Making both players "ready" to play is a joke. Sitting waiting for half an hour for a game to start is a joke. People take the mick, back to the old system please.

nah, the majority vote, more ppl like it.
what to do is leave after 20 seconds, cos they'll end up leaving first.

just look around 4 a game.

the new system is spot on, and had to be brought in because of a small number of ppl who used the old system to cheat.

Simply calling well thought out ideas a 'joke' is pathetic. The idea was discussed on these forums for months (without you offering any better ideas I notice).

So jackcrap, do u HAVE a better idea to stop cheating on the old rules? Or can u only slate other ppl's ideas. Love to hear your plans m8.

lmao case closed..... very well put martin

Dont get on your high horse about this, its not fund management, lol. I didnt know about the cheating and would b interesting to read about it altho cant b bothered wasting my life doing that, nevermind playing.

Edited due to pointless back-biting comments by me.

Like jackcrap, can't be bothered 2 say it

Edited at 22:29 Wed 14/06/06 (BST)

Come on, ya not got the balls to f wit me? I no folks that wud hav u for breakfast. Stop taking a diddy game serious as it makes for the joke previously mentioned.

Edited at 22:42 Wed 14/06/06 (BST)

omg i feel a forum argument coming on. maybe its for the best if this gets stopped.

''didnt know about the cheating and would b interesting to read about it ''

yeah i bet you would

"I no folks that wud hav u for breakfast."

R u threatening me? If not, do u want to explain that?

Now who's taking it serious????

I disagree with your comments. I aint withdrawing mine. You call other ppl's carefully thought out ideas a joke, but offer no alternatives. I don't think that's debating, discussing or anything like it.

Edited at 06:54 Thu 15/06/06 (BST)

Guys please try to debate the topic rather than having a go at each other.

eve, I feel I was debating the topic, whilst iamcarp wasn't at all - just slating other ppl's hard work.

And considering that he then resorted to making violent threats, shouldn't you be talking to him rather than both of us

*waves imaginary red card in eve's direction while pointing at iamcarp*

Edited at 11:29 Thu 15/06/06 (BST)

Martin just because you are articulate it doesn't make your comments any less arguementative.

I wasn't trying to be argumentative. I just think it's wrong to name call without offering solutions.

I take ur point tho, I've turned it into an unneccesary thread. Sorry eve and iamcrap.



Edit correcting my spelling errors. Now you've called me articulate, I couldn't leave them in.

Edited at 15:06 Thu 15/06/06 (BST)

i think its sad how some one can get so angry that he is willing set some lads upon another!

*shakes head in disbelief*

Er, its wrong to name call whatever dude! Offering a solution doesnt make it ok to call someone a *****!

(the above is a statement of fact, with no predjudice to any party or parties formerley taking part in the discussion)

;-)

Edited at 20:34 Thu 15/06/06 (BST)

iamcrap is his name spinner. I didn't swear at all so I don't know what all your asterix's are about. I have apologised to both eve and iamcrap for being argumentative, so no real need for you to chime in...being argumentative.

Now that you've had a chance to get used to the new features iamcrap, do you agree that the changes are good?

You no longer get ppl going for GB's then leaving. If you enter an 'over 750 only' game and find a 580 in there u can leave b4 they break. When you've finished a game of 9ball, you don't have to rush out b4 they try to sink a ball from break and beat u, and you can take your time in 8ball & Uk, cos they can't leave with 2 balls down.

I think it is much better now.

Why the need to confirm if u wanna leave a game. Some people just have too much time. Thats the way i see it when lame changes such as this are made.