doubles championship
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
14:49 Sun 27 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
lol obviously a intermediate with a virt has more chance of winnin than two intermediates
14:51 Sun 27 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Which is more fair I believe...
Also, random pairings will cut out the arguments of whom goes with whom...
Also, random pairings will cut out the arguments of whom goes with whom...
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:12 Sun 27 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
if we had random pairings and some body had to play with a newbie for eg would they just think sod it and not bother carrying on with the tourny!i can see this being widespread with a lot of disappointed ppl who have been dq because someone did not want to pair up with them.personnaly i think doubles is a great idea it does not sound very straight forward to implement.
18:43 Sun 27 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
much better to just pick a partner than have them randomly assigned IMO
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
11:24 Mon 28 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Not so much for the little players though Mike...
We'd only end up with say Smithbit and Cityfan as partners, or something along those lines. Not much fun in it for the smaller players if people get to pick their partner.
Imo ofcourse...
We'd only end up with say Smithbit and Cityfan as partners, or something along those lines. Not much fun in it for the smaller players if people get to pick their partner.
Imo ofcourse...
14:04 Mon 28 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
but as daveygee pointed out then lots of people wouldnt bother turnin up cos they would think whats the point.
I can see why players would want to play with better players but if the better players dont wanna do it then whats the point..
If you can choose your partners then nothing really changes does it. The intermediates would still be intermediate and the virtuosos would still be virtuoso
I can see why players would want to play with better players but if the better players dont wanna do it then whats the point..
If you can choose your partners then nothing really changes does it. The intermediates would still be intermediate and the virtuosos would still be virtuoso
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:12 Mon 28 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link] the tournies still get newbie entries and i do beleive they find it fun,am sure they would not find that if they have been dq,if you ask me it sounds like more of a challenge,i dont like the idea of newbies holding the title for winning a tourny because they had a virt as a partner,it would make my achievment of 1 tourny win not so great(i am proud of this 1 tourny lol)and ofcourse there is the issue of fake newbies!!!
lewis007 said:
Not so much for the little players though Mike...
We'd only end up with say Smithbit and Cityfan as partners, or something along those lines. Not much fun in it for the smaller players if people get to pick their partner.
Imo ofcourse...
We'd only end up with say Smithbit and Cityfan as partners, or something along those lines. Not much fun in it for the smaller players if people get to pick their partner.
Imo ofcourse...
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
04:20 Tue 29 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
i just dont think it would work.
what would happen if someones internet cut out or one of the players had to attend an emergency of some discription??
if one leaves, i imagine that both would be DQ...that why it should just be a single thing. Doubles isnt a bad idea but its the complications with it.
what would happen if someones internet cut out or one of the players had to attend an emergency of some discription??
if one leaves, i imagine that both would be DQ...that why it should just be a single thing. Doubles isnt a bad idea but its the complications with it.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
04:40 Tue 29 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Funnily enough the game doesn't revolve around the "better" players.
You only want to choose your partner so you end up with Gerry all the time or somebody else.
I think the general consensus is that everybody should be equal in a tournament and the only way that can happen is if you randomly get assigned a partner.
As SM_Rat pointed out, all the arguments it would 'cause with the better players pairing with the other better players, it takes the fun out of Funkypool for the majority of players.
madmiketyson said:
but as daveygee pointed out then lots of people wouldnt bother turnin up cos they would think whats the point.
I can see why players would want to play with better players but if the better players dont wanna do it then whats the point..
If you can choose your partners then nothing really changes does it. The intermediates would still be intermediate and the virtuosos would still be virtuoso
I can see why players would want to play with better players but if the better players dont wanna do it then whats the point..
If you can choose your partners then nothing really changes does it. The intermediates would still be intermediate and the virtuosos would still be virtuoso
Funnily enough the game doesn't revolve around the "better" players.
You only want to choose your partner so you end up with Gerry all the time or somebody else.
I think the general consensus is that everybody should be equal in a tournament and the only way that can happen is if you randomly get assigned a partner.
As SM_Rat pointed out, all the arguments it would 'cause with the better players pairing with the other better players, it takes the fun out of Funkypool for the majority of players.
06:48 Tue 29 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Funnily enough the game doesn't revolve around the "better" players.
You only want to choose your partner so you end up with Gerry all the time or somebody else.
I think the general consensus is that everybody should be equal in a tournament and the only way that can happen is if you randomly get assigned a partner.
As SM_Rat pointed out, all the arguments it would 'cause with the better players pairing with the other better players, it takes the fun out of Funkypool for the majority of players.
No the game doesnt revolve around the better players- but they are just as important as everybody else.
Everybody is completley missing my point here. If you assign people randomly then a lot of people will get DQD. For example davyb1 gets drawn with arcticspark in a uk doubles tourny.
He looks at his partners stats and decides they are nowhere near his level and whats worse they drew quick_pot and cityfan84.
He aint gonna turn up and arcticspark
lewis007 said:
Funnily enough the game doesn't revolve around the "better" players.
You only want to choose your partner so you end up with Gerry all the time or somebody else.
I think the general consensus is that everybody should be equal in a tournament and the only way that can happen is if you randomly get assigned a partner.
As SM_Rat pointed out, all the arguments it would 'cause with the better players pairing with the other better players, it takes the fun out of Funkypool for the majority of players.
No the game doesnt revolve around the better players- but they are just as important as everybody else.
Everybody is completley missing my point here. If you assign people randomly then a lot of people will get DQD. For example davyb1 gets drawn with arcticspark in a uk doubles tourny.
He looks at his partners stats and decides they are nowhere near his level and whats worse they drew quick_pot and cityfan84.
He aint gonna turn up and arcticspark
06:53 Tue 29 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
will get DQD thru no fault of their own.
If you can choose your partners, then nothing has changed and thats the way it should be.
So what if all the good players go together, not all of them will and some intermediates will get paired with professionals.
I think youd find the site got a lot friendlier if you could pick your partner, with people wanting to get in tight with people so they can do doubles.
I would rather play doubles with someone i get on with than someone who is amazing at the game.
Basic point being, if you are going to bring in doubles dont randomly assign partners all the time.
Maybe if there are say 4 doubles tournaments a day, there could be one with a random pairing for a lil spice but keep the main bit so you can choose who you want to play with.
Tournaments do not need devaluing for not so good players by just being a passenger on another tourny win for their random partner quick_pot
sorry if i contradicted myself there anywhere- i jus got up
If you can choose your partners, then nothing has changed and thats the way it should be.
So what if all the good players go together, not all of them will and some intermediates will get paired with professionals.
I think youd find the site got a lot friendlier if you could pick your partner, with people wanting to get in tight with people so they can do doubles.
I would rather play doubles with someone i get on with than someone who is amazing at the game.
Basic point being, if you are going to bring in doubles dont randomly assign partners all the time.
Maybe if there are say 4 doubles tournaments a day, there could be one with a random pairing for a lil spice but keep the main bit so you can choose who you want to play with.
Tournaments do not need devaluing for not so good players by just being a passenger on another tourny win for their random partner quick_pot
sorry if i contradicted myself there anywhere- i jus got up
07:54 Tue 29 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Funnily enough the game doesn't revolve around the "better" players.
You only want to choose your partner so you end up with Gerry all the time or somebody else.
I think the general consensus is that everybody should be equal in a tournament and the only way that can happen is if you randomly get assigned a partner.
As SM_Rat pointed out, all the arguments it would 'cause with the better players pairing with the other better players, it takes the fun out of Funkypool for the majority of players.
lewis007 said:
madmiketyson said:
but as daveygee pointed out then lots of people wouldnt bother turnin up cos they would think whats the point.
I can see why players would want to play with better players but if the better players dont wanna do it then whats the point..
If you can choose your partners then nothing really changes does it. The intermediates would still be intermediate and the virtuosos would still be virtuoso
I can see why players would want to play with better players but if the better players dont wanna do it then whats the point..
If you can choose your partners then nothing really changes does it. The intermediates would still be intermediate and the virtuosos would still be virtuoso
Funnily enough the game doesn't revolve around the "better" players.
You only want to choose your partner so you end up with Gerry all the time or somebody else.
I think the general consensus is that everybody should be equal in a tournament and the only way that can happen is if you randomly get assigned a partner.
As SM_Rat pointed out, all the arguments it would 'cause with the better players pairing with the other better players, it takes the fun out of Funkypool for the majority of players.
07:57 Tue 29 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
Majority of people dont play tornaments say 70 people average out of over 100,000 players right, so only minority will have "fun taken out"
Also you will know all the other partnerships when you sign up as you can see who has registered for the tourny!
Maybe a rule no same partner ship for more than 1 tourny a day? as i dont see them being a regular occurence
so for example mike & smithbit uk doubles mike and me us8 double mike and joe bloggs 9 ball etc
Edited at 14:00 Tue 29/01/08 (GMT)
Also you will know all the other partnerships when you sign up as you can see who has registered for the tourny!
Maybe a rule no same partner ship for more than 1 tourny a day? as i dont see them being a regular occurence
so for example mike & smithbit uk doubles mike and me us8 double mike and joe bloggs 9 ball etc
Edited at 14:00 Tue 29/01/08 (GMT)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:12 Tue 29 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
6 to one half a dozen to the other.
Nice to see what Spinner thinks on this.
Nice to see what Spinner thinks on this.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:29 Thu 31 Jan 08 (GMT) [Link]
doubles tourny would never work,but i cant see why not in freindlys!!how about this?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:22 Sun 3 Feb 08 (GMT) [Link]
may i ask where on earth this came from?
crazzymadman said:
This has been said a few times, and look at nicks up and coming list.
v1.55 - 2006 Q4
- weekly email newsletter
- user pictures
- improved tournament structure
v1.60 - 2006 Q4
- premium accounts
v1.65 - 2006 Q4
- official leagues
v1.70 - 2007 Q1
- team match (play for club, country, clan)
- doubles matches
- US pool, add lag
- funkysnooker, add missing rules
v1.80 - 2007 Q1
- career based game
- speed clear up
- trick shots
v1.55 - 2006 Q4
- weekly email newsletter
- user pictures
- improved tournament structure
v1.60 - 2006 Q4
- premium accounts
v1.65 - 2006 Q4
- official leagues
v1.70 - 2007 Q1
- team match (play for club, country, clan)
- doubles matches
- US pool, add lag
- funkysnooker, add missing rules
v1.80 - 2007 Q1
- career based game
- speed clear up
- trick shots
may i ask where on earth this came from?
10:44 Sun 3 Feb 08 (GMT) [Link]
Im sure it was on the announcements forum..
Cant see it anymore :S
Cant see it anymore :S
10:59 Sun 3 Feb 08 (GMT) [Link]
may i ask where on earth this came from?
It used to be on the left under ignore list saying premium account or sumfin like that 2 long ago lol cant remember!
damee said:
crazzymadman said:
This has been said a few times, and look at nicks up and coming list.
v1.55 - 2006 Q4
- weekly email newsletter
- user pictures
- improved tournament structure
v1.60 - 2006 Q4
- premium accounts
v1.65 - 2006 Q4
- official leagues
v1.70 - 2007 Q1
- team match (play for club, country, clan)
- doubles matches
- US pool, add lag
- funkysnooker, add missing rules
v1.80 - 2007 Q1
- career based game
- speed clear up
- trick shots
v1.55 - 2006 Q4
- weekly email newsletter
- user pictures
- improved tournament structure
v1.60 - 2006 Q4
- premium accounts
v1.65 - 2006 Q4
- official leagues
v1.70 - 2007 Q1
- team match (play for club, country, clan)
- doubles matches
- US pool, add lag
- funkysnooker, add missing rules
v1.80 - 2007 Q1
- career based game
- speed clear up
- trick shots
may i ask where on earth this came from?
It used to be on the left under ignore list saying premium account or sumfin like that 2 long ago lol cant remember!
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
doubles championship
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.