League Discussion Thread...
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:37 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
^^^ the results clearly show how the wording was written on the poll - each option is different
diamond_jem said:
Below is the result from the poll, the League Runners have decided to go with the majority vote with a transfer limit of one transfer per player per season.
This is our final decision and the details of new rule will be released in full once it has undergone some fine tuning, so please bear with us.
Edited at 04:01 Tue 03/01/12 (GMT)
This is our final decision and the details of new rule will be released in full once it has undergone some fine tuning, so please bear with us.
Edited at 04:01 Tue 03/01/12 (GMT)
^^^ the results clearly show how the wording was written on the poll - each option is different
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:37 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Lee u are wasted here..
Apply to join BBC NEWS 24 and become the host of HARDTALK.
Apply to join BBC NEWS 24 and become the host of HARDTALK.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:38 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
If players are allowed to move once when released by captains the only difference between the new rules and last seasons rules would be that they couldn't move twice...nobody moves twice.
diamond_jem said:
I didnt change any wording?
This isnt about old rules, this is about a new rule that has been voted in using a poll at the request of league members.
The wording is absolutely fine, if it was that hard to understand then people should have asked what it meant or said something before.
And what is this moving twice in a season thing all about?
This isnt about old rules, this is about a new rule that has been voted in using a poll at the request of league members.
The wording is absolutely fine, if it was that hard to understand then people should have asked what it meant or said something before.
And what is this moving twice in a season thing all about?
If players are allowed to move once when released by captains the only difference between the new rules and last seasons rules would be that they couldn't move twice...nobody moves twice.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:41 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Is that not the way the options were worded then jem?No, that was me summarizing them.
Jesus lol you had me arguing all that because that's what I thought she'd written up as the options...cheers for that seb
whocares8x8 said:
ipotalot said:
whocares8x8 said:
I think they were separated enough.
1- Limited number of transfers (ex. 1 transfer per season) with captain's release
2- No transfers at all
3- Transfers during mid-season transfer window
4- Same as option 1, but no limit on transfers (still with captain's release)
5- Free transfers all season.
1- Limited number of transfers (ex. 1 transfer per season) with captain's release
2- No transfers at all
3- Transfers during mid-season transfer window
4- Same as option 1, but no limit on transfers (still with captain's release)
5- Free transfers all season.
Is that not the way the options were worded then jem?
Jesus lol you had me arguing all that because that's what I thought she'd written up as the options...cheers for that seb
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:41 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
As i said an appeal by the player to league runners if they are not being released by the captain.
07:41 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Yes, that option is very similar to last season.
Option 4 is exactly last season. Option 1 is last season with a limit of 1 transfer. (That's why I said that if anything, the two could be joined to give even a bigger advantage for that option).
Option 4 is exactly last season. Option 1 is last season with a limit of 1 transfer. (That's why I said that if anything, the two could be joined to give even a bigger advantage for that option).
which is still inferior to a transfer window
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:41 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Bad Idea - If players had free roam, they could take advantage and hop from one clan to another
Bad Idea - Banning anyone from moving leaves people stuck without clans should they have an "evil captain" or other circumstance in which they chose to leave... e.g. Snooker Squads player
Happy Medium - Giving people the chance to move one time would make them think before making any rash decisions on moving clans yet still give them a chance to escape tyrant captains or a clan they feel they just dont belong to
Bad Idea - Banning anyone from moving leaves people stuck without clans should they have an "evil captain" or other circumstance in which they chose to leave... e.g. Snooker Squads player
Happy Medium - Giving people the chance to move one time would make them think before making any rash decisions on moving clans yet still give them a chance to escape tyrant captains or a clan they feel they just dont belong to
07:42 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Whats the saying "Anything can happen". This rule also prevents what you are saying above Lee. Like i did say in an earlier post.
You saying we should scrap this rule now just because "nobody moves twice"?
ipotalot said:
nobody moves twice.
Whats the saying "Anything can happen". This rule also prevents what you are saying above Lee. Like i did say in an earlier post.
You saying we should scrap this rule now just because "nobody moves twice"?
07:42 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link] lol the original wording was posted with the screenshot of the results on the first or second page.
ipotalot said:
Jesus lol you had me arguing all that because that's what I thought she'd written up as the options...cheers for that seb
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:45 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link] lol the original wording was posted with the screenshot of the results on the first or second page.
Hence why I thought it had been changed when it was written up because you wrote it as though you were listing the actual poll writing.
whocares8x8 said:
ipotalot said:
Jesus lol you had me arguing all that because that's what I thought she'd written up as the options...cheers for that seb
Hence why I thought it had been changed when it was written up because you wrote it as though you were listing the actual poll writing.
07:48 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Fair enough, except you were arguing the wording even before I showed up tonight:
Those were before my summary of the options.
Anyway, problem solved I take it.
ipotalot said:
Not just saying this but look at the wording of the first one...do you honestly think that people thought that meant it was basically going back to how it was last season?
Option 4 was last seasons rules and 4/44 wanted that yet adding players can only move once changes that in the slightest?
Nobody ever moves twice in a season anyway so no difference lol
Option 4 was last seasons rules and 4/44 wanted that yet adding players can only move once changes that in the slightest?
Nobody ever moves twice in a season anyway so no difference lol
ipotalot said:
It says e.g one transfer per season doesn't sound like everyone is free to move as they please like the old rules jay otherwise more than 4 people would have actually voted for the old rules wouldn't they.
Those were before my summary of the options.
Anyway, problem solved I take it.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:51 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Whats the saying "Anything can happen". This rule also prevents what you are saying above Lee. Like i did say in an earlier post.
You saying we should scrap this rule now just because "nobody moves twice"?
Saying it's just the same as the old rules which caused nothing but constant arguments and a big divide in the league with the big name teams taking their pick of the other teams players, the teams trying to get somewhere and facing an un-winnable battle.
If that's the majority vote can't really argue but 2 and 3 are this season's rules with the only difference being a transfer window and got the exact same percentage as the 1st option.
bluenose1872 said:
ipotalot said:
nobody moves twice.
Whats the saying "Anything can happen". This rule also prevents what you are saying above Lee. Like i did say in an earlier post.
You saying we should scrap this rule now just because "nobody moves twice"?
Saying it's just the same as the old rules which caused nothing but constant arguments and a big divide in the league with the big name teams taking their pick of the other teams players, the teams trying to get somewhere and facing an un-winnable battle.
If that's the majority vote can't really argue but 2 and 3 are this season's rules with the only difference being a transfer window and got the exact same percentage as the 1st option.
07:55 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
A transfer window is actually more susceptible to players leaving, because the "captains permission" thing is removed. Meaning in the middle of the season, players can transfer if they want- no restriction.
So on a scale of how easy it is for players to move clans:
Option 3 (no transfers)
Option 1 (1 transfer per player with captain's permission only)
Option 4 (unlimited transfers with captain's permission only)
Option 2 (Anyone can transfer in the middle of the season- no permission needed)
Option 5 (free transfer for all anytime without permission)
So on a scale of how easy it is for players to move clans:
Option 3 (no transfers)
Option 1 (1 transfer per player with captain's permission only)
Option 4 (unlimited transfers with captain's permission only)
Option 2 (Anyone can transfer in the middle of the season- no permission needed)
Option 5 (free transfer for all anytime without permission)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
08:00 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
It still didn't sound right to start with and I don't think people would see it as the old rules with no real difference but yours made it even worse lol at least it had the word players in the one that was up there!
That mis-understanding solved though yeah
whocares8x8 said:
Fair enough, except you were arguing the wording even before I showed up tonight:
Those were before my summary of the options.
Anyway, problem solved I take it.
ipotalot said:
Not just saying this but look at the wording of the first one...do you honestly think that people thought that meant it was basically going back to how it was last season?
Option 4 was last seasons rules and 4/44 wanted that yet adding players can only move once changes that in the slightest?
Nobody ever moves twice in a season anyway so no difference lol
Option 4 was last seasons rules and 4/44 wanted that yet adding players can only move once changes that in the slightest?
Nobody ever moves twice in a season anyway so no difference lol
ipotalot said:
It says e.g one transfer per season doesn't sound like everyone is free to move as they please like the old rules jay otherwise more than 4 people would have actually voted for the old rules wouldn't they.
Those were before my summary of the options.
Anyway, problem solved I take it.
It still didn't sound right to start with and I don't think people would see it as the old rules with no real difference but yours made it even worse lol at least it had the word players in the one that was up there!
That mis-understanding solved though yeah
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
08:06 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
The captains permission thing is a joke really though seb because you are only allowed 15 in a clan so you have to release players to make sure you have enough active players for matches.
Plus you don't want to keep players who have been approached by bigger name teams and want to go but this season they haven't been approached or unsettled or if they have it's for next season and they are happily finishing off the season for their current clans.
Plus you don't want to keep players who have been approached by bigger name teams and want to go but this season they haven't been approached or unsettled or if they have it's for next season and they are happily finishing off the season for their current clans.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
08:20 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
I agree that Captains permission to leave is faulty in certain circumstances. I have had it done to me with obieeeee saying he was not able to play clan games no time for it etc...I released him then a week later he joined unbeatables. (He was being targeted by adam from the day he joined wolf pack) So some kind of ruling that a player leaves under similar circumstances should apply as it was a deceitful act from the player and should not be allowed in my opinion.
08:21 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link] Which is why a transfer window is better.
Captain's permission is adequate I think. If one of my best players wants to transfer to MVP, I probably wouldn't give permission. I would continue to play the player and tell him that he can move at the end of the season. Solved.
As long as the captain is not treating the player unfairly, there is no grounds to move to another clan. So the captain just has to stay strong and not give league runners a reason to invoke the "evil captain" exception.
ipotalot said:
The captains permission thing is a joke really though seb because you are only allowed 15 in a clan so you have to release players to make sure you have enough active players for matches.
Plus you don't want to keep players who have been approached by bigger name teams and want to go but this season they haven't been approached or unsettled or if they have it's for next season and they are happily finishing off the season for their current clans.
Plus you don't want to keep players who have been approached by bigger name teams and want to go but this season they haven't been approached or unsettled or if they have it's for next season and they are happily finishing off the season for their current clans.
Captain's permission is adequate I think. If one of my best players wants to transfer to MVP, I probably wouldn't give permission. I would continue to play the player and tell him that he can move at the end of the season. Solved.
As long as the captain is not treating the player unfairly, there is no grounds to move to another clan. So the captain just has to stay strong and not give league runners a reason to invoke the "evil captain" exception.
08:23 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Good scenario by white_noise there. But let's be honest, the reason we don't really want players moving is that it could lead to clans folding if loads do it at once.
The scenario above is usually limited to one player. You won't have 5 players telling you that they have no time and then running off to another clan.
The whole point of these rules is to make sure clans survive, not punish players for wanting to play for someone else.
The scenario above is usually limited to one player. You won't have 5 players telling you that they have no time and then running off to another clan.
The whole point of these rules is to make sure clans survive, not punish players for wanting to play for someone else.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
08:37 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
Thats exactly my thinking seb..We want the clans to stay alive but sometimes its better that some do not when being run badly. I had 2 players from my clan (a season ago) leave to make their own clans and from what i hear on the grapevine both are in jeopardy of folding. I dont want to see that happen but i did advise them that it is not as easy as it looked.
Sorry i have went off topic
Sorry i have went off topic
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
08:43 Tue 3 Jan 12 (GMT) [Link]
as im not that active guys and gals i think il leave clans for now sorry for this
Thought that was a better scenario the day before he joined you guys seb along with mattywellie and wales_lad in one week so yeah does happen with multiple people.
At the very least if you are going to go ahead with going back to the old rules(and i'm totally against it still) players shouldn't be able to play against their old clan in that season and they shouldn't be able to play a team more than twice which could happen whilst moving.
ant said:
as im not that active guys and gals i think il leave clans for now sorry for this
Thought that was a better scenario the day before he joined you guys seb along with mattywellie and wales_lad in one week so yeah does happen with multiple people.
At the very least if you are going to go ahead with going back to the old rules(and i'm totally against it still) players shouldn't be able to play against their old clan in that season and they shouldn't be able to play a team more than twice which could happen whilst moving.
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
League Discussion Thread...
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Funkypool Clan League Management.
Back to Forum List.