Reverse Time Holders 33
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Fun and Games.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
22:05 Mon 1 Nov 10 (GMT) [Link]
I'll help. The quicker I get awarded the win the better
23:28 Mon 1 Nov 10 (GMT) [Link]
At the bottom of page 32? No. Close though.
How the lead has changed
pot_the_lot 0 mins*
(warney7 1 min??)**
pot_the_lot 1 min***
warney7 1 min****
warney7 2 mins
warney7 3 mins
crazzymadman 11 mins
pot_the_lot 16 mins (page 2)
crazzymadman 43 mins (page 2/3)
cmurphy 8 hrs 8 mins (page 3)
pot_the_lot 12 hrs 55 secs (page 4)
melz 13 hrs 30 mins (page 35)
cmurphy 1 day 20 hrs 15 mins (page 37)*****
* 0 mins 43 secs
** 21 secs
*** 0 mins 56 secs
**** 1 min 17 secs
***** Site was down; also, time includes the extra hour due to the time change from BST to GMT
Honourable mention: crazzymadman 13 hrs 27 (page 37)
liam__scfc, top of page 33 said:
is that smurf in the lead
At the bottom of page 32? No. Close though.
How the lead has changed
pot_the_lot 0 mins*
(warney7 1 min??)**
pot_the_lot 1 min***
warney7 1 min****
warney7 2 mins
warney7 3 mins
crazzymadman 11 mins
pot_the_lot 16 mins (page 2)
crazzymadman 43 mins (page 2/3)
cmurphy 8 hrs 8 mins (page 3)
pot_the_lot 12 hrs 55 secs (page 4)
melz 13 hrs 30 mins (page 35)
cmurphy 1 day 20 hrs 15 mins (page 37)*****
* 0 mins 43 secs
** 21 secs
*** 0 mins 56 secs
**** 1 min 17 secs
***** Site was down; also, time includes the extra hour due to the time change from BST to GMT
Honourable mention: crazzymadman 13 hrs 27 (page 37)
23:35 Mon 1 Nov 10 (GMT) [Link]
Yay
Ive never won this pointless game
New rule from Nick. If the game goes down then any post dont count!
Ive never won this pointless game
New rule from Nick. If the game goes down then any post dont count!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
00:34 Tue 2 Nov 10 (GMT) [Link]
Think you'll find I'm winning. If Blinky can win under same circumstances then why shouldn't I?
01:04 Tue 2 Nov 10 (GMT) [Link]
And it was done before too. It was suggested as a rule change way back and no-one disagreed. And Nick's new rule is no such thing, sorry Crazzy
01:08 Tue 2 Nov 10 (GMT) [Link]
Cloone my friend, if all i have to worry is about RTH then id better jump now.... my nick comment was a joke and for sure cmurphy leads with 2 days!
No one post now for a few days and then we can ignore this!
No one post now for a few days and then we can ignore this!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
02:20 Tue 2 Nov 10 (GMT) [Link]
Why don't we bring in that rule on the next game then?
clooneman said:
And it was done before too. It was suggested as a rule change way back and no-one disagreed. And Nick's new rule is no such thing, sorry Crazzy
Why don't we bring in that rule on the next game then?
03:40 Tue 2 Nov 10 (GMT) [Link]
Personally I have no problems at all. If it were brought in, would it mean that the game is suspended between the start of the site being down and the time when it comes back up? E.g. if you post at 1 am and the site goes down from 3 am to 10 am and the next post is at 11 am, you have a time of 3 hours?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:15 Tue 2 Nov 10 (GMT) [Link]
Sounds good to me. Is it possible to tell exactly what time the site went down, or would it need to be rounded to the nearest hour?
Could be a bit tricky especially when the times are close together like they are on the first few pages.
clooneman said:
Personally I have no problems at all. If it were brought in, would it mean that the game is suspended between the start of the site being down and the time when it comes back up? E.g. if you post at 1 am and the site goes down from 3 am to 10 am and the next post is at 11 am, you have a time of 3 hours?
Sounds good to me. Is it possible to tell exactly what time the site went down, or would it need to be rounded to the nearest hour?
Could be a bit tricky especially when the times are close together like they are on the first few pages.
21:03 Tue 2 Nov 10 (GMT) [Link]
Sounds good to me. Is it possible to tell exactly what time the site went down, or would it need to be rounded to the nearest hour?
Could be a bit tricky especially when the times are close together like they are on the first few pages.
You could do a bit of guesswork with, eg, forum posts and results; for example, I think a tournament was cancelled in the middle of it. Finding that tournament and then finding the relevant results on participating members' results pages would do it. However implementing this now would involve retrospectively changing the rules (i.e. changing rules for earlier happenings in game 33 after they've happened). Don't think that would go down too well
cmurphy said:
clooneman said:
Personally I have no problems at all. If it were brought in, would it mean that the game is suspended between the start of the site being down and the time when it comes back up? E.g. if you post at 1 am and the site goes down from 3 am to 10 am and the next post is at 11 am, you have a time of 3 hours?
Sounds good to me. Is it possible to tell exactly what time the site went down, or would it need to be rounded to the nearest hour?
Could be a bit tricky especially when the times are close together like they are on the first few pages.
You could do a bit of guesswork with, eg, forum posts and results; for example, I think a tournament was cancelled in the middle of it. Finding that tournament and then finding the relevant results on participating members' results pages would do it. However implementing this now would involve retrospectively changing the rules (i.e. changing rules for earlier happenings in game 33 after they've happened). Don't think that would go down too well
| Unable to post | |
|---|---|
| Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
Reverse Time Holders 33
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Fun and Games.
Back to Forum List.