FBL discussion (2)
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Funky Billiards League.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:33 Thu 19 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
I was on about jimmy he left deactivated so Alan released him, that was the correct thing to do as its jimmy lol.
Yeh so i can kick ya head in
I was on about jimmy he left deactivated so Alan released him, that was the correct thing to do as its jimmy lol.
23:45 Thu 19 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
Can't really say that though as he deactivated and when he came back he had basically gone to UT so we had to release.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
23:55 Thu 19 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
FYI - I am not changing the main FBL schedule just because 2 clans pulled out leaving MVP and SS double BYE's in fixtures. It has nothing to do with the specific clans getting a break, it was just the way the schedule fell unfortunately.
But the cup is easy enough to push back a week though
But the cup is easy enough to push back a week though
00:01 Fri 20 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
The normal schedule is fine anyway as Alan and Seb knew about it when it happened, Seb may not remember but it was posted about. Both captains where happy enough.
00:51 Fri 20 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
thats sorted then, both teams happy
wanted to put an idea forward, its a long shot but something to promote attacking play but i was thinking a side competition of the following:
Straight Highest Run
US/9US/UK Runout/Golden Break (maybe 7 balling not sure yet)
Overall of the above (meaning all types excluding Straight).
its not like the super league where you get bonus points, you play matches as normal but if you get an announcement it goes into a table. if it doesn't work it can be scrapped easily without affecting FBL.
what your thoughts and i won't be offended if you don't like it
wanted to put an idea forward, its a long shot but something to promote attacking play but i was thinking a side competition of the following:
Straight Highest Run
US/9US/UK Runout/Golden Break (maybe 7 balling not sure yet)
Overall of the above (meaning all types excluding Straight).
its not like the super league where you get bonus points, you play matches as normal but if you get an announcement it goes into a table. if it doesn't work it can be scrapped easily without affecting FBL.
what your thoughts and i won't be offended if you don't like it
00:57 Fri 20 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
I personally don't like it mate but others may and if the majority do then so be it
01:02 Fri 20 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
Schedule- Leave it as it is. We have way too many games as it is, so a break is welcome.
-------------------
Cup Playoff- Are Team Angry really saying that MVP should have to stick someone in that will definitely not be here and therefore get a free point? Come on guys, earn the win on the table.
Whoever came up with this tiebreak format in Season 2 obviously didn't think it through. Surely, no system should cause an automatic win for one team. Let's use common sense and allow active players to be put in. This is one of those occasions where rules SHOULD be changed during the season to avoid sillyness. Always remember that rules are created for a purpose. And the purpose of this one is surely not to give an autowin to one side.
An as you know I'm not the greatest fan of MVP, especially recently. But this seems clear to me.
Edited at 22:07 Thu 19/07/12 (BST)
-------------------
Cup Playoff- Are Team Angry really saying that MVP should have to stick someone in that will definitely not be here and therefore get a free point? Come on guys, earn the win on the table.
Whoever came up with this tiebreak format in Season 2 obviously didn't think it through. Surely, no system should cause an automatic win for one team. Let's use common sense and allow active players to be put in. This is one of those occasions where rules SHOULD be changed during the season to avoid sillyness. Always remember that rules are created for a purpose. And the purpose of this one is surely not to give an autowin to one side.
An as you know I'm not the greatest fan of MVP, especially recently. But this seems clear to me.
Edited at 22:07 Thu 19/07/12 (BST)
01:06 Fri 20 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
With regards to MVP having 2 byes this set, we have no complaints we knew this was going to be the case.
As for this stuff regarding the cup and league runners applying common sense and getting abuse for it. It is laughable, matty has had more than enough reason to be anti MVP at the moment after recent events, yet he applied common sense, well done mate at least it shows you can split personal issues with running the league fairly for all teams that play.
Someone posted a while back that MVP were not bothered about cups, i can only speak for myself but i am happy if team angry would prefer to win points by not playing games to let them win as i can not be bothered with the crap anymore.
As for this stuff regarding the cup and league runners applying common sense and getting abuse for it. It is laughable, matty has had more than enough reason to be anti MVP at the moment after recent events, yet he applied common sense, well done mate at least it shows you can split personal issues with running the league fairly for all teams that play.
Someone posted a while back that MVP were not bothered about cups, i can only speak for myself but i am happy if team angry would prefer to win points by not playing games to let them win as i can not be bothered with the crap anymore.
01:11 Fri 20 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
I thought you was, i am sure ab even had a pic for you
But thanks for the support another player who agrees that games are better won by being played
Schedule- Leave it as it is. We have way too many games as it is, so a break is welcome.
-------------------
Cup Playoff- Are Team Angry really saying that MVP should have to stick someone in that will definitely not be here and therefore get a free point? Come on guys, earn the win on the table.
Whoever came up with this tiebreak format in Season 2 obviously didn't think it through. Surely, no system should cause an automatic win for one team. Let's use common sense and allow active players to be put in. This is one of those occasions where rules SHOULD be changed during the season to avoid sillyness. Always remember that rules are created for a purpose. And the purpose of this one is surely not to give an autowin to one side.
An as you know I'm not the greatest fan of MVP, especially recently. But this seems clear to me.
Edited at 22:07 Thu 19/07/12 (BST)
-------------------
Cup Playoff- Are Team Angry really saying that MVP should have to stick someone in that will definitely not be here and therefore get a free point? Come on guys, earn the win on the table.
Whoever came up with this tiebreak format in Season 2 obviously didn't think it through. Surely, no system should cause an automatic win for one team. Let's use common sense and allow active players to be put in. This is one of those occasions where rules SHOULD be changed during the season to avoid sillyness. Always remember that rules are created for a purpose. And the purpose of this one is surely not to give an autowin to one side.
An as you know I'm not the greatest fan of MVP, especially recently. But this seems clear to me.
Edited at 22:07 Thu 19/07/12 (BST)
I thought you was, i am sure ab even had a pic for you
But thanks for the support another player who agrees that games are better won by being played
01:11 Fri 20 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
Your our No1 Fan, have you still got this on your bedroom wall.
Schedule- Leave it as it is. We have way too many games as it is, so a break is welcome.
-------------------
Cup Playoff- Are Team Angry really saying that MVP should have to stick someone in that will definitely not be here and therefore get a free point? Come on guys, earn the win on the table.
Whoever came up with this tiebreak format in Season 2 obviously didn't think it through. Surely, no system should cause an automatic win for one team. Let's use common sense and allow active players to be put in. This is one of those occasions where rules SHOULD be changed during the season to avoid sillyness. Always remember that rules are created for a purpose. And the purpose of this one is surely not to give an autowin to one side.
An as you know I'm not the greatest fan of MVP, especially recently. But this seems clear to me.
Edited at 22:07 Thu 19/07/12 (BST)
-------------------
Cup Playoff- Are Team Angry really saying that MVP should have to stick someone in that will definitely not be here and therefore get a free point? Come on guys, earn the win on the table.
Whoever came up with this tiebreak format in Season 2 obviously didn't think it through. Surely, no system should cause an automatic win for one team. Let's use common sense and allow active players to be put in. This is one of those occasions where rules SHOULD be changed during the season to avoid sillyness. Always remember that rules are created for a purpose. And the purpose of this one is surely not to give an autowin to one side.
An as you know I'm not the greatest fan of MVP, especially recently. But this seems clear to me.
Edited at 22:07 Thu 19/07/12 (BST)
Your our No1 Fan, have you still got this on your bedroom wall.
01:19 Fri 20 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
If that was on my wall, I'd have to burn my house down.
01:54 Fri 20 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
First of all if you mean me abusing runners for applying common sense then your wrong
Secondly for the i dont know how manyieth time,,,,, its not about it being MVP or about anyone being biased..... its about changing rules
And thirdly i already said once that i agree with what Ab said.... wait for Man up to log in as that isnt breaking/changing rules..... i dont want to automatically win it either
With regards to MVP having 2 byes this set, we have no complaints we knew this was going to be the case.
As for this stuff regarding the cup and league runners applying common sense and getting abuse for it. It is laughable, matty has had more than enough reason to be anti MVP at the moment after recent events, yet he applied common sense, well done mate at least it shows you can split personal issues with running the league fairly for all teams that play.
Someone posted a while back that MVP were not bothered about cups, i can only speak for myself but i am happy if team angry would prefer to win points by not playing games to let them win as i can not be bothered with the crap anymore.
As for this stuff regarding the cup and league runners applying common sense and getting abuse for it. It is laughable, matty has had more than enough reason to be anti MVP at the moment after recent events, yet he applied common sense, well done mate at least it shows you can split personal issues with running the league fairly for all teams that play.
Someone posted a while back that MVP were not bothered about cups, i can only speak for myself but i am happy if team angry would prefer to win points by not playing games to let them win as i can not be bothered with the crap anymore.
First of all if you mean me abusing runners for applying common sense then your wrong
Secondly for the i dont know how manyieth time,,,,, its not about it being MVP or about anyone being biased..... its about changing rules
And thirdly i already said once that i agree with what Ab said.... wait for Man up to log in as that isnt breaking/changing rules..... i dont want to automatically win it either
01:56 Fri 20 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
I don't take what was said in past discussion as abuse, even though from Ang it may be fun
02:12 Fri 20 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
You clearly didn't get that last part Ang, wouldn't want to make it to obvious incase Jema took it all serious
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:16 Fri 20 Jul 12 (BST) [Link]
MVP now have an eligible player for the us8 game vs team angry as jimmy__1878 is still part of their fbl team.
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
FBL discussion (2)
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Funky Billiards League.
Back to Forum List.