wat other factors? even bluenose said there was nothin more i could do to get it played...

well wen people are clearly avoidin answerin me as to y it is wat it is..its clearly a joke, no1 will admit to ther predictions

like i said to jay, im deactivatin anyway so its not like im gonna even bother askin for a revote...id just like to know how i got 1 wen atleast 1 vote was 4...

Dgen is right but what the results that were given were quite clearly biased or wrong, so much so that the other team isnt even defending themselves because its blatant fiddling. They can cover it up by saying majority vote all they like, still doesnt stop the fact it's essentially cheating.

ur wrong...im implyin that 7-1 i clearly an unfair prediction from the FACT my opponent refused to play me 4 times in 30hrs and so on

and the FACT i trusted them to make a fair prediction regardless of if we got on...i dont know if lethal would, im assumin he wouldnt, even if it was aimed at me for a win

its clear some information was made up, and made up in such a fashion that it pointed out i was in the wrong...everythin that was said and done, i sent in....now if they even done the same, it would point at me to win, even one of there captains pleaded with my oppoent to play it as it would be "a MASSIVE default against us" << word for word

what i will say is LL sent in no pack of lies of any sort, the information they provided pretty much mirrored the information DF sent in.

i really do not think that the default panel can be considered biased.

it could be as simple as ant not being online the last few hours of deadline day, even though i know ant had his reasons for not being online... im not saying it is, it could just have been a factor.

defaults panel dont need to justify their decisions to me, i trust them and although the outcome is unfortunate for DF, i thought you guys would have had more spirit and determination to win the last fixture massively, not stomp your feet and give up.

do i really need to say infront of everyone y i couldnt get online after deadline to play this game...was only at 5 to 12 (5 mins before deadline) that he decided he wanted to play

i dont believe u for a second that it mirrored wat i sent in, cuz everythin would point to me bein the winner

Do you have offline messages to prove this stomping of feet you are referring too?

If it's not needed to be justified why do you keep posting about it? We get your view on the whole thing.

Ah right il bear in mind next time im on all week but not the last day it means im gonna get a default heavily against me cos that makes sense?

This is laughable lol

tell you what, i give up trying to reason with you. i was actually on DF's side, i tried to secure more points for you and put less points up for prediction before it went default, but forget it.

i never asked you to explain why you werent on, i know you had your reasons and if you choose not to believe me about the information then fine.

carry on chucking your toys out the pram, i cba anymore, default wont be changed regardless of what you say or who deactivates over it.

This implies any could be on 15 hours a day and his opponent online 2 hours a day ant having to do something deadline day for a couple of hours and he loses although being on more and trying more? There is 14 days to sort it it shouldn't be based on deadline day alone.

EXACTLY mich and kirk lol...be online all week...but dont u dear miss last few hrs fgs

Im not getting at you before you say but it's you throwng your toys out aswel. Im speaking from a neutral perspective. I don't really give a plop what happens but the signs are evident.

Runners have a right to get angry when they're being accused of being biased. In other situations, players/managers get sanctioned for calling referees or other officials biased.
You have a right to be angry about the decision, but that should be the end of it.

lets get this clear...i have always said default staff...never said league runners

so no1 is accusin runners of bein biased

thanks for that seb iv most likely be on this site the longest and been running clans for a very long time
weather i get on with people or not don't come into with me cause am a honest guy
i never hold anything on people dislike or like if anyone got a problem me doing the default let me no

You maybe weren't, the kirk guy was though.

There all biased, anyone who says they aren't are liars

proof?

There's no point. A statement like that merits no response.

Been on this site the longest?