In the old days, with the old points cap of 100. Tournaments where ranked. But it was easy to get to 100.00.. And people on 100 where winning them easily (hence lars once getting 102). Now, i think making a tournament winner have 5 points added to his name will be a good idea. Because at the moment, i see the trade off with playing a tournament is having 20 ranked games, and a tourny win (with being able to play 24 in a day) jsut doesn't mean anything to me as they are so easy to get.

What an excellent post! Cant believe no-one has explained it like that before, so yes that would be reasonoble.

I always wondered why tourneys stopped being ranked...

jesus spinner thats what everyone has been saying you idiot. all everyone has been sayng is you get some points for winning a tourny, end of. If you cant draw your own conclusions from what that means in the grand scheme of things then you need help.