments. Could there not be occasional Ranking Tournaments too?
Could be done in the same way as there are tournament variations such as Marathon Tournaments and Speed Tournaments. Could there not be occasional Ranking Tournaments too?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
08:53 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
there could be but its pointless what if you were 888 and were playing a 700 you wouldnt want to play them but if u win a tourney you could have like 10 points on that game :)
09:09 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
Ranking tournament games is something which has been suggested many times and something i strongly support.
I'd be delighted to see all tournaments ranked, but having a few each day would be a start
It would go some way to help make rankings more meaningful as an indication of ability and provide added incentive to play tournaments.
Edited at 14:10 Sun 30/03/08 (BST)
I'd be delighted to see all tournaments ranked, but having a few each day would be a start
It would go some way to help make rankings more meaningful as an indication of ability and provide added incentive to play tournaments.
Edited at 14:10 Sun 30/03/08 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
09:15 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
Reading this post Spinner, it would appear to me that you consider the current rankings as meaningless and agree that something, whether it be ranking tournaments or other, should be done to change them to a more meaningful system!! Sounds like the catalyst for change to me Ideas on a postcard .........
spinner said:
Ranking tournament games is something which has been suggested many times and something i strongly support.
I'd be delighted to see all tournaments ranked, but having a few each day would be a start
It would go some way to help make rankings more meaningful as an indication of ability and provide added incentive to play tournaments.
Edited at 14:10 Sun 30/03/08 (BST)
I'd be delighted to see all tournaments ranked, but having a few each day would be a start
It would go some way to help make rankings more meaningful as an indication of ability and provide added incentive to play tournaments.
Edited at 14:10 Sun 30/03/08 (BST)
Reading this post Spinner, it would appear to me that you consider the current rankings as meaningless and agree that something, whether it be ranking tournaments or other, should be done to change them to a more meaningful system!! Sounds like the catalyst for change to me Ideas on a postcard .........
10:19 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
That's your perogative lol
I for one think it's a good idea and wouldn't mind seeing ALL tournys made ranked.
It would even be a good idea to have a seeding system in the tourny draws, like e.g. tennis etc, where the highest seeded players end up on different halves of the game tree. What this would accomplish (apart from the obvious goal of preventing the finalist players meeting in round 1), would be to negate the desire some players have for sitting at an artificially low rank. I quite frankly don't care what, but *some* incentive should exist for all players to have as high rank as they can possibly manage at all times. As long as that is not the case, rankings will never have any real meaning.
Edited at 15:23 Sun 30/03/08 (BST)
9ballskill said:
im actually going to cry at this one
That's your perogative lol
I for one think it's a good idea and wouldn't mind seeing ALL tournys made ranked.
It would even be a good idea to have a seeding system in the tourny draws, like e.g. tennis etc, where the highest seeded players end up on different halves of the game tree. What this would accomplish (apart from the obvious goal of preventing the finalist players meeting in round 1), would be to negate the desire some players have for sitting at an artificially low rank. I quite frankly don't care what, but *some* incentive should exist for all players to have as high rank as they can possibly manage at all times. As long as that is not the case, rankings will never have any real meaning.
Edited at 15:23 Sun 30/03/08 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:32 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
i think ranked tourny's is bad as i get enjoyment out of playing them and also not worrying about losing points
12:38 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
I think we should have separate "tournament points"
This could work like normal ranking, except that these points can only be won and lost in tournaments...
This could work like normal ranking, except that these points can only be won and lost in tournaments...
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:42 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
NO I TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH THIS IDEA WOT HAPPENS IF YOU ONLY PLAY TOURNIES AND FRIENDLIES!!!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:06 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
9ballskill and macky3214, i agree that not all tournaments should be ranked, so if you want to play for fun or only play friendlies then you can still play in some/most tournaments
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
13:10 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
oh sorry didin't read that bit, yea i guess that would be cool
moody_602 said:
9ballskill and macky3214, i agree that not all tournaments should be ranked, so if you want to play for fun or only play friendlies then you can still play in some/most tournaments
oh sorry didin't read that bit, yea i guess that would be cool
15:18 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
That would be nice.
Make it non-resettable while you're at it.
sm_rat said:
I think we should have separate "tournament points"
This could work like normal ranking, except that these points can only be won and lost in tournaments...
This could work like normal ranking, except that these points can only be won and lost in tournaments...
That would be nice.
Make it non-resettable while you're at it.
15:20 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
This is a game. By its very definition, ALL you do here is just for fun - ranked or not. If people seriously feel they can't play ranked games and choose to play tournys to escape the pressure of losing points... well then you are taking this game a wee bit too seriously - IMHO.
moody_602 said:
9ballskill and macky3214, i agree that not all tournaments should be ranked, so if you want to play for fun or only play friendlies then you can still play in some/most tournaments
This is a game. By its very definition, ALL you do here is just for fun - ranked or not. If people seriously feel they can't play ranked games and choose to play tournys to escape the pressure of losing points... well then you are taking this game a wee bit too seriously - IMHO.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:49 Sun 30 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
haha you know what i mean though, some members only play friendlies, in fact some of the best players here don't play ranked games
janmb said:
This is a game. By its very definition, ALL you do here is just for fun - ranked or not. If people seriously feel they can't play ranked games and choose to play tournys to escape the pressure of losing points... well then you are taking this game a wee bit too seriously - IMHO.
haha you know what i mean though, some members only play friendlies, in fact some of the best players here don't play ranked games
16:09 Mon 31 Mar 08 (BST) [Link]
Definitely
I just wanted to point out that when people take rankings seriously enough to actually let it freak them out and let it be something to get worked up over.... it's time to sit back and take a few deep breaths, remembering it's just a game lol
Far too many people get their panties in a bunch when losing or having a bad day.
Nothing wrong with ambition, I can hardly deny having a fair share myself, but there's nothing preventing you from combining it with a healthy dose of "it's just a game" mentality anyway.
moody_602 said:
haha you know what i mean though, some members only play friendlies, in fact some of the best players here don't play ranked games
Definitely
I just wanted to point out that when people take rankings seriously enough to actually let it freak them out and let it be something to get worked up over.... it's time to sit back and take a few deep breaths, remembering it's just a game lol
Far too many people get their panties in a bunch when losing or having a bad day.
Nothing wrong with ambition, I can hardly deny having a fair share myself, but there's nothing preventing you from combining it with a healthy dose of "it's just a game" mentality anyway.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
19:27 Tue 8 Apr 08 (BST) [Link]
I dont think the tournements should be ranked each round u play. But i think that u should definately win some ranking points for winning the tournement!
Anyone agree?
Edited at 00:28 Wed 9/04/08 (BST)
Anyone agree?
Edited at 00:28 Wed 9/04/08 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:53 Wed 9 Apr 08 (BST) [Link]
look guys, this has been discussed a million and three times before (figure of speech )
from the past, the general concenus was that we wouldnt like it.....but now it seems that support is rising for it.
I wouldnt mind one or 2 per day....but how about only like half rank points. Because if you have it at full ranking, an 800 might play a 650 and the 650 may fluke a win or the 800 may be disconnected and he gains 10 points.....halve the ranking points I say and lets start at 2-3 tournaments per day for this
from the past, the general concenus was that we wouldnt like it.....but now it seems that support is rising for it.
I wouldnt mind one or 2 per day....but how about only like half rank points. Because if you have it at full ranking, an 800 might play a 650 and the 650 may fluke a win or the 800 may be disconnected and he gains 10 points.....halve the ranking points I say and lets start at 2-3 tournaments per day for this
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
09:50 Wed 9 Apr 08 (BST) [Link]
I wouldnt mind one or 2 per day....but how about only like half rank points. Because if you have it at full ranking, an 800 might play a 650 and the 650 may fluke a win or the 800 may be disconnected and he gains 10 points.....halve the ranking points I say and lets start at 2-3 tournaments per day for this
That was my thought.
I reckon something where you are awarded points on how far you get rather than who you beat, something like 10pts for tourney win, 5pts for tourney runner-up and 3pts for semi-finals is a good shout.
aflumpire said:
I wouldnt mind one or 2 per day....but how about only like half rank points. Because if you have it at full ranking, an 800 might play a 650 and the 650 may fluke a win or the 800 may be disconnected and he gains 10 points.....halve the ranking points I say and lets start at 2-3 tournaments per day for this
That was my thought.
I reckon something where you are awarded points on how far you get rather than who you beat, something like 10pts for tourney win, 5pts for tourney runner-up and 3pts for semi-finals is a good shout.
11:23 Wed 9 Apr 08 (BST) [Link]
You obviously would only adjust rank for the games you actually play (the ones you start anyway, getting disconnected mid-game should obviously cost rank, just like in normal ranked games)
aflumpire said:
Because if you have it at full ranking, an 800 might play a 650 and the 650 may fluke a win or the 800 may be disconnected and he gains 10 points.....
You obviously would only adjust rank for the games you actually play (the ones you start anyway, getting disconnected mid-game should obviously cost rank, just like in normal ranked games)
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Ranking Tournaments
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.