lol tht was funi! but now its 16 -8 to Dott though iwud b ok if he wins this match it wud b his first final!

its all over for ronnie cmon on u dott =)

Wouldn't it be dotts second final?

nah m8 his 1st

would be his second he lost 18-8 to ronnie in 2004

nope he lost in the semi final to ronnie

hahaha wat did i say dott all the way

i can guarentee you it was the finalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Snooker_Championship_2004

well then the commentators got it wrong

Come on Graeme Dott.

P.S If you have trouble sleeping one night, watch Peter Ebdon play, 10 minutes and you'll be out cold.

oH yessssssss dott is the man the new champ

Paul that was his second final, he lost to ronnie in 2004, the score was 18-8

was 1 of the worst standards for a final ever! glad dott won in the end tho

cool dude
was 1 of the worst standards for a final ever! glad dott won in the end tho

how can u say that yes it was a bit extreme but the standerd of play was FANTASTIC to see ebdon come back from where he was was amazing cool_dude i dont know what match u were watchin but it wernt the right 1

ok i fought i was rubbish but nevermind

Worst standards? Just because 2 players who don't make big breaks got to the final doesn't make it crap. If you think tactical play is boring then you don't appreciate the game of snooker.