seperate rank system
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Pages: 1
2
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:32 Thu 12 Apr 07 (BST) [Link]
''Catching up'' would not be fair
spinner said:
The only problem i see, is people who may enter every tournament going, only win a couple of games each time, could end up with higher "tournament rank" than someone who can only get to play 2 or 3 a day, but wins regularly.
Clearly the 2nd player is the better one, so should have the highest rank.
The thing is, any ranking system which works for tournament games simply ends up being multiples of other stats.
That said, what about simply adding semi's and quarter finals to the existing table, thus making it easier to see exactly what a player has achieved;
Tournament Wins - 3
Semi finals reached - 15
Quarter finals reached - 45
Tournament Games won - 150
Clearly the 2nd player is the better one, so should have the highest rank.
The thing is, any ranking system which works for tournament games simply ends up being multiples of other stats.
That said, what about simply adding semi's and quarter finals to the existing table, thus making it easier to see exactly what a player has achieved;
Tournament Wins - 3
Semi finals reached - 15
Quarter finals reached - 45
Tournament Games won - 150
''Catching up'' would not be fair
11:44 Tue 17 Apr 07 (BST) [Link]
i think spinners idea is good. the original idea is good but as has already been said people who arent very good but play a lot would be higher ranked than someone who is good but works a lot and cant play as much. I like Spinners idea because i always get knocked out in the semis or the final and have nothing to show for sometimes an hour and a half of my time lol
Pages: 1
2
| Unable to post | |
|---|---|
| Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
seperate rank system
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.