ranking changes
Viewing forum thread.
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
06:12 Tue 27 Jun 06 (BST) [Link]
could it be better to make the points change after a ranked match not only dependant on the opponents rank but also on how many balls the opponent has left?
should a 7-balling be worth the same as a foul on the black?
post your opinions here
should a 7-balling be worth the same as a foul on the black?
post your opinions here
08:03 Tue 27 Jun 06 (BST) [Link]
Excellent idea! Say 0.1 per ball?
Shouldnt be too hard to code either.. Nice one!
Shouldnt be too hard to code either.. Nice one!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:26 Tue 27 Jun 06 (BST) [Link]
I think you should still win the same amount, but add on the right amount depending how many balls are left.
e.g. i get like 2.45 rank, but i won by 4 balls so plus 0.4 as well.
I think it should be 0.2 per ball though
e.g. i get like 2.45 rank, but i won by 4 balls so plus 0.4 as well.
I think it should be 0.2 per ball though
11:39 Tue 27 Jun 06 (BST) [Link]
I like it, but do you think it will cause defensive play?
Ppl may well play more cagely, and take less risky attacking shots, if they stand to gain more points by their opponent not potting.
Ppl may well play more cagely, and take less risky attacking shots, if they stand to gain more points by their opponent not potting.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
11:45 Tue 27 Jun 06 (BST) [Link]
Yeh sounds good, and only 0.1 gain for a golden break win, and dont lose ranking if u get golden breaked. Most annoying thing is losing 6 points on a golden break
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:32 Tue 27 Jun 06 (BST) [Link]
im not so sure apart from a golden break a win is a win no matter how much you win by and therefore should be rewarded jst the same
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
15:36 Wed 28 Jun 06 (BST) [Link]
I quite like this idea aswell
It would reward those who've played well.
Edited at 20:37 Wed 28/06/06 (BST)
It would reward those who've played well.
Edited at 20:37 Wed 28/06/06 (BST)
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
18:29 Wed 28 Jun 06 (BST) [Link]
I dont think it would cause defensive play because a player losing might think that (s)he needs to go for a few pots in order not to lose by too many balls.
And yeah i think you should just keep the changes as they were but just add 0.2 ish for every colour ball the opponent has left.
to 'motivate' the opponent maybe a less grave deduction for every ball aswell?
And yeah i think you should just keep the changes as they were but just add 0.2 ish for every colour ball the opponent has left.
to 'motivate' the opponent maybe a less grave deduction for every ball aswell?
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
07:24 Thu 29 Jun 06 (BST) [Link]
I think it would make players be less defensive, i'd go for 7 ballings constantly.
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
10:52 Tue 22 Aug 06 (BST) [Link]
lol i made this thread so long ago but nothing ever changes from suggestions on forums
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:37 Tue 22 Aug 06 (BST) [Link]
And if you get defeated by a golden break you lose half the points you would lose if you lost normaly!
Deleted User
(IP Logged)
(IP Logged)
12:42 Tue 22 Aug 06 (BST) [Link]
get a +1 bonus for a run out, 0.5+ bonus for a 7 balling.
Sorted
Sorted
Unable to post | |
---|---|
Reason: | You must log in before you can post |
ranking changes
Back to Top of this Page
Back to Game Queries.
Back to Forum List.