holding rank
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
16:23 Mon 20 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
Once you reach pro or virtuoso maybe you should hold that rank forever?
16:48 Mon 20 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
Yep, thats the challenge dude
Edited at 21:49 Mon 20/08/07 (BST)
Edited at 21:49 Mon 20/08/07 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:04 Mon 20 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
I want to get to virtuoso but if it drops straight back then I can't be *bothered*
Edited by forum moderator martin_blank, at 13:32 Tue 21/08/07 (BST)
Edited by forum moderator martin_blank, at 13:32 Tue 21/08/07 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:18 Mon 20 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
is there a chance to get pro/virtouso with playing ranked games ? because i just play tourneys, so was wondering will i be stuck on intermeidiate forever lmao
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:26 Mon 20 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
yep you'll be stuck forever because people are too scared to risk their holy ranking in tournaments where heaven forbid they may lose to a newbie.
17:44 Mon 20 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
Well, with enough demand there's no reason tournament games can't be ranked.
(and dont forget, those who play for rank dont mind losing to newbies, as they dont lose so much as losing to intermediates.. )
But seriously.
I understand what you mean, however the "tourney players" equivolent of what you ask for is like saying "if i win 10 tourneys a day, i want 10 tourney wins awarded to me everyday for the rest of time"
Dont forget, this is why the "highest achieved" stat was introduced, so you can blitz the ranked games, get to 999.9, and it will be there on your profile forever
Edited at 22:45 Mon 20/08/07 (BST)
(and dont forget, those who play for rank dont mind losing to newbies, as they dont lose so much as losing to intermediates.. )
But seriously.
I understand what you mean, however the "tourney players" equivolent of what you ask for is like saying "if i win 10 tourneys a day, i want 10 tourney wins awarded to me everyday for the rest of time"
Dont forget, this is why the "highest achieved" stat was introduced, so you can blitz the ranked games, get to 999.9, and it will be there on your profile forever
Edited at 22:45 Mon 20/08/07 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
17:50 Mon 20 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
rankings moving is fair enough whereas the title pro or virtuoso is status - once you've got there you don't suddenly become an intermediate player overnight!
"(and dont forget, those who play for rank dont mind losing to newbies, as they dont lose so much as losing to intermediates.. Smiley ) "
That's not the opinion whenever the topic of ranking tournament games crops up!
Edited at 23:06 Mon 20/08/07 (BST)
"(and dont forget, those who play for rank dont mind losing to newbies, as they dont lose so much as losing to intermediates.. Smiley ) "
That's not the opinion whenever the topic of ranking tournament games crops up!
Edited at 23:06 Mon 20/08/07 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:10 Mon 20 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
LOL. If the rank ( had to be careful spelling that) didn't go down automatically, I'm sure people would be over 1000 mark...
spinner said:
Yep, thats the challenge dude
Edited at 21:49 Mon 20/08/07 (BST)
Edited at 21:49 Mon 20/08/07 (BST)
LOL. If the rank ( had to be careful spelling that) didn't go down automatically, I'm sure people would be over 1000 mark...
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
20:32 Mon 20 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
why dont funkypool introduce a system so a tourney players status is determined by number of tourneys they win, i.e. 10 tourney wins on each version is intermeidiate, 20 on each is adept n so on, summit like that
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
04:06 Tue 21 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
I think the ranking system works really good as it is now!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:13 Tue 21 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
the ranking system can stay as it is, i just think there should be something for the tourney players, just because we dont play ranked doesnt mean we should stay at intermeidiate forever, if someone like quick_pot didnt play ranked yet had the amount of tourneys he has got, intermeidiate status would be a joke to him as he is one of best plaers on here..
08:13 Tue 21 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
One feels obliged to express a reminder to my fellow users that funkypool is just a game *succumbs to laughter of an audible nature*.
In fact, one finds it in the proper sense amusing when people become agitated because of their ranking points.
(No "text speak" on the queries forum)
Edited by forum moderator spinner, at 22:29 Tue 21/08/07 (BST)
In fact, one finds it in the proper sense amusing when people become agitated because of their ranking points.
(No "text speak" on the queries forum)
Edited by forum moderator spinner, at 22:29 Tue 21/08/07 (BST)
10:33 Tue 21 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
Daily rank deductions is a perfect system imo
People who care about having a high rank should have to defend it - not just sit back and enjoy it forever without having to work to maintain it.
It also prevents retired players from holding on to the top lists
People who care about having a high rank should have to defend it - not just sit back and enjoy it forever without having to work to maintain it.
It also prevents retired players from holding on to the top lists
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:06 Tue 21 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
Not with his win rate and tourny wins, look like a good profile to me!
_wolvesdude_ said:
the ranking system can stay as it is, i just think there should be something for the tourney players, just because we dont play ranked doesnt mean we should stay at intermeidiate forever, if someone like quick_pot didnt play ranked yet had the amount of tourneys he has got, intermeidiate status would be a joke to him as he is one of best plaers on here..
Not with his win rate and tourny wins, look like a good profile to me!
17:44 Tue 21 Aug 07 (BST) [Link]
That's not the opinion whenever the topic of ranking tournament games crops up!
Yes, thats true - however all those people are doing is showing their ignorance of how the ranking system actually works
This thread has gone a little off-topic.
myfriendfats wasn't suggesting that the rank POINTS should remain static, but that the STATUS of Professional or Virtuoso should remain.
There is a logic to this, since the player has been capable of that level.
However, those permanent statistics are there on the users profile, and doing this would cheapen the additional achievement of retaining the relevant status.
Edited at 22:45 Tue 21/08/07 (BST)
myfriendfats said:
spinner said:
and dont forget, those who play for rank dont mind losing to newbies, as they dont lose so much as losing to intermediates.. )
That's not the opinion whenever the topic of ranking tournament games crops up!
Yes, thats true - however all those people are doing is showing their ignorance of how the ranking system actually works
This thread has gone a little off-topic.
myfriendfats wasn't suggesting that the rank POINTS should remain static, but that the STATUS of Professional or Virtuoso should remain.
There is a logic to this, since the player has been capable of that level.
However, those permanent statistics are there on the users profile, and doing this would cheapen the additional achievement of retaining the relevant status.
Edited at 22:45 Tue 21/08/07 (BST)
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
holding rank
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.